Re[2]: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-30 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Peter, Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote: Peter Hello Granville Cousins, Peter on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the Peter message with reference Peter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [GC] Peter wrote (at least in part): I am using K9 Spam

Re[2]: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-30 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Peter, Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote: Peter Hello Granville Cousins, Peter on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the Peter message with reference Peter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [GC] Peter wrote (at least in part): I am using K9 Spam

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-30 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Granville, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30.09.2006, 11:41 +0200GMT here), you wrote: GC Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote: GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!? GC

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Granville, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I live), you wrote: GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam GC marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!? GC This is just to see that it is working correctly. Press

Re[2]: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-30 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Roelof, Saturday, September 30, 2006, 11:33:34 AM, you wrote: Roelof Hallo Granville, Roelof On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I Roelof live), you wrote: GC Can you tell me where I can view the X-Text-Classification: spam GC marker in emails that have been

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-28 Thread Granville Cousins
On 26 Sep 2006, at 11:09, Marten Gallagher wrote: Hello TBUDL, I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding: X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. Yes I have ticked this option in Configuration/K9

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-28 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Granville Cousins everyone else, on 28-Sep-2006 at 15:41 you (Granville Cousins) wrote: Where can I find this configuration in The Bat! filters section? I have looked in there and cannot see any place where I can request The Bat! to filter my email using the header classification. I

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Roelof Otten everyone else, on 26-Sep-2006 at 17:21 you (Roelof Otten) wrote: The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to v3, what Peter suggested can't be done with your 1.62r But only the part with the common filters. He doesn't need to upgrade to v3 to

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello TBUDL, I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding: X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked this option in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work with The Bat

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Marten Gallagher
Hello TBUDL, I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding: X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. Yes I have ticked this option in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work

Re[2]: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Peter, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote: Peter Hi Granville, Peter on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here), Peter you wrote: GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it GC possible to configure The Bat

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Granville, On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I live), you wrote: GC Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a GC littel more step by step help please? The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to v3, what

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Granville, on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here), you wrote: GC I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it GC possible to configure The Bat! to Filter my email by adding: GC X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked

Re: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Marten Gallagher
Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a littel more step by step help please? Click Account Sorting Office/Filters Account Drop Down Box: click on Common Filters Click on the funnel top left Right hand side: Name change 'new filter' to 'K9 Junk' or something

Re[2]: Configuring K9 Spam Filter

2006-09-26 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Roelof, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 4:21:33 PM, you wrote: Roelof Hallo Granville, Roelof On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I Roelof live), you wrote: GC Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a GC littel more step by step help

Re[2]: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-10 Thread vitalie vrabie
Hello Robin, Thursday, February 2, 2006, 11:54:19 PM, you wrote: I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit card) only allowed http connections. I could be wrong, I only looked at it

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JP Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can JP send mail. First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it doesn't matter to TB as it's always

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread Cricket
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:34:13 +0100 Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo John, On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JP Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can JP send mail. First thing that comes to mind is

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello John Phillips everyone else, on 02-Feb-2006 at 08:05 you (John Phillips) wrote: POP Server 127.0.0.1 By default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default). That may be the culprit. I forget it each time I install K9 for someone. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread John Phillips
Hi Alexander, On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 19:29:59 [GMT+0100] (which was Fri, 5:29:59 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: y default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default). Thanks, that is set up correctly. On ADSL in Holiday Inn right now; all working fine. Any other clues? --

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 13:34:13 [GMT+0100] (which was 23:34:13 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it doesn't matter to TB as it's always downloading from localhost. Thinking about it, it may be the wireless provider

Re: Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-02 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 at 18:05:13 +1100, John wrote: Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can send mail. I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit card) only

Wireless, Bat K9 spam filter

2006-02-01 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans, Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat K9, although I can send mail. No problems with dial up or broadband. My settings are:- POP Server 127.0.0.1 log in mail.bigpond.com/110/jp88 password x Am I missing some reason why I cannot download with wireless? I

Re[3]: K9 spam filter

2004-12-01 Thread Code 2
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* RHS They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't RHS mind. Some of them are quite funny, and once in awhile I'll bite on RHS one

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread P.Johnson
Hello Mark, On Monday, November 29, 2004, 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PJ The filter is as follows: PJ TB! Message Filter PJ beginFilter PJ UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08] PJ Name: K9\20Anti-Spam PJ Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A} PJ

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread P.Johnson
Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for the

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello P.Johnson everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 17:11 you (P.Johnson) wrote: K9 learns and works very quickly Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* so this is frustrating; don't know whether

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread P.Johnson
Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: K9 learns and works very quickly ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* I've received a couple lately and

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! My filter looks like this: TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D] Name: SPAM Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5C$JUNK$ MarkRead SetColour 226723330 IsActive Ignore IsSendQueue endFilter and it

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Code 2
K9 learns and works very quickly ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except for spam words like Nigeria, Togo and Central

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Code 2 everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:06 you (Code 2) wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except for

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:00 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote: Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} You altered the default header from spam to junk. Unless Pat did that, it won't work for her. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Gerard
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* BayesFilter catches these for me nicely. It is weak on other mails though :( -- Best regards,

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 19:24, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: You altered the default header from spam to junk. Unless Pat did that, it won't work for her. :-) Ah, yes. I thought my old PopFile-filters would work with K9 when I just changed the header-addition. And guess what, the filters

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Gerard
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* Hi Alexander, I usually alert the company which email is being abused by sending a mail to

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gerard everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:44 you (Gerard) wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* BayesFilter catches these for me nicely. It is weak on other mails though

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Gerard
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 8:35:09 PM, you wrote: ASK now it seems to me it is better to let the ASK whitelisted mails not go to the database since the english language 419 ASK mails get thru, maybe there'se too little difference... That is how I have set it up. -- Best regards, Gerard

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello P.Johnson everyone else, on 30-Nov-2004 at 18:51 you (P.Johnson) wrote: ASK Is it a common filter? Maybe you've just forgotten to share it with your ASK accounts. I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly different conditions. And, neither works

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Dick H.
Hello Gerard, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 19:44:25 GMT +0100 (which was 19:44:25 where I live), Gerard wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of K9 spam filter: G ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote: That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter. The spammers are getting very smart and know their ways to cheat these filters. I installed a challenge/response based spam filter and not a single spam mail got to my inbox since then

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Dick H.
Hello Jernej, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 22:18:06 GMT +0100 (which was 22:18:06 where I live), Jernej Simoncic wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of K9 spam filter: JS On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote: That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread P.Johnson
Hi Alexander, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly different conditions. And, neither works consistently. It seems strange that some mail classified as spam would be moved to the correct

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread P.Johnson
Hello Thorvald, On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TN My filter looks like this: TN TB! Message Filter TN beginFilter TN UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D] TN Name: SPAM TN Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A} TN MoveMessage

Re[2]: K9 spam filter

2004-11-30 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Alexander, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh* They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't mind. Some of them

K9 spam filter

2004-11-29 Thread P.Johnson
Hello, I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for the purpose of filtering it. The filter is as follows: TB! Message Filter

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-29 Thread Mark Partous
Hello P.Johnson, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote: PJ The filter is as follows: PJ TB! Message Filter PJ beginFilter PJ UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08] PJ Name: K9\20Anti-Spam PJ Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A} PJ MoveMessage

Re: K9 spam filter

2004-11-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello P.Johnson, Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote: I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for the purpose of