Dear Thomas,
On 04:39 20.12.2002, you [Thomas Fernandez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])]
wrote...
What is the UID for anyway, since the MID is already unique?
The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
that
Hello Johannes,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:19:34 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 16:19 +0700 GMT),
Johannes Posel wrote:
The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:51:57 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you such a list in
Hello Johannes,
Monday, December 16, 2002, 6:05:34 AM, you wrote:
JP Dear Peter,
JP On 11:03 16.12.2002, you [Peter Palmreuther
JP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
The trouble the OP might be run into will likely be: the POP3-server
does not generate the same UID for the same message every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, December 16, 2002, Peter Palmreuther wrote...
The trouble the OP might be run into will likely be: the
POP3-server does not generate the same UID for the same message
every time. This is a known, but not wide spread problem which can
Hello Jonathan,
Thursday, December 19, 2002, 5:42:36 PM, you wrote:
JA -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA Hash: SHA1
JA On Monday, December 16, 2002, Peter Palmreuther wrote...
The trouble the OP might be run into will likely be: the
POP3-server does not generate the same UID for the same
Dear Craftsman,
On 00:53 20.12.2002, you [Craftsman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
server, though a client should be able to handle identical copies
with the same unique-id [oxymoron there, huh?].
There's always the message ID left, which will be a same unique ID if
you're accesing the same
Hello Johannes,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:25:25 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 07:25 +0700 GMT),
Johannes Posel wrote:
server, though a client should be able to handle identical copies
with the same unique-id [oxymoron there, huh?].
There's always the message ID left, which will be a same unique ID if
Hi Allie,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:29:21 -0500
Allie C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue
to download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
doesn't take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
That's likely a server
Dear Peter,
On 11:03 16.12.2002, you [Peter Palmreuther
([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
The trouble the OP might be run into will likely be: the POP3-server
does not generate the same UID for the same message every time.
This is a known, but not wide spread problem which can only be fixed on
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:05:34 +0100
Johannes Posel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trouble the OP might be run into will likely be: the
POP3-server does not generate the same UID for the same message
every time. This is a known, but not wide spread problem which can
only be fixed on
If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It doesn't
take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
Anybody know a cure?
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Hey Craftsman,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61)' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sunday, December 15, 2002 at 2:53:04 PM.
C If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
C doesn't
Hello Craftsman,
On Sunday, December 15, 2002, 14:53:04 -0500 GMT (which was 20:53
local time), Craftsman wrote:
C If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It doesn't
C take long to end up with a gazillion
Hello Andre Wichartz,
on 2002-12-15 at 21:31 CET you wrote:
AW Hello Craftsman,
AW On Sunday, December 15, 2002, 14:53:04 -0500 GMT (which was 20:53
AW local time), Craftsman wrote:
C If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C download *all* the files left on the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Craftsman [C] wrote:'
C If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue
C to download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
C doesn't take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
That's likely a server configuration
Hello Craftsman,
C If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will
C continue to download *all* the files left on the server
C over and over. It doesn't take long to end up with a
C gazillion dupes.
I had the same problem, but only when I switched to 1.62;
I now leave all messages on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
