Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-09 Thread Allie Martin
On Mon, 8 May 2000 22:41:11 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: He he he!! Nor mine... but I must admit, I waited for a few more people to download and install 1.42c before I ventured into it. ;o) I trust Allie, so when I saw that he had the version, I figured it was safe to install it. The file

Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Curt
Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within messages results in absolutely nothing. Wonder how the associations were lost. More importantly, how to get them back. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Curt, On Mon, 8 May 2000 06:06:17 -0400GMT (08/05/2000, 18:06 +0800GMT), Curt wrote: C Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within C messages results in absolutely nothing. I cannot confirm this. Links open as usual. My browser is Netscape 4.7. -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Curt, On Monday, May 08, 2000 at 12:06:17 PM you wrote: Since the installation of 1.42c, What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) Oliver Sturm -- % If I had a ( for every $ Congress spent, what would I have? Too many ('s. -- Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 71D86996

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi Curt Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within messages results in absolutely nothing. Can't confirm this. I work with IE. The problem that I've now with 1.42c is that using Shift and a double click on a http link won't cause IE to open a new window anymore. No,

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Nick Andriash
On Monday, May 08, 2000, 10:41:42 AM, Oliver Sturm wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) That is a good question Oliver. I had asked the same question a few days ago, and was basically told that it was the 1.42 Final... with a few bug fixes. Huh? Anyway, if you go to their FTP

Re[2]: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Quin Selman
Hello Nick, Monday, May 08, 2000, 6:18:02 PM, you wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) NA NA Anyway, if you go to their FTP Server, and download/install the latest NA offering, you'll see you Help/About will then say 1.42c instead of just NA 1.42 I did that earlier but

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Quin, On Mon, 8 May 2000 19:42:44 -0600GMT (09/05/2000, 09:42 +0800GMT), Quin Selman wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) NA Anyway, if you go to their FTP Server, and download/install the latest NA offering, you'll see you Help/About will then say 1.42c instead of just NA 1.42

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Nick, On Mon, 8 May 2000 20:26:50 -0700GMT (09/05/2000, 11:26 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA This still doesn't answer the basic question... and that is, how does NA 1.42c differ from 1.42? There has been nothing from RitLabs on this issue. NA Now are you saying that there is yet another

Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c

2000-05-08 Thread Nick Andriash
On Monday, May 08, 2000, 8:43:53 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: No, there was no announcement about the difference between 1.42 and 1.42c. I was told there are "minor bug fixes", and I just love cyptic answers, so I didn't pursue it further. Didn't crash my system, though. ;-) He he he!! Nor