On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 4:35:29 AM, MFPA wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I use colour groups, so that all unread messages are listed in
M red.
Or you could set an Unread Messages display shortcut. I have this set
to Ctrl+# for Show Only Unread Messages and then I use the
Hello Anne,
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 13:54:23, Anne wrote:
Or you could set an Unread Messages display shortcut. I have this set
to Ctrl+# for Show Only Unread Messages and then I use the preset
shortcut Ctrl+= to show all messages if I want to see everything.
Again, thanks for a good
Hi
On Saturday, 16 October, 2004, at 11:34:13 PM, Roman Katzer wrote:
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 18:08:25, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
My unread messages are shown bold... :-)
I use colour groups, so that all unread messages are listed in
red.
Mine too, but if you've turned threaded views
Hello Roman Katzer everyone else
17-Okt-2004 00:34, you wrote:
My unread messages are shown bold... :-)
Mine too, but if you've turned threaded views on and one message at the
end of a thread is unread, all previous messages are bold, too.
Yes. I read my mails threaded, too - and the one
Hello list,
the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
similar and thus hard to tell apart. Bad UI, no cookie!
Is there a way of changing them?
Roman
--
The House of Representatives held a hearing on cloning; you have to
picture 400 white guys in blue suits
Hello Roman,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:54:46 -0400 GMT (17/10/2004, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
RK similar and thus hard to tell apart.
Not confirmed, using standard icons.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Travel is very
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:13:55, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
RK the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
RK similar and thus hard to tell apart.
Not confirmed, using standard icons.
Here's a screenshot of mine, I find it too similar.
Again
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:43:21, Roman Katzer wrote:
Here's a screenshot of mine, I find it too similar.
Hnng. Attachment stripped. Here:
http://kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~roman/pictures/icons.png
Again, is there any way to change this?
Roman
--
Explaining the unknown by
Hello Roman Katzer everyone else
16-Okt-2004 19:54, you wrote:
the icons for unread vs. read mail in the message flags column are very
similar and thus hard to tell apart.
My unread messages are shown bold... :-)
Bad UI, no cookie!
LOL
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http
Hello Richard,
I have to agree with you that it would be nice to have different colours
if possible so that they stand out more. At the moment you have to look
for them and they can't be distinguished with peripheral vision.
I agree with you here. I like the new icon set as a whole but, in my
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 18:08:25, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
My unread messages are shown bold... :-)
Mine too, but if you've turned threaded views on and one message at the
end of a thread is unread, all previous messages are bold, too.
Roman
--
No culture can live, if it attempts
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M You can still use your old glyph set. You will only miss 5 icons in the
M Sorting Office that were added quite recently for:
True and the hopeful customisable toolbars in the Christmas edition
should take care of that problem.
Hello Roman,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:43:21 -0400 GMT (17/10/2004, 01:43 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
Not confirmed, using standard icons.
RK Here's a screenshot of mine, I find it too similar.
They look the same over here, we just have different eyes. ;-)
RK Again, is there any way to
Hey Tim,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, December 11, 2002 at 8:06:56 AM.
Ok, that should be it.
http://www.musson.net/tim/TB-Message-Icons.png
--
Tim Musson
Flying with The Bat! eMail v1.61
Windows 2000
Hello Marck,
O PGP-signed, but do not get ticked .
MNo, Thomas was being a little misleading there. TB does not
Msupport PGP/MIME. It only supports S/MIME. These tickmark
Micons are S/MIME signed message indicators. Nothing to do with
MPGP. I, in fact, usually sign my messages with GnuPG. This
ON Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 4:08:14 PM, you wrote:
TM Ok, I have updated the image 3 times sense first posting... I keep
TM thinking of other icon variations. Can anyone think of any I missed?
Hi Tim,
Although it seems a contradiction in terms there is an icon variation
that shows on
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 9:41:44 PM, you wrote:
TM Yep, Thomas F. replied to this same subject describing it. I am
TM working on getting one with an appropriate subject line so I can
TM include it in the image.
All Simon Blake's messages have one, as did Marck's in his reply
to
Hey Gerard,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Business' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, December 11, 2002 at 5:21:54 AM.
G Although it seems a contradiction in terms there is an icon variation
G that shows on un-read msg that has been replied-to and also
Hey Simon,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Beta/17) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 4:57:03 PM.
TM A check in a yellow circle.
RP It seemed to correspond to having something like 'sig'(?) in the column
RP (window) where
Hey Roger,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 5:04:21 AM.
Latest is now posted..
http://www.musson.net/tim/TB-Message-Icons.png
Will work on adding the UnRead forward/replied
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 01:16:37[GMT +](which was 01:16 where I
live) you wrote:
MDP This one is signed with S/MIME
MDP just to ring the changes.
Now that's weird because I don't get a tick on your envelope icon :-(
--
Best regards,
Richard
Your friends will know you better
Hello Richard,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 23:09:47[GMT +](which was 23:09 where I
live) you wrote:
RW Now that's weird because I don't get a tick on your envelope icon
:-( But maybe it's because I don't have the standard Bat glyphs, I
have a downloaded set.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Life can
Hi, all Batters,
Without any success I have tried all the sources I can think of to find a list of
'Message
flags' and what they mean. I am talking about the various 'envelope' icons which
appear in the message windows.
Can anyone point me in the right direction to find this information, or give
Hey Roger,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 5:04:21 AM.
RP Without any success I have tried all the sources I can think of to
RP find a list of 'Message flags'
Without any success I have tried all the sources I can think of to
RP find a list of 'Message flags' and what they mean. I am talking
RP about the various 'envelope' icons which appear in the message
RP windows.
Musson Is this what you are looking for?
Musson http://www.musson.net/tim/TB-Message-I
Hello Subhi,
SSH what does parked mean ?
When a message is parked it cannot be deleted or moved and
the folder cannot be deleted or moved. If a parked message
subsides in a sub folder even the parent folder cannot move.
--
Best regards,
Victor B. Gonzalez
[EMAIL
Hey Tim,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 8:30:38 AM.
RP A list of 'Message flags' and what they mean.
TM Is this what you are looking for?
TM http://www.musson.net/tim/TB-Message-I
Hi Ochrid,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:22:30 +0100
Ochrid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone think of any I missed?
Perhaps the one I was asking about before?
Simone Blake's signature?
See: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hogen/
This indicates his message is S/MIME signed. It does not indicate any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Ochrid,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:22:30 +0100 your time, you said:
TM Can anyone think of any I missed?
O Perhaps the one I was asking about before? Simone Blake's signature?
O See: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hogen/
It indicates the message has an
Hello Roger,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:04:21 +0200 GMT (10/12/02, 17:04 +0700 GMT),
Roger Phillips wrote:
Without any success I have tried all the sources I can think of to find a list of
'Message
flags' and what they mean. I am talking about the various 'envelope' icons which
appear
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 5:08:14 PM, you wrote:
snip
RP A list of 'Message flags' and what they mean.
TM Is this what you are looking for?
TM http://www.musson.net/tim/TB-Message-Icons.png
TM Ok, I have updated the image 3 times sense first posting... I keep
TM thinking of other
Hey Roger,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at 1:01:32 PM.
RP Many thanks for the trouble you took to answer my query. Just what
RP I was looking for.
Welcome, kind of fun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Tim,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:41:44 -0500 your time, you said:
TM Hey Roger,
TM My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used
TM to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday,
TM December 10, 2002
Hi Ochrid,
@10-Dec-2002, 20:42 +0100 (19:42 UK time) Ochrid [O] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TF A little tickmark in a yellow circle indicates that the message
TF is signed by S/Mime or PGP/Mime.
O Is the secret in the 'mime' bit? Marck Pearlstone's messages are
O
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:16:37 + GMT (11/12/02, 08:16 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
No, Thomas was being a little misleading there. TB does not support
PGP/MIME.
What happens to the envelope icon when a PGP/MIME signed message
arrives? No tickmark, no nothing?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
No, Thomas was being a little misleading there. TB does not support
PGP/MIME.
What happens to the envelope icon when a PGP/MIME signed message
arrives? No tickmark, no nothing?
Nope,
Hello Jonathan,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:16:26 -0600 GMT (11/12/02, 11:16 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
What happens to the envelope icon when a PGP/MIME signed message
arrives? No tickmark, no nothing?
Nope, you'll probably find you'll just see a message.att file.
I see.
--
Cheers,
Fellow TB users,
Just curious to know the meaning of colour codes in the message flag.
In the 'envelope' icon some messages have a blue colour and in others a reddish
colour.
What reason behind this
I had also posted a query on the macro %Attachments. Any views ?
--
Best regards,
Hello Raj,
On Monday, August 13, 2001 at 12:10:17 PM you wrote (at least in part):
R In the 'envelope' icon some messages have a blue colour and in others a reddish
colour.
R What reason behind this
Blue = Low Priority
Red = High Priority
Nothing = Normal Priority
Green-Arrow =
This may sound lame but, here it goes:
What are message flags good for ?
I'm referring to those red dots that when clicked transform into
a tiny flag.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...Oh wait, he already does
On 05-05-2001 at 16:43, Silviu Cojocaru kindly wrote:
What are message flags good for ?
To designate the meaning *you* attach to them. Some people
use flags to mark urgent mails, others use them to yet-to-
be-replied to mails, etc.
- K -
--
Inessential insanities get one in trouble
Hello Kiyan Azarbar,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:27:29 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, November 06, 2000, 4:27:29 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Kiyan Azarbar wrote:
I just came across this problem today, and it's a rather big one for me. I
checked my mail by telnetting in and using mutt
Hello Kiyan,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 at 04:27:29 GMT -0500 (which was 1:27 AM
where I live) witnesses say Kiyan Azarbar typed:
snip Sorry, I don't have any solutions for the other question.
2) Is there some way to "remove duplicate messages in this folder" ? I think I
came across one once but
43 matches
Mail list logo