Hello Tim.
--On 07 June 2005 21:38 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: On The Fly Encryption
3.5.25:
Well that's a bit strong. I only asked. Whatever.
No I wasn't trying to be a bit strong, I was trying to save you from
another trouting. Did you read below my signature line?
--
Tony.
M
Hi
On Tuesday 7 June 2005 at 10:18:45 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Bicknelle wrote:
Roelof Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
Roelof message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
Roelof encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on
Hi
On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 8:27:25 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Boom wrote:
Did you read below my signature line?
Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative
Using The
Hi
On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 10:31:59 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too.
Or even, that _line_.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Put knot yore trust inn spel chequers
Hi MFPA,
-- 08.06.2005 10:59 +0100:
Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too.
Or even, that _line_.
I thought of _h_int. ;)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current version is
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, MFPA wrote:
On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 8:27:25 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Boom wrote:
Did you read below my signature line?
Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too.
Hey, Lint http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lint_programming_tool for
e-mail would bee
Hello Manuel,
On Wednesday, June 8, 2005 at 12:03:23 PM Manuel [MB] wrote:
Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too.
Or even, that _line_.
MB I thought of _h_int. ;)
*l*ined h*int* = *lint* ;-)
Seems to be fair for all to me ;-)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
Roelof Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
Roelof message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
Roelof encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
Roelof because
Sorry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tony,
I did answer YES.
The TBB files (unencrypted) are in
c:\documents and settings\administrator\application data\the
bat!\username\inbox\messages.tbb and various dirs below..
I read through the message.tbb with say Notepad..
I backed up my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roelof We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
Roelof which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
Roelof and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
Roelof responding to more than one
Hello Tim!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 4:25 AM, you wrote:
(Using TBB 3.5.25 in Plain Unencrypted Text mode as the OTFE doesn't work)
I am doing a copy-and-paste of something I sent earlier to this
thread. Please notice the advice about changing the value 0 to the
value 1 in the registry key.
Mary I am doing a copy-and-paste of something I sent earlier to this
Mary thread. Please notice the advice about changing the value 0 to the
Mary value 1 in the registry key. This might apply here, as it was
Thanks.
Mary I am running the Professional Edition, but I chose not to have
Mary
Hello Tim!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 8:08 AM, you wrote:
So far no luck with mine even messing with reg keys and the like.
I like the idea of having the message base encrypted especially
for Laptops and the like - suitable
also password secured..
Mary I wrote this in reply to the message
Hello Tim,
A reminder of what Tim Bicknelle on TBUDL typed on:
07 June 2005 at 10:22:20 GMT +0100
Hi Tony,
Because no body know what the hell your talking about that's why and throws
the whole thing out of context.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2.
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz
Hello Tim!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 8:08 AM, you wrote:
Mary I am running the Professional Edition, but I chose not to have
Mary On-The-Fly-Encryption ...
Ahh OK. So far no luck with mine even messing with reg keys and the like.
So, I've just downloaded the fixed version, beta 3.5.26. I
Mary So, my next suggestion: Join the TBBETA list. Just today beta version
Mary v. 3.5.26 is offered, in which offer the developers specifically say
Mary that the OTFE installation bug is fixed (therefore you would not, as
I
Mary understand it, need the work-around I sent you).
I just got an
Hello Tim!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 3:16 PM, you wrote:
I just got an email from Maxim Masiutin about that very issue.
Downloading now
No need for the Beta. 3.5.26 fixed it, got an email from Maxim Masiutin
today :)
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=1483#postform
Mary,
Mary Oh, good! So glad that Maxim wrote to you. All of us here on TBUDL
Mary were glad to try to give what help we could. :)
And what a good team you are to. I might have to give the Beta forum a go to
maybe input, as I find
things ?
Cheers
Tim
--
--On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 15:21:39 -0500 Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh, good!
Mary, not only do you hijack subjects, now you managed to hijack someone's
Trout. :)
--
Tony.
LM
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hello Tony!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 3:35 PM, you wrote:
Oh, good!
Mary, not only do you hijack subjects, now you managed to hijack someone's
Trout. :)
:rofl2:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.5.26 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Tony Because no body know what the hell your talking about that's why and
throws
Tony the whole thing out of context.
Well that's a bit strong. I only asked. Whatever.
Tim
pgp8XSSyybX22.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Tim!
On Tuesday, June 07, 2005, 3:28 PM, you wrote:
Mary Oh, good! So glad that Maxim wrote to you. All of us here on
Mary TBUDL were glad to try to give what help we could. :)
And what a good team you are to. I might have to give the Beta forum
a go to maybe input, as I find things ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
A newbie here, Hi All.
I have installed TB ver 3.5.25 and have used TB for some time
I don't seem to be able to get the OTFE to work.
I have posted on the:
http://www.donzeigler.com/tbforums
and http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum
forums.
Hi
On Monday 6 June 2005 at 6:54:54 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Bicknelle
wrote:
I don't seem to be able to get the OTFE to work.
[...]
Anyone anyone ideas ?
I seem to recall reading *somewhere* that you also need to delete
the TB! registry entries prior to the install.
I think that
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, June 06, 2005, 1:09 PM, you wrote:
Anyone anyone ideas ?
I seem to recall reading *somewhere* that you also need to delete
the TB! registry entries prior to the install.
I think that was on this list a few months ago and I do not know
if it still applies.
It's also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary/All,
Registry key ?
Doesn't the full un-install Zap that key.
Anyway if anyone knows where/what the key is I can try
Cheers,
Tim
Monday, June 6, 2005, 7:14:54 PM, you wrote:
Mary On Monday, June 06, 2005, 1:09 PM, you wrote:
I seem to
Hi
On Monday 6 June 2005 at 7:42:02 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Bicknelle
wrote:
Registry key ?
Doesn't the full un-install Zap that key.
Anyway if anyone knows where/what the key is I can try
Here it is at HKCU\Software\RIT but please note the tagline in my
signature.
--
Best
Hello Tim,
A reminder of what Tim Bicknelle on TBUDL typed on:
06 June 2005 at 18:54:54 GMT +0100
Then installed the new version thebat_pro_3-5-25.msi and then (during the
install) restored my
backup.
When you reinstalled did you answer yes to OTFE? Don't think you even had
that option
Hallo Tim,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:42:02 +0100GMT (6-6-2005, 20:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TB Registry key ?
TB Doesn't the full un-install Zap that key.
Yes.
TB Anyway if anyone knows where/what the key is I can try
Hallo Tim,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:42:02 +0100GMT (6-6-2005, 20:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TB Cheers,
TB Tim
TB Monday, June 6, 2005, 7:14:54 PM, you wrote:
Mary On Monday, June 06, 2005, 1:09 PM, you wrote:
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
Hallo Roelof,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:36:44 +0200GMT (7-6-2005, 0:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-583907252-926492609-682003330-1003\Software\RIT\The
Bat!\RegistrationBlock
Naturally that should read:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RegistrationBlock
--
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, June 06, 2005, 5:47 PM, you wrote:
Naturally that should read:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RegistrationBlock
This from a post on TBBETA is probably relevant:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
by Martin Sebald, May 19, 2005, with Subject line,
Re: No On-The-Fly Pwd
32 matches
Mail list logo
