Hello Melissa,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:30:40 -0800 GMT (27/10/2003, 00:30 +0700 GMT),
Melissa Reese wrote:
I would not recommend this product to my parents or other non-geeks,
On the other hand...I did get my mother - who is impressively
non-computer literate - to use TB!. I did this
After two days of trying it out, I decided to purchase The Bat! The Bat
will replace Outlook Express as my primary e-mail client.
The reasons why I bought it:
1. Spam relief
The ability to set filters that look at message headers has _vastly_
improved my filtering of spam. Almost all the spam
Hello, Anthony:
Thank you for this. Your message was valuable, even for somebody who
has used the Bat for several years. Your remind me that it would be a
mistake to recommend it to family members (who would rely on me for
support) and you have also reminded me of the importance of keeping
HTML
Hello Anthony,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 13:30, you wrote:
AGA After two days of trying it out, I decided to purchase The Bat! The Bat
AGA will replace Outlook Express as my primary e-mail client.
AGA The reasons why I bought it:
AGA 1. Spam relief
AGA The ability to set filters that look at
Mogens writes:
Filtering:
Have you considered another filtering method such as the
BayestIt! plugin that you can find here:
Not necessary. The multipart/alternatve filter is separating almost
100% of my spam. I think that very complex filters are overkill. After
all, I still look at the
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 1:01:14 PM, Anthony wrote:
AGA There is no excuse for _any_ bugs in a commercial product.
This statement is naive and ignores the current state of the art in
software development.
It is impossible to make a software product that meets the huge and
complex (sometimes
Frank writes:
This statement is naive and ignores the current state of the art in
software development.
No, it's a statement from someone who has decades of experience in both
writing software and supporting it.
It is impossible to make a software product that meets the huge and
complex
Melissa Reese, [MR] wrote:
MR On the other hand...I did get my mother - who is impressively
MR non-computer literate - to use TB!. ...
MR ... Now and then, she even surprises me with a new trick that she
MR has discovered on her own. Each time she learns about a new and
MR useful TB! feature,
Hi,
On Sunday at 7:34 AM you wrote:
JM Good luck! I found two new features just this morning!
lol! I think I say that about every day. I always find features that I
didnt know were there.
--
Darrin
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL
On 10/26/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony G. Atkielski said:
AGA You have to pick your priorities. Several dozen crashes in two hours
AGA would seem to indicate that the priorities need to shift a little. I
AGA don't have that problem with Outlook Express, or with Forte Agent.
For what
Hi David,
@26-Oct-2003, 07:26 -0500 (12:26 UK time) David R. Austen [DRA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Anthony:
DRA Thank you for this. Your message was valuable,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if
Hi Darrin,
on Sun, 26 Oct 2003 07:51:47 -0800GMT (26.10.03, 16:51 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JM Good luck! I found two new features just this morning!
D lol! I think I say that about every day. I always find features that I
D didnt know were there.
I have been using
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
It's remotely possible that someone I know might send me a
legitimate message with Vicodin repeated eight times in the
subject, or strings of random letters in the subject, even though
it's not at all probable.
I apologize if this has
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
It's remotely possible that someone I know might send me a
legitimate message with Vicodin repeated eight times in the
subject, or strings of random letters in the subject, even though
it's not at all probable.
I apologize if this has
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:01:14 AM, you wrote:
3. Sparse documentation
I'm not one to depend a great deal on documentation, but the online
help for The Bat is among the sparsest I've ever seen, and it's a
complex product. I can usually figure out things on my own,
That's good news,
Darrin-
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 7:51:47 AM, you wrote:
D lol! I think I say that about every day. I always find features that I
D didnt know were there.
Ditto here, although I usually find features because of discussion on
this list. I'll take tbudl over documentation any day!
--
-Mark
Hello Anthony,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote:
AGA 1. PGP support
AGA PGP support for Outlook Express with PGP 8.x works great. It hardly
AGA works at all with The Bat.
This is quite strange to hear. From my experience, it's quite contrary
:-)
AGA No sense in having twenty
Melissa Reese, [MR] wrote:
BTW, are my signatures verifying OK since getting my public key
update, i.e., the one with the newly generated encrypting subkey?
MR They're fine here. :-)
Good. I was wondering if I'd need to generate a brand new key pair.
--
-= allie_M =- | List Moderator
Hello Michael,
I apologize if this has been previously discussed (if so, please
direct me to the appropriate thread and I'll look it up), but is there
a way to filter those strings of random letters? I didn't even know
how to describe the problem before reading your description above.
I
Hello Anthony,
AGA No, it's a statement from someone who has decades of experience in both
AGA writing software and supporting it.
You can write bug-free software? For let's say a product the size of
the Bat? Do you have any examples, I would be seriously impressed.
AGA You have to pick your
20 matches
Mail list logo
