Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 you wrote:
TF Hello Jack,
TF On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:17:18 -0500 GMT (12-Apr-15, 21:17 +0700 GMT),
TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Hello Jernej,
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 you wrote:
JS On Saturday, April 11, 2015, 1:44:19, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Is
Hello Jack,
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:17:18 -0500 GMT (12-Apr-15, 21:17 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Hello Jernej,
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 you wrote:
JS On Saturday, April 11, 2015, 1:44:19, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I
Hi
On Monday 20 April 2015 at 3:04:44 PM, in
mid:1855375170.20150420210...@gmx.net, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have seen TB!
crash if there is not enough RAM when downloading many
emails with a lot of MB.
TB! also behaves strangely with large incoming emails when the email
partition is
Hello Jack,
On Saturday, April 11, 2015, you wrote:
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments. TB choked and wouldn't download any of the
emails from the server because of
Hello Jack,
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, you wrote:
ND Isn't this what the Connection Center is really useful for? Modern
ND broadband has meant that it's been unused for a long time here, but in
ND dial-up times was great for demonstrating whether something was actually
ND happening on the
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 you wrote:
ND Hello Jack,
ND On Saturday, April 11, 2015, you wrote:
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments. TB choked and
Wireshark?
https://www.wireshark.org/download.html
--
Rick
The great religions are the ships, Poets the life boats.
Every sane person I know has jumped overboard.
~ Hafiz
Version 6.8.0.3 (BETA) (32-bit) on Windows 6.2 Build 9200
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 you wrote:
ND Hello Jack,
ND On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, you wrote:
ND Isn't this what the Connection Center is really useful for? Modern
ND broadband has meant that it's been unused for a long time here, but in
ND dial-up times was great for
Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
Monday, April 13, 2015, 9:04:56 PM, you wrote:
TH Hello Jack,
TH Sunday, April 12, 2015, 3:14:35 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tony,
As a test, I ticked the box and then set my wife's Receive header
only if message is greater than: to 12000KB. I then composed an
email of
Hello Jack,
Sunday, April 12, 2015, 3:14:35 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tony,
As a test, I ticked the box and then set my wife's Receive header
only if message is greater than: to 12000KB. I then composed an
email of about 18MB in size and sent it to her. She was able to
receive all her other
Hello Jernej,
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 you wrote:
JS On Saturday, April 11, 2015, 1:44:19, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments. TB choked
Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
Sunday, April 12, 2015, 12:10:18 AM, you wrote:
JSL Hello Paul,
JSL
JSL On Saturday, April 11, 2015 you wrote:
JSL
PB Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
PB Saturday, April 11, 2015, 9:44:19 AM, you wrote:
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails
Hello Tony,
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 you wrote:
TH Hello Jack,
TH Saturday, April 11, 2015, 3:10:18 PM, you wrote:
Well, I checked and there is NO tick in that option but it's not clear
to me what that option really means. Receive header only if message
size is greater than... seems to
On Saturday, April 11, 2015, 1:44:19, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments. TB choked and wouldn't download any of the
emails from the server
Saturday, April 11, 2015, 1:44:19 AM, you wrote:
I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments.
I usually want attachments in a separate directory on my hard disk
rather than in message bodies. I don't know the exact limit yet, but
Hello Paul,
On Saturday, April 11, 2015 you wrote:
PB Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
PB Saturday, April 11, 2015, 9:44:19 AM, you wrote:
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
JSL had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained
Hello Jack,
Saturday, April 11, 2015, 3:10:18 PM, you wrote:
Well, I checked and there is NO tick in that option but it's not clear
to me what that option really means. Receive header only if message
size is greater than... seems to imply that a message header (what's
a message header?) will
Hi
On Saturday 11 April 2015 at 1:36:39 PM, in
mid:195540957.20150411143...@ags.lu, Adrian Godfrey wrote:
Amazing how many people attach, for example, twenty
different files rather than putting all 20 in ONE Zip
or RAR-
Bring back the days when a message larger than about 1.4 MB would
I believe that should be read as
Receive only header if message
size is greater than...
IOW don't pull down really big messages unless I say to. I still have this set
to 5MB from the days I was getting by on 1GB/no at one location. There's an
analogous setting in most smartphone apps so you
Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
Saturday, April 11, 2015, 9:44:19 AM, you wrote:
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
JSL had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
JSL worth of attachments. TB choked and wouldn't
Hello Jack,
Friday, April 10, 2015, 4:44:19 PM, you wrote:
Hello TBUD Listers,
Is there a limit on the size of incoming emails set by TB? I recently
had sent to me a couple of emails each of which contained about 15MB
worth of attachments. TB choked and wouldn't download any of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
