Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-12 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Deborah, On Thursday, February 12, 2004, at 4:03:36 AM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): DW> I like TB's behaviour better myself. As Allie pointed out, it's very DW> nice to be able to leave a folder & return to it & not have to find

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-12 Thread Deborah W
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 7:30:54 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> You're still not getting it. I'm looking to have my inbox (and WH> other folders) open to the new, previously unseen messages, WH> starting with the oldest of these - while keeping the remaining WH> messages in view. I'm not tryi

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Wayne, On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:30:54 -0500GMT (11-2-04, 20:30 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DW>> In OE, when you leave a folder, it doesn't remember the message you DW>> last viewed. And you can't purge/compress folders in OE, afaik. So not DW>> really comparing apples with apples iyswim.

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Wayne, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 8:04:15 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): WH> I bet that's it! I have Compress on Exit is on for my Inbox. I don't WH> recall turning that on. Is it on by default? Allie, I just knew WH> chatting

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Allie, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 7:08:09 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): AM> Turn off auto-compression of all folders and do a weekly AM> cleanup/maintenance operation. You should be fine that way in that TB! AM> should remember your last

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread ken green
Allie Martin wrote: > Of course, what tends to disrupt TB! remembering which message you were > last reading in each folder is when you do some sort of maintenance > operation on the message base. This is why I avoid doing that unless > it's really warranted. Allie, I agree with you in that (for

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Allie Martin
Wayne Howard, [WH] wrote: WH> That's what I was hoping for myself. After thinking about it some WH> more, it's mainly the Inbox which bothers me - much more than any of WH> the folders. Here, I really think that I have something set wrong (or WH> it is broken). Although I have it set to sort on R

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Allie, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 5:25:45 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): I was surprised that you hadn't chimed in on this one before now. :) You always seem to have a good perspective on things such as this. AM> Even if I wanted what yo

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Allie Martin
Wayne Howard, [WH] wrote: WH> The more I think about it, this should be a bug not a feature WH> request. This is the only mail application that I have ever seen WH> behave this way. I'm shocked that most people don't find it WH> annoying, especially those who are using TB to read mail lists. :)

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Deborah, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 1:04:51 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): DW> In OE, when you leave a folder, it doesn't remember the message you DW> last viewed. And you can't purge/compress folders in OE, afaik. So not DW> real

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello ken, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 1:01:45 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): kg> Are you sure you guys are talking about the same behavior? A lot of kg> this discussion has been about views and moving around messages, but kg> IIRC, the original

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Deborah W
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 5:52:32 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> It certainly is in OE and full Outlook 2000/2002. I just tested WH> it. In OE, when you leave a folder, it doesn't remember the message you last viewed. And you can't purge/compress folders in OE, afaik. So not really comparing

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread ken green
Deborah W wrote: WH>> Because this should be unnecessary. What I describe is normal WH>> behavior in every other mail application I have used. > It's not normal behaviour for OE, or for Eudora, or, I think, > Pegasus...of course there are other things which are normal behaviour > in those apps (su

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Deborah, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 12:15:59 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): DW> It's not normal behaviour for OE, or for Eudora, or, I think, DW> Pegasus...of course there are other things which are normal behaviour DW> in those

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Deborah W
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 1:26:42 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> Because this should be unnecessary. What I describe is normal WH> behavior in every other mail application I have used. It's not normal behaviour for OE, or for Eudora, or, I think, Pegasus...of course there are other things whi

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello ken, On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:02:26 -0600 GMT (11/02/2004, 02:02 +0700 GMT), ken green wrote: > But by your logic, it would be logical if while reading through > messages, I deleted a message, the focus jumped to the top of the list. > And that certainly doesn't make sense. You are right abo

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Chris, On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 4:24:21 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): >> If not, I will submit a feature request. C> You will probably need to submit a feature request. However, you C> should do a search first so that you don't cre

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Bobi, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 3:38:26 AM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): BJ> Hello Deborah, BJ> On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 08:19:40[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was BJ> 16:19 where I live) Deborah wrote: Deborah>> On Tuesd

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Deborah, On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 3:19:40 AM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): DW> So you want to *see* but not *open* your unread messages, right? In DW> that case, why not use the View-Display-Only Unread Messages option? Because I want to s

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Allie Martin
Bobi Jam, [BJ] wrote: BJ> Every day, we make TB! purge msgs on exit to automatically delete BJ> old read and unread msgs, this makes in the next time TB lose its BJ> msg selection, it's really inconvenient, and Ctl-Alt-Right keystroke BJ> can not solve this situation, because the keystroke only ma

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 6:44:26 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> 1) I actually do not want to go to any unread messages. What I WH> really want to do is go to the oldest new message. Sometimes I WH> skip over messages that are not important, i.e. spam. I want to be WH> able to quickly see what m

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-11 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 2:30:36 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> That would be fine, but it has been my experience that this is not WH> always the case. Sometimes it scrolls all the way to the top and WH> ignores what is the last read message - especially with the inbox. WH> Is this a bug? Does

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Chris, On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 4:24:21 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): C> You will probably need to submit a feature request. However, you C> should do a search first so that you don't create a duplicate C> feature C> request. T

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Chris
Wayne Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ 10-Feb-2004 1:44:26 PM "Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)" > If not, I will submit a feature request. You will probably need to submit a feature request. However, you should do a search first so that you don't create a duplicate

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Peter, On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 1:21:54 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): PM> No need to scroll. + takes you to the next (first) unread PM> message. Further clarification. I think I need to restate my objective: 1) I actually do not want to go

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread ken green
Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I don't think it's a bug. It happens over here when I kill dupes and > the last message I read was a dupe. It also happens when I purge & > compress; I find it logical that the focus is at the top (it must be > somewhere, right?). I don't think it's a bug, either. But I

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Wayne, on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:22:55 -0500GMT, you wrote: TF>> I don't think it's a bug. It happens over here when I kill dupes and TF>> the last message I read was a dupe. It also happens when I purge & TF>> compress; I find it logical that the focus is at the top (it must be TF>> somewhere, r

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread ken green
Deborah W wrote: > though if the last unread message was the last message you viewed in > that folder, it will be the one displayed when you open the folder > again. Not always true. It seems that any processing of the folder (ex: compressing) or invoking a filter/view causes TB to bring you bac

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 11:30:34 AM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): TF> I don't think it's a bug. It happens over here when I kill dupes and TF> the last message I read was a dupe. It also happens when I purge & TF> comp

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Wayne, On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:30:36 -0500 GMT (10/02/2004, 21:30 +0700 GMT), Wayne Howard wrote: DW>> if the last unread message was the last message you viewed in DW>> that folder, it will be the one displayed when you open the DW>> folder again. > That would be fine, but it has been my e

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Deborah, On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, at 5:25:19 AM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): DW> if the DW> last unread message was the last message you viewed in that folder, it DW> will be the one displayed when you open the folder again. That would be fin

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-10 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 2:26:41 AM, Wayne Howard wrote: WH> Chris, after reading your reply, I guess it would be more accurate WH> to say the oldest, unread message so that I read them in order. I WH> just don't want to go to the bottom or top. Ctrl-Alt-Right will take you to the next unre

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-09 Thread Chris
Wayne Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ 9-Feb-2004 9:11:22 PM "Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)" > I think I mean to scroll to the last read message (rather than last > received message). I'm not sure. The bottom line is that I want to > quickly be able to read the la

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-09 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Wayne, On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 9:11:22 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): WH> Clarification... WH> I think I mean to scroll to the last read message (rather than last WH> received message). I'm not sure. The bottom line is that I want to

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-09 Thread Wayne Howard
Hello Wayne, On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 8:49:48 PM, you wrote re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s): WH> Does anyone know if there is a way to set TB to scroll to the last WH> received message (either at the top or the bottom)? This seems to be WH> standard in

Re: Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)

2004-02-09 Thread Chris
Wayne Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ 9-Feb-2004 8:49:48 PM "Sort/Scroll to the last received message(s)" > Does anyone know if there is a way to set TB to scroll to the last > received message (either at the top or the bottom)? This seems to be > standard in most mail applica