Greg-
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 8:05:44 PM, you wrote:
GS By 'escape' do you mean match the literal character?
Yep. Thanks. I forgot about the Advanced tab. That should do the
trick.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Hello Carsten,
I agree with you... sometimes i feel i need something like the
following:
- search all mails with subject project and my email is in cc
field
or
- if my email is in the cc field, filter it to another folder
but current search/filter (i suppose their matching algorithm are
Hello Carsten!
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:55 AM, you wrote, in part:
C I tried to send this suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the server
C rejected the mail. ...
Go to this URL
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
and create an account for yourself. Then you can put your suggestion
on the wish
Hello Carsten,
I´d like to see an improved search-option for messages, above all
multiple search-fields with options like includes ..., not includes
and a linkage between the fields like and, or. The search option in
Eudora is a good example. In my opinion, if you save lots of
information in
Hello Carsten,
CT I tried to send this suggestion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the server
CT rejected the mail. So I post it here for discussion:
You should use commands from the Help|Feedback menu to write us -
this helps us to determine where the enquiry should be sent.
Suggestions should be
Hello Stefan,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:54:28 -0400 GMT (22/08/2003, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
Actually, this is planned already, for a subsequent release of 2.0.
Currently, you can use special syntax in the search text field:
+ or - for AND
| - for OR
~ - for NOT
TF ~ for NOT? Shouldn't that be !?
And in either case, is it possible to escape the literal character?
\~ or \! or something?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Current version is 1.62r |
Hello Mark,
And in either case, is it possible to escape the literal character?
\~ or \! or something?
By 'escape' do you mean match the literal character?
If yes, then the answer is yes and much more by using regular
expressions which is selected on the 'Advanced' tab. See 'Message
Finder'
Hallo brothers,
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:46:14 -0500GMT (1-2-03, 19:46 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
bcc a. Can an option be added to Sorting Office Rules - Actions-
bcc Redirect Message to Do not Save to Sent Folder. I have a filter
bcc set up to forward certain items to myself at work.
Hello brothers,
a. Can an option be added to Sorting Office Rules - Actions-
Redirect Message to Do not Save to Sent Folder. I have a filter
set up to forward certain items to myself at work. Since I already
keep the original in a separate folder, I dont need yet another copy
in the Sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Syafril!
On Friday, November 02, 2001 at 8:28:40 AM you wrote:
Suppose we already have Draft Folder, then we can set Outbox Folder to
trigger Mail Ticker. If at any reason TB! can not send mail, the
messages will stay in Outbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chema!
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 1:04:16 PM you wrote:
It would be nice to add to TB a new feature:
Ignore confirmation request/Answer confirmations automatically.
AFAIR, you have the option to get a permission request
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 at 09:14:08 GMT +0100 (01/11/2001 15:14 where you
think I live) Dierk Haasis=[DH] wrote to RITLABS :
DH There are some features I would like to see in your program:
DH For some time now I am working with a minimised TB! main window, an
DH automatically displayed/not
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 at 11:24:02 GMT +0100 (01/11/2001 17:24 where you
think I live) Dierk Haasis=[DH] wrote to Syafril Hermansyah :
and because TB! not having draft folder (yet), sometimes confuse
which one deferred message or draft messages :-)
DH What makes you think so?
Suppose we
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 at 13:04:16 GMT +0100 (31/10/2001 19:04 where you
think I live) Chema Berian=[CB] wrote to RITLABS :
CB There are some features I would like to see in your program:
CB Every day, more and more users of email clients forget to disable the reading
CB confirmation
Hello Listers,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 19:20:23 [GMT +0700] (which was 13:20 where I
live) Syafril wrote:
CBIgnore confirmation request/Answer confirmations
CBautomatically.
SH It's already there, see Account Template and Folder Template :-)
SH Perhaps you meant while
Hi Lija
L It's very simple, really... or at least I think so. :)
L Since we already have Share with other accounts option to share quick
L templates among accounts, and it works fine, it would be _very good_ to
L implement *sharing of filters* (Sorting Office) among accounts.
L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:19:32 +0200, ANT-ilic contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
...
R Another feature could be where a single 'account' can check multiple
R 'pop'. I have a few web based mail accounts which allow for pop access
R and also
Hello Lija,
L It's very simple, really... or at least I think so. :)
L Since we already have Share with other accounts option to share quick
L templates among accounts, and it works fine, it would be _very good_ to
L implement *sharing of filters* (Sorting Office) among accounts.
On Sunday June 3, 2001 at 6:58:38 AM, Lija wrote:
When you go to View | Display | Advanced filtering, you wish sometimes
(I wish always!) to save some preferences for the future use. Something
like, to display all messages from, e.g. Stefan Tanurkov and save that
setting. Next time when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On April 14, 2001, at 8:19:43 PM, Maurice Snellen wrote:
ACM Some of the editors great formatting routines such as the
ACM reformatting of quoted material will lead to this sort of
ACM limitation.
Sorry I'm coming in late on this thread, but could
Hallo Allie,
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:17:36 -0500 GMT (11/04/2001, 08:17 +0800 GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:
MS 2) Drag and Drop attachments
MS I often receive messages containing more than one attachment of which
MS I need to forward only one or several but not all to someone else. In
MS order
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:52:13 +0200, Maurice wrote these words of wisdom:
MS 1) Hard returns and soft returns
MS When 'Auto-Format' is on, it is impossible to have two consecutive
MS lines that are not filled to the maximum width allowed by the set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 24, 2001, at 7:19:53 PM, Abigail Marshall Wrote:
AM This does NOT work well because even if only the header is downloaded,
AM the body of the message is deleted by TB from the server, so it can't
AM be retrieved later.
Yes, this has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:00:44 -0800, Nick graced us with these
comments:
AM This does NOT work well because even if only the header is
AM downloaded, the body of the message is deleted by TB from the
AM server, so it can't be retrieved later.
NA
Hallo Abigail,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:06:42 -0800 GMT (22/01/2001, 09:06 +0800 GMT),
Abigail Marshall wrote:
In a very OLD version of Netscape mail - probably Netscape 3, - it was
possible to configure the mail program to not download messages over a
certain user-specified size. For example,
Hallo Krzysztof,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:16:09 +0100 GMT (21/01/2001, 00:16 +0800 GMT),
Krzysztof J. Trybowski wrote:
KJT Alternatively, I'd like dispatcher to work in an interactive mode
KJT -- just after the request to download headers, the dispatcher
KJT window would appear,
Hello A,
On Saturday, January 20, 2001 you wrote:
Why not prevent downloading of these large messages and then download
them later at your leisure with the dispatcher. In fact you can even
ignore some after examining the headers.
Because configuring TB in the way you said means that this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, at 17:06:42 [GMT -0800], Abigail Marshall wrote:
AM In a very OLD version of Netscape mail - probably Netscape 3, - it was
AM possible to configure the mail program to not download messages over a
AM certain user-specified size.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:09:38 +0100, Krzysztof graced us with these
comments:
KJT I'd greatly appreciate a very simple thing like a "skip"
KJT button on "Receiving mail" window. This would skip current
KJT message and start
On 08-01-2001 at 01:23:12GMT +0800 (which was 17:23 where I live)
Thomas Fernandez wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - suggestions: Undelete"
Hello Thomas,
Thomas When I browse deleted messages using the folder menu, I would like
Thomas to have an option to undelete a message.
Hello Listmembers,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 at 01:23:12 [GMT +0800] Thomas Fernandez wrote:
When I browse deleted messages using the folder menu, I would like
to have an option to undelete a message.
Simply drag and drop the message wherever you want to have it
'undeleted' to.
Regards
Hello Andrej,
In a post time stamped re: "The Bat! - suggestions, Password
field in address book and edit before printing" you wrote:
Andrej In the 1.48 version you have added most of my wishs, I speak about
Andrej macros in all fields of address book,
What do you mean -- &quo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 19 December 2000 at 09:24:19 -0500 (which was 14:24 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points:
Andrej In the 1.48 version you have added most of my wishs, I speak about
Andrej macros in all fields of address book,
JR
Tuesday, November 21, 2000, 9:35:40 AM, you wrote:
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.48 Beta/8
Serial Number FE1905D5
under Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1
There are some features I would like to see in your program:
If I want to "save a
Hello Martyn,
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 10:38:19 am, you wrote:
MD Is it currently possible to define a "system-wide" set of message
MD templates that can be applied to newly created accounts within The
MD Bat! rather than having to define the templates for each new account
MD by hand every
Ok this is old, but I've been on the road and have something to point
out.
- Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message
I knew Steve would jump on this one. However, at the same time, I
*personally*
Monday, August 07, 2000, 10:09:26 AM, you wrote:
- Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message
Agreed strongly, but as an option. IE, a wrap all text to window width
option, both in preview and full
Monday, August 07, 2000, 10:09:26 AM, you wrote:
- The ability to hide ANY attachment
D'oh - didn't finish that sentance off properly. I was suggesting
that perhaps it might be a better idea to put that option somewhere
like the Options menu or perhaps have an Message Preferences menu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 2:09:26 AM, Martyn wrote:
- Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message
sub make_date {
@time = gmtime(time);
my(@month) =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 8:30:27 AM, Jamie wrote:
Perl or Python? Definitely showing off.
Perl, and not showing off, just happens to be the first snippet of code I
could find over 80 characters wide to illustrate a point more effectively than
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:16:52 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
SL Monday, August 07, 2000, 8:30:27 AM, Jamie wrote:
Perl or Python? Definitely showing off.
SL Perl, and not showing off, just happens to be the first snippet of
SL code I could find over 80 characters wide to illustrate a point more
SL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 9:34:20 AM, Curtis wrote:
I personally understand your sentence above rather than the cryptic
snippet of code you posted. If it had been wrapped inappropriately, I
wouldn't have even realised.
Point was that it would
Hi Syafril,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:25:55 +0700GMT (13/04/2000, 13:25 +0800GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt
"Unable to locate server."
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.41
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
Responding to your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 14:04:15 GMT
+0800 (which was 13/04/2000 13:04 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt
TF "Unable to locate server."
Uh strange.
I just check by query to your NAme Server,
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
Responding to your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 16:05:18 GMT
+0800 (which was 13/04/2000 15:05 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
SH ftp://ftp.dutaint.com/the_bat/rfc/rfc2369.txt
TF "Unable to locate server."
TF This error message I still get when I connect by
Hi Syafril Hermansyah,
On Wednesday, April 12, 2000 at 5:32:14 PM you wrote:
Nowadays, most of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.
I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?
Oliver Sturm
--
% If I had a ( for every $ Congress spent,
Wednesday, April 12, 2000, 12:16:21 PM, Oliver wrote:
I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?
Do a yahoo search on RFC and find out. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of
Hi there!
On 12 Apr 00, at 21:16, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re: The Bat! - suggestions":
Nowadays, most of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.
I like the idea ;), but what is RFC-2369?
It's the RFC that describes
Hello Oliver Sturm,
Responding to your article on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 21:16:21 GMT
+0200 (which was 13/04/2000 2:16 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
Nowadays, most of list already support RFC-2369 (including this list),
so supporting RFC-2369 very useful.
OS I like the idea ;), but
Tuesday, February 08, 2000, 5:54:39 PM, Syafril wrote:
Because The Bat! already have Mail Ticker to priorities message from
whom will "more priority" than others, this "priority tag" tend to
useless.
No, they tend to tell you how important the sender thought the message
was.
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thursday, February 10, 2000 at 02:34:57 GMT -0800 (which was
10/02/2000 17:34 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
Because The Bat! already have Mail Ticker to priorities message from
whom will "more priority" than others, this "priority tag"
Thursday, February 10, 2000, 3:17:02 AM, Syafril wrote:
Why we can't set priority of my own message ?
You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that the
original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than what they
actually did.
It's break the RFC rule ?
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thursday, February 10, 2000 at 08:28:19 GMT -0800 (which was
10/02/2000 23:28 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
Why we can't set priority of my own message ?
SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the original
Thursday, February 10, 2000, 9:34:24 AM, Syafril wrote:
SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what they actually did.
At the time the "high priority" arrive, we know the author
Thursday, February 10, 2000, 11:59:42 AM, Alexander wrote:
Anyway, I do support Steve's arguments here: you should NOT change the
priority of the messages that are sent to you. OTOH, colour highlighting
etc. proves to be really useful.
Which, I might add, I did support when it was spoken
Hi there!
On 11 Feb 00, at 0:34, Syafril Hermansyah wrote
about "Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority level":
Ijust check Eudora Light 3.05, you right it has 5 level
and can change the tag; Netscape 4.71 5-level (can change the tag), and
Pegasus 3.12b on
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 22:59:42 GMT +0300 (which was 11/02/2000
2:59 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
Ijust check Eudora Light 3.05, you right it has 5 level
and can change the tag; Netscape 4.71 5-level (can change the
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 09:48:16 GMT -0800 (which was 11/02/2000
0:48 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
SL You later bounce it to someone else and they get the impression that
SL the original author placed an importance greater, or lesser, than
SL what
Thursday, February 10, 2000, 7:07:56 PM, Syafril wrote:
Seems I don't really understand what's the meaning of your words, can you
explain more bit details, an example will appreciate to give me better
understanding you.
The president of the company emails you about a random musing. He
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 19:37:29 GMT -0800 (which was 11/02/2000
10:37 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
Seems I don't really understand what's the meaning of your words, can you
explain more bit details, an example will appreciate to give me better
Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 13:01:03 +0700 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 1:01:03 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
Hello tracer,
ok, understood, I did the same after he mailed me telling him that the
easy way was probably to
Hello tracer,
On Wednesday, February 09, 2000 at 17:39:36 GMT +0700 (which was
09/02/2000 17:39 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
[ ... ]
t On the other hand I found it funny as they make motherboards and
t other stuff and I donot mind having a look at it!!
LOL...
I
Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
I received this letter.
It seems some things goto the wrong place so can you please check how
this company goto onto the mailing list
quote:
-- [ From: TOTEM TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. * EMC.Ver #3.1a INTERNATIONAL ] --
Dear Sirs:
seems that your messages sent to
Hello tracer,
On Wednesday, February 09, 2000 at 12:30:32 GMT +0700 (which was
09/02/2000 12:30 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
t Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
t I received this letter.
t It seems some things goto the wrong place so can you please check how
t this company
Hello Thomas and Bat Buddies,
Instead of Purging Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I would
like to have an option to Purge Compress manually.
Hmmm. It is my understanding that only folders set to purge and compress
on exit will have this behavior, as set up in each folder's
Hi Jason,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 01:23:32 -0800GMT (06/01/2000, 17:23 +0800GMT),
Jason Thompson wrote:
Instead of Purging Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I would
like to have an option to Purge Compress manually.
JT Hmmm. It is my understanding that only folders set to purge and
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, January 06, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Jason Thompson about
PurgeCompress (was: Re: The Bat! - suggestions):
TF I want one mouse-click for "purgecompress all folder that are set
TF up for this".
Folders/Purge All Folders
--
Best reg
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 09:29, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Instead of Purging Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I
would like to have an option to Purge Compress manually.
Hello Thomas,
you can do so.
Disable "Remove old messages" an "Compress the folder" on "general"
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 at 17:37:39 GMT +0800 [Thursday, January 06, 2000
16:37 GMT +0700], you told to the list:
[ ...]
TF I now purge compress "on exit" - on *every* exit, that is. Maybe
TF the opposite of my initial suggestion should be easier to
TF implement:
Hallo Oleg, Juergen and Stefan:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:40:26 +0400 GMT (06.01.2000, 18:40 +0800 GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
TF I want one mouse-click for "purgecompress all folder that are set
TF up for this".
OZ Folders/Purge All Folders
Thanks to all of you. The Bat! has no many features that
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:29:54 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 06, 2000, 3:29:54 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hello The Bat! developers,
Thomas There are some features I would like to see in your program:
Thomas
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 12:29:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
Instead of Purging Compressing every time I close The Bat!, I
would like to have an option to Purge Compress manually.
You can do that now.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 1:37:39 AM, Thomas wrote:
the command in the folder menu. I want one mouse-click for
"purgecompress all folder that are set up for this". Incidentally,
all my folders have an old-message date, after which I want to keep
only parked messages.
You have that.
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 5:30:31 PM, you wrote:
the command in the folder menu. I want one mouse-click for
"purgecompress all folder that are set up for this". Incidentally,
all my folders have an old-message date, after which I want to keep
only parked messages.
SL You
Thursday, January 06, 2000, 8:57:37 AM, Carsten wrote:
Shouldn't that be a purge before a compress? Otherwise, you compress,
purge, then have empty space left over from the purge, right? Or am I
just confused again? ;]
Hey, I just got to work and hadn't had my morning cup of Dew. My
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:34:37 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, December 25, 1999, 4:34:37 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Hello The Bat! developers,
Steve There are some features I would like to see in your program:
Steve There is a
Hi all,
On Sunday, October 17, 1999, 12:56:28 AM (-5 GMT), Keith scribbled:
May be a new button or a pull-down menu (as one under the Get mail
button) item would be a better way then a pop-up dialog every time the
user hits Reply?
I hate to keep referring to other programs, but Agent and
Hello, The Bat Users!
SL When the reply-to and from fields differ, offer the user the choice of
SL which to use. While RFC822 states that reply-to should be used it does not
SL state that it must be used to the exclusion of from. Furthermore, since 822
SL does allow for mailing lists to
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Saturday, October 16, 1999, 11:06:13 AM, Andrew wrote:
Hello, The Bat Users!
SL When the reply-to and from fields differ, offer the user the choice of
SL which to use. While RFC822 states that reply-to should be used it does not
SL state that it must be used
Hi!
Kevin Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] about "The Bat! - suggestions":
PLEASE, PLEASE, make it an option as to whether the Message Management
option to "Download header only if message size is greater than" deletes
the message on the server or not. I would like to be notified that there
is a
Friday, October 15, 1999, 6:11:25 AM, Anne wrote:
A function to browse through the messages on the server while
online; useful for reading mail while accessing an account
remotely and want to leave the messages on the server to get the
mail from another computer and being able
Hello Anne Kaeser,
On Monday, October 11, 1999, 9:42:42 AM you told us:
AFAIK it's there (although I have never used it). Account
properties/transport/more (button next to STMP server).
AK Nope, that's only special options for SMTP authentification...
It's there.
My Mail Server (I have
83 matches
Mail list logo
