On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 8:54 PM, you wrote:
LG Right now the moderators are bidding, arguing, punching and slapping
LG to see who will get to delete that subscriber with extreme prejudice.
hey, wait, don't we get a vote???BG just walk softly and carry a big
trout!
LG I only had one
On 5/19/04, at 8:38 AM, Leif Gregory sent the following:
LG I only had one dissenting voice among you all who seemed to think our
LG attempts at making this list better was an inconvenience.
LG Thanks to all the rest of you who put up with the probes.
I think it is great to be on a list where
Hello Jimmie,
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 7:40:49 AM, you wrote:
Jimmie I think it is great to be on a list where the moderator cares
Jimmie enough to take the steps to remove something like this. Thanks
Jimmie again and no problem from here with the probes.
As Bartles and James would say, Thanks
Hello Leif,
I liken it to people who post to lists with the Reading Confirmation
Flag set.
Nope. I never ask for Reading Confirmation anywhere and I got quite a
few mails from RiskFreeMail.com, I am not sure if it was every time I
posted to the list though.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 8:27:01 AM, you wrote:
MAU Nope. I never ask for Reading Confirmation anywhere and I got
MAU quite a few mails from RiskFreeMail.com, I am not sure if it was
MAU every time I posted to the list though.
Errr. No, I meant I was making an analogy in terms of
Hallo Leif,
-- Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2004, 02:54:49:
We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
an improperly configured C/R system.
Right now the moderators are bidding, arguing, punching and slapping
to see who will get to delete that subscriber with extreme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 22:49:11 -0500 (11:49 PM here), Mary Bull [MB]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MB It would have been more than annoyance for me, if the mail from
MB RiskFreeMail had arrived in my Inbox before I read about the
MB problem
Hello Kevin!
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 10:33 AM, you wrote, in part:
KC After reading this thread I can begin to appreciate how undesirable
KC these C/R systems can be. While spam is definitely annoying, with
KC BayesIT or the many other solutions that work with The Bat!, C/R
KC simply isn't
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 7:18:48 PM, you wrote:
Mary I was 100 per cent *for* what you were doing. I hope my small
Mary joke about finding my first two probes inedible and putting them
Mary in the trash wasn't taken the wrong way!!
grin Thanks Tril... If we're not careful, people will
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 7:50:07 AM, you wrote:
Eddie It was an inconvenience also for me as I got around 6-8 such
Eddie messages. At the End I really thought it was Spam so have to
Eddie move it back to 'normal'. Leif, but this inconvenience was for
Eddie a good cause to keep this
Hello Leif!
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 12:15 PM, you wrote:
Mary I was 100 per cent *for* what you were doing.
LG grin Thanks Tril... If we're not careful, people will begin to think
LG we pay you to say nice things about us! grin
If we were on tbot, I would promise, at this point, not to
Hello Jimmie,
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 8:40:49 AM, Jimmie Toney wrote:
JT I think it is great to be on a list where the moderator cares enough
JT to take the steps to remove something like this. Thanks again and no
JT problem from here with the probes.
Agreed. BTW I like that tagline. :-)
--
Hello Leif!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 7:54 PM, you wrote:
LG We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
LG an improperly configured C/R system.
Hooray for our persistent, smart moderators!
LG Right now the moderators are bidding, arguing, punching and slapping
LG to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 18:54:49 -0600 (8:54 PM here), Leif Gregory [LG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
LG an improperly configured C/R system.
I have to ask can you
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, 18 May 2004, at 21:42:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:42 PM where
I live) you wrote:
KC I have to ask can you now disclose the purpose of the probes
KC and what the initial problem was? If I missed the original thread
KC can you point me in the right direction?
A user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 20:02:14 -0600 (10:02 PM here), Leif Gregory [LG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC I have to ask can you now disclose the purpose of the probes
KC and what the initial problem was? If I missed the original thread
Hello Kevin!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 9:44 PM, you wrote, in part:
KC Thanks for the background information. I'm not a fan of the C/R
KC philosophy. It seems much too annoying when controlling spam can
KC simply be resolved by having an efficient spam filtering system.
It would have been more
17 matches
Mail list logo
