Hello andrew,
Historians believe that Thu, 7 Jun 2001 at 10:09 GMT +0100 was when,
andrew [A] typed the following:
A Hi all,
A I've basically done what was outlined below but i found that if I'm
A BCC'd the 'personal' filter doesn't pick it up. Is there a way round
A this?
A I created a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi andrew,
On 07 June 2001 at 12:10:34 +0100 (which was 12:10 where I live)
andrew wrote to Januk Aggarwal and made these points:
JA Try making a filter for anyone in your address books. To do this,
JA put the string as 'e' or something, then
Hello Lars,
On Friday, June 01, 2001 at 10:26:26 PM you wrote:
LG You could also filter on '@' in the headers (kludges), that will
LG also catch all messages.
NOPE :-( ... sometimes I get message neither with any '@' in To, CC, nor in
From ... If you wish, I could send a message to you not
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:56:36 +0200 GMT (04/06/2001, 00:56 +0800 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
LG You could also filter on '@' in the headers (kludges), that will
LG also catch all messages.
PP NOPE :-( ... sometimes I get message neither with any '@' in To, CC, nor in
PP From ...
Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, June 03, 2001 at 7:08:20 PM you wrote:
T Hello Peter,
T On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:56:36 +0200 GMT (04/06/2001, 00:56 +0800 GMT),
T Peter Palmreuther wrote:
LG You could also filter on '@' in the headers (kludges), that will
LG also catch all messages.
PP NOPE :-( ...
Hello Peter,
Anyway, to be constructive here an idea how I'd filter:
[String].[Location]Anywhere[Presence]yes
should catch all mails either in it's regexp-meaning or in it's physical
meaning, because a '.' must be present in EVERY message because a hostname or
IP IS in every message present
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 19:28:18 +0200 GMT (04/06/2001, 01:28 +0800 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
T Do you receive legitimate email without any of those headers?
PP Of course not!!!
PP I was just replying to Lars's comment to filter on '@' to catch
PP ALL messages]
@ was a suggestion
Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, June 03, 2001 at 7:44:27 PM you wrote:
T please send me that message you offered to send to Lars.
Let me think about the Received header before ... THAT one I forgot to think
about when searching in Kludges :-)
T I still have to see an email without a rEcEivEd or datE
I am also experiencing this problem. I don't have anything special for my
filters, just, if the To: box is [EMAIL PROTECTED] then send the message
to Mailing List folder. I have others, but have never been able to get them to
work right.
--
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, June 01, 2001,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday June 1, 2001 at 9:45:12 AM, Kelly Martin wrote:
If these (or other alternatives) are met then the message is moved to
Trash. But it ain't workin'.
You can also try a different approach to spam messages. Instead of
concentrating on spam,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 01, 2001, at 10:26:25 AM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
Re: Spam filtering:
NA The easiest way to set that up is to create a Personal Filter that
NA has your address(s) as the Recipient, and this filter will be *second*
NA to last in
The very *last* filter will search
for e anywhere, and will filter straight into the trash. Actually works
quite well.
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but why the e?
Thanks.
--
I guess of all my uncles, I liked Uncle Cave Man the best. We called him
Uncle Cave Man because he lived in
Hi Matze,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, at 20:04:46 +0200 you wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but why the e? Thanks.
M Because e is in nearly every message. Therefor the filter
M fits to nearly all messages.
You could also filter on '@' in the headers (kludges), that will
also catch all
13 matches
Mail list logo
