Re[2]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

2003-09-04 Thread Vishal
Hi Krister Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:43:57 AM, you wrote: KE I can see where you're coming from and your wish is ok, imho, as long KE as functionality is the same. I don't want to miss functionality just KE because i can't see to use it, so if we have the same functionality KE but

Re[2]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

2003-09-02 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Krister Ekstrom wrote: MM (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many What do you mean by customizable interface. Please, oh please don't say you mean skins, cause if you do, i would like to be informed of another MUA, cause

Re[2]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

2003-09-02 Thread Stan Robins
Has V2 replaced the cockamamie free caret text editor with a competent auto-wrapping text editor? That would be worth upgrading for. HTML support? The hyper-techies used to consider this a bad thing, worthy only of the admiration of someone who considers Outlook Express to be a sophisticated

Re[2]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

2003-09-02 Thread Jack Morrison
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:27:26 PM, you wrote: It has added a hamstrung windows editor Say what? to cater for the wishes of those who get the hang of a sensible free caret editor ;-). Sonofagun, Marck, I've been trying, I really have, but it just ain't gonna happen. Ever. The caret