Hi Marck,
On Thursday at 5:28 PM you wrote (or at least in part):
MDP Change it in Account properties | Options.
Perfect! I I knew it had to be simple. Thanks
--
Darrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat 2.01.3
E=Mc^5...nahhh...E=Mc^4...nahh...E=Mc^3...ah, forget it!
Hello Nick,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:49:15 AM, you wrote:
NA Yes, you are right... you can have seamless on the fly signing
NA with PGP because there are specific PGP DLL's that TB uses for
NA that... RITLabs have developed a Plugin specifically for that
NA purpose. Hopefully, the upcoming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:12:18 AM, you wrote:
ACM Indeed the signing and signature verification aspects work nicely. I
ACM don't use GPG Shell for signing messages *at all*. However, for
ACM decryption and encryption I use GPG Shell.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 4:49:05 AM, you wrote:
MDP Not true, actually Nick. I use GPG without any tray application. I
MDP only use the try tools to access the key manager and lookup keys I
MDP don't have on my keyring. All
Hello Allie,
Saturday, April 27, 2002, 2:11:35 PM, you wrote:
ACM It's not a question of the need being there since he has decided
ACM to use one solution. It's a matter of which is the more
ACM appropriate under the circumstances.
Can you use either method depending upon the individual
Hello Allie,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 1:58:08 PM, you wrote:
ACM You can use S/MIME and PGP interchangeably but where ever the
ACM opportunity presents itself, I think you should go for PGP.
I would agree. You have to be able to communicate with whomever under
whatever is agreed upon between
Hello Allie,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 1:58:08 PM, you wrote:
ACM I'd always use PGP/GnuPG if I could help it.
I was installing WinPT. In the PDF file for the install it refers to
OpenPGP that I believe is GPG (i.e. same as GnuPG at
http://www.gnupg.org/).
What functionality specifically does
7 matches
Mail list logo
