Re[2]: Purging

2006-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Peter, Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 9:24:47 PM, you wrote: PM They will only be purged when you run Folder maintenance or check PM to Remove old messages in Folder -- Properties -- Additional. I have run folder maintenance, checked remove old messages when exiting, exited and restarted, and there

Re[2]: Purging

2006-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Roelof, Thursday, May 4, 2006, 1:36:59 AM, you wrote: RO Are they unread? RO What's your setting at: RO Account - Properties - Mail management - Deletion - Purge unread messages Some of the messages are unread, some read. I set the properties to purge unread messages as you suggested, but it

Re[2]: Purging

2006-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Peter, Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 9:24:47 PM, you wrote: PM Hi Richard, PM They will only be purged when you run Folder maintenance or check to PM Remove old messages in Folder -- Properties -- Additional. Something strange seems to be happening. I've set account and folder properties as

Re[2]: Purging with IMAP

2004-09-27 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Joe, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:38:15 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, Monday, September 27, 2004, 4:57:29 PM, you wrote: Hello, Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB 3.0. What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to trash but even

Re[2]: Purging with IMAP

2004-09-27 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Tim, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:01:20 AM, you wrote: On Tuesday, 28 September 2004, Mean Drake wrote: MD What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to MD trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do MD not get purged. How do I purge all messages on

Re: Re[2]: Purging with IMAP

2004-09-27 Thread Tim
Quoting Mean Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Account Properties Mail Management IMAP Fine-Tune -- Compress folders when switching to another folder. This doesn't Purge. As I mentioned, only FolderCompress+Purge as suggested by Kevin seems to work. Can someone give me a reminder on

Re[2]: Purging with IMAP

2004-09-27 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Kevin, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:08:56 AM, you wrote: Hi Mean Drake - On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 04:25:12 [GMT +0530] (which was 3:55 PM where I live) you wrote: Compressing reclaims space space locally and makes folder easier to read

Re[2]: Purging, browsing, and other practical matters

2002-02-22 Thread Yuki Taga
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 9:20:07 AM, Maurice wrote: MS Just press Ctrl-] and you'll be at the first unread message in MS the folder. Not for me, it doesn't. Wonder why. I just did a purge and compress, leaving two unread messages in the folder. Focus was lost, of course, after that,

Re[2]: Purging, was:: TB temp files mystery -- an experiment

2001-04-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
Friday, April 13, 2001, 12:10:40 PM, you wrote: I have been compressing, which seems to purge. Today I tried purging, which seems to compress. They appear to be redundant processes. No, as Karin put it, purge and compress are two different things. It's just in TB you can't do Purging

Re[2]: Purging

2000-01-06 Thread dMb
tracer wrote: dMb Is there anyway to prevent purging of unread messages? I looked dMb around but couldn't find the setting. The way I handle my incoming mail and I am sure it can be improved, is to make all or most regular incomings a filter so they go to their boxes and my INBOX is slipped

Re[2]: Purging folders for old messages problem

2000-01-03 Thread Carsten Dreesbach
Hello Alexander, Monday, January 03, 2000, 5:46:48 PM, you wrote: AVK Hi there! AVK On 3 Jan 00, at 15:56, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote AVK about "Re: Purging folders for old message": CD I'm looking for a way to set the received date to the creation CD date... ;] Okay "Brace

Re[2]: Purging folders for old messages problem

2000-01-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Peter, On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:42:58 +0100GMT (01/04/2000, 05:42 +0800GMT), Peter Steiner wrote: The "received" time should apparently be equal to the *latest* time stamp found in the Received: headers, IMO. If implemented this way, many problems would have gone forever... PS Are we