Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-23 Thread Deborah W
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 6:00:50 PM, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: DK>> Like when I accidentaly hit delete button and move message to Trash DK>> - digging it back from the Trash is frustrating experience. RMR> Well, at last I understand what you want! RMR> You want a "Time of entry to this folder"

Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-23 Thread Ricardo Marte
Hi Bill: BM> On Wed 23-Jul-03 5:00pm -0400, Ricardo Marte wrote: >> Yes! A "Received in Server Time" would be perfect as an added >> feature! Where is the wishlist located? BM> Start here: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt and, after you've logged in, BM> "Switch" to "The Bat! Wishes" to add your featur

Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-23 Thread Ricardo Marte
Hi Ricardo: RMR> I would suggest that you add this request to the Bugtrack database (in RMR> the wishlist) but not as a "rectification" of the received time, RMR> because I think that it's ok as it is now. I would ask for a third RMR> Timestamp column in the list: "Created time", "Received Time",

Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-23 Thread Steve M. Sawczyn
Hello Allie, Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 6:42:58 AM, you wrote: AM> When downloading mail from the server, TB! will always download the AM> mail the server received first, followed by the mail it received last. What happens if the server goes offline for whatever reason and then receives mail from

Re: Appology was Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-21 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve M. Sawczyn, [SMS] wrote: SMS> I sincerely appologize, I definitely didn't intend to violate the list SMS> rules. I didn't think so either. It's OK. Apology more than accepted. :) SMS> Should responses be indented? That's purely up to you. Our

Appology was Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-21 Thread Steve M. Sawczyn
AM> This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. I sincerely appologize, I definitely didn't intend to violate the list rules. AM> We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to which AM> you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to, and then AM>

Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-21 Thread Steve M. Sawczyn
Hello Domagoj, DK> This pisses me off with TB too. In all mail clients before TB, I DK> sorted my mail by time of arrival - time of arrival on server. If I DK> sort in any other way, by time created or by time received, I always DK> seem to read replies to messages before messages themselves. Tha

Re[2]: "Received" time should be rectified

2003-07-21 Thread Steve M. Sawczyn
Hello Perhaps you could configure your mail server to allow Imap access? In this way, messages aren't actually downloaded, so your coligue could have access. Steve Monday, July 21, 2003, 3:45:47 AM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Joe, RO> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:16:40 +0800GMT (21-7-03, 9:16 +0200, wher