Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on:
Sunday, September 24, 2006 at 21:20:10 GMT +0100
MDP> It's okay - just refresh the page. It must have been a bit
MDP> constipated, but it's certainly working fine.
It must be really stubborn because it is still not working for me. :
>> Sure, "we" worked on that! Don't you remember? ;)
MM> Could I forget it? You were silent for a while and I already wanted to
MM> ask you how it goes with the last killer-filter. I wondered if you had
MM> wrecked more mails due to some typo/bad retyping then you wished to...
No, a family em
>> The RegEx we worked on seems to work but only sometimes as today this
>> email (header excerpt) got thru:
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MM> "We" worked on "Name ", at your own request, not on "address".
MM> That's the reason why Linda Wily Liar got through this what we didn't
MM> work on.
Sure
Sunday, February 5, 2006, 10:00:16 AM, Stuart wrote:
> Hello Allen,
> A reminder of what Allen Day typed on:
> Sunday, February 05, 2006 at 09:10:27 GMT -0500
AD>> message finder--it used to support regex, but now it doesn't seem to.
AD>> Am I overlooking something or has the power of reg
JA> You might want a quick change... you have multiple "" in there, that
JA> might cause an issue. Try it like this:
JA> %REGEXPTEXT='^\".{2,}\"\s\-{2}.{20}'
Thanks Jonathan, that solved the problem.
Patrick G.
--
The Bat! Version 2.03 Beta/33
assisted by BayesIt! 0.4gm
hindered by W
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, May 31, 2001, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Thomas about
regex:
JA> %ABtoMEMO %ABtoFIRSTNAME ^^ ^^
Why not use %ABtoNamePrefix %ABtoFIRSTNAME?
--
Best regards,
Oleg Zalyalov. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! version 1.52f
Hello Peter
On 28 September 2000, at 23:08, you wrote
CTc>> My use of regexp has thus far been limited to that used in Gravity. I
CTc>> believe format does vary depending on the platform being used. Are the
CTc>> contents of the book relevant to TB's form of regexp, or is it more of
CTc>> a Perl
Hello A
On 28 September 2000, at 23:54, you wrote
CTc>> My use of regexp has thus far been limited to that used in Gravity.
CTc>> I believe format does vary depending on the platform being used.
CTc>> Are the contents of the book relevant to TB's form of regexp, or is
CTc>> it more of a Perl pro
Hello Marcel
On 28 September 2000, at 18:29, you wrote
M> I copied the url from one of the pages, and the bottom half is missing
M> :( (You've gotta love IE) therefore I thought there where v's in
M> the url.
M> The one must work:
M> http://physlab.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/%7Eorycc/vim-regex.html
On Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 9:55:17 PM, you wrote:
M> I made a 'little' typo. The URL should be:
M> http://physlab.sci.ccnv.cunv.edu/%7Eorvcc/vim-regex.html
I can't get that to work either. Even the
http://physlab.sci.ccnv.cunv.edu part does not work.
ztrader
--
Hello Marcel
On 27 September 2000, at 22:22, you wrote
M> One of the support sites also had a small tutorial about the regexps.
M> After reading that, it was very easy to apply Regexps in TB!.
M> The url for the tutorial is:
M> http://phylabs.sci.ccnv.cunv.edu/%7Eorvcc/vim-regex.html
Is that a
Hello Peter
On 27 September 2000, at 21:07, you wrote
CT>>I haven't been able to find any information in the help files
CT>>regarding how I position the cursor (in a reply) *within* the
CT>>quoted text. As an example, the message I want to reply to contains
CT>>4 par
Hi Peter,
A>> I need to be able to extract text that spans multiple lines.
A>> i.e.
A>>#This is line 1
A>> This is line 2
A>> This is line 3~
PS> There are 'internal options' for RegExp's. In your case
PS> (?s)#.*~
PS> should do it.
Elsewhere is this thread is my thanks for your
Hi Januk,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 7:00:46 PM, you wrote:
JA> I can't help you with the text extraction part, but hopefully I can
JA> shed some light on the pattern match.
JA> I'm guessing you have some delimiters that you know are at the
JA> beginning and end of the section of text you wa
Hi Peter,
Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 4:02:31 PM, you wrote:
PS> (?s)#.*~
PS> should do it.
It does indeed. Thanks for the solution. Unfortunately as I earlier
wrote Januk (elsewhere in this thread), I also need to be able to
extract the text once found and place it into a reply. I can do
15 matches
Mail list logo
