on Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:37:03 -0500 Jonathan Angliss wrote:
How come your message didn't thread? I looked at the source and
couldn't find a References header. I know TB generates it. Been
playing?
JA Notice there is a Resent-From header? It looks like he'd sent it,
JA but for some reason it'd
on Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:02:01 -0500 Jonathan Angliss wrote:
You can scan for the presence of the found to be clean (or something)
Header that the virus adds when sending mail, plus the absence of a
message-ID... thats the virus.
JA You cannot really guarantee that. Some MTAs add their own
on Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:40:27 +0200 I already wrote to you:
but somehow GMX or someone else has done sth, as I didn't get any new
the last hour..?!
| Actions: faDelServer,faoRegExp,faFlag,faoHotKey,faoAdvIsAttach,faoAdvLarger
guess, this is the faDelServer action. I thought, it would first
Hello daniel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:52:37 +0200 (MEST) GMT (22/08/2003, 03:52 +0700 GMT),
daniel hahler wrote:
but somehow GMX or someone else has done sth, as I didn't get any new
the last hour..?!
| Actions:
faDelServer,faoRegExp,faFlag,faoHotKey,faoAdvIsAttach,faoAdvLarger
guess, this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
How come your message didn't thread? I looked at the source and
couldn't find a References header. I know TB generates it. Been
playing?
Notice there is a Resent-From header? It looks like
5 matches
Mail list logo