Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?

2004-09-29 Thread Sander van den Berg
On 29-9-2004, 10:25, Nick Dutton wrote: ND Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote: SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin. SvdB But it does not exist... :-( ND ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years ND

Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?

2004-09-29 Thread Code 2
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do others think? IL Most probable that it been taught badly. IL It doesn't meter which one program do you use, K9, POPFile, ... all of IL them have exactly

Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?

2004-09-29 Thread Lynn
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 5:42:48 AM, you wrote: IL 10-20 messages and 90% accuracy of filtering. IL A few hints, if you have subscribed to any mailing IL lists, don't mark IL messages as NOT Junk, put them in white list. IL White list and black list what you can and let the IL filter to

Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?

2004-09-29 Thread Lynn
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:10:36 AM, you wrote: RO I'd drop it as soon as possible. Drop what, the account? I suppose it's worth considering ... -- Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net TBv.3.0.0.14 NT5 SP4

Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?

2004-09-29 Thread Lynn
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote: RO Yep, anything that gets far more spam than legit RO mail isn't worth RO maintaining. No doubt you are right, but I'm having some trouble training some my correspondents to use the other address :-( I'll NAG them! lol! tnx, -- Lynn