Re[2]: threading title

2005-07-01 Thread lee walters
Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:44:12 PM, you wrote: lee walters @ 2005-Jul-1 3:37:39 PM threading title mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I always loved the threading in previous versions of The Bat, but now in the latest version it has the name of the sender as a title, and you have to click the little

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-20 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Marck, That one's in the oven ;-). Stefan says he's added the function and really likes it. It will be in with the next beta series. Actually, Stefan says it will be available in 3.5 post-release :-) -- Best regards, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-19 Thread Steve Lee
1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right window 'Current items' the context menu that you get when you right click on the

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-19 Thread Steve Lee
It was Miguel, but I can tell you anyway. Right click any old toolbar and choose Customise there. Silly me. I wrote to Miguel and gave your name. Thanks for the help. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-19 Thread Steve Lee
Hello Steve, Hi Marck, I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I could not find where to Open Customise. Your assistance here would be greatly appreciated. Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has already given you an answer. Yes

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-15 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Richard, ST I've added two more options to space bar ST reading today: to move to the next unread message (requested before) ST and to mark message as read when taking off the current message. RW Hooray! thanks a lot for that. No problem. I'm starting to think that I'm getting addicted to

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Lee
You can Customise that. I was used to using Return in VA and I have always used it in TB and still do I bet you can not remember how to set the return key to move to next unread message! If you can please do share it as that would be fantastic. I tried to work it out but can not. I also

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Keeping important messages in the Inbox is suicide. That's a substantiated fact. Messages are being added to and deleted from the folder continually. You think NT or 9x are stable enough to guarantee no glitches when data is being moved that frequently? I don't! To be honest Marck, I have

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
I wonder if you remember me. I certainly do Miguel. YOu were very active in the VA Yahoo Group (more or less ran it yourself). Which reminds me The Bat! folks - when we have highlighted some text in a READ message why not provide a button on the SEND message that pastes any highlighted

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Normally it is a bad idea to keep too many messages in the In- and Outboxes. Why do you say that Peter? -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Hello Steve, my old friend! ;-) We still have an outstanding drink date. Marck - I did not know you cared! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
F4 works, but I still think that the reply button should do the same. I find neither f4 (gives me a spell checker) or shift-replybutton does it. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Ah - too late! You're already editing the reply. You should do as suggested (F4 or shift-reply) while looking at the original message. Not on my Pro version it doesn't. I am sitting on the message, highlighted the text to be quoted, pressed f4 (or shift reply) and all it does is open a new

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Have you defined/revised templates? What's your Reply template? Oh dear - I can see where this is leading. YOu can have what you want with TB as long as you (a) do not screw the defaults or (b) create the settings yourself. I am not knocking that, it will ultimately lead to a more powerful

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
find that it only works once I grab a terminating newline H, not here (see above). ;-) This is hilarious. We are all using different programs! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
%Quotes %Cursor That was the one. %Quotes. Thank you very much indeed everyone. Next question. Is there are away to automatically open any threads with unread messages to save having to click one's way down the chain? -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Ah. Okay. Slight caveat - and I keep meaning to get this in as a BugTraq issue - If you only have one line marked, it quotes nothing. I find that it only works once I grab a terminating newline to finish it off. No - tried that one thanks - I suspect the template theory Marck -- Best

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
It's a pity that development stopped, I don't see lack of HTML handling as an issue though, it gets deleted automatically here. In my new business I deal with a lot of tour managers who send me html formatted emails as well as attachments. -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
F4 works, but I still think that the reply button should do the same. I agree! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re[2]: Threading

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Lee
Would View/Display/Only unread messages do what you're looking for? Not really as it hides the threads completely! -- Best wishes, Steve Lee http://jumbocruiser.com Tel +44 7768 211612 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re[2]: threading configuration

2004-09-22 Thread P.Johnson
Hi Maurice, On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 8:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS Most notably, my experience shows that people using the following will MS always cause mails to look as if they were new threads: MS * Hotmail (unless used with OE or some Hotmail popper) MS * AOL MS * Earlier

Re[2]: threading configuration

2004-09-21 Thread Jonathan Vangrootloon
Have you tried threading by reference instead of by subject? Yes, but it doesn't work. The replies of only one member of the list are detected as being in the same thread. But thanks for the idea ! My question is : I'm new to this list and i don't speak perfect english.. But i wondered

Re[2]: Threading by reference

2003-03-10 Thread Roberto Machorro
Hi Do you know anything about a port to Linux? I've been using Kylix and BCB under Linux, porting Windows apps took about a day per app on average. From what I understand TB is written in Delphi. Shouldn't be that hard to port and would win a big market for Ritlabs. Roberto Sunday, March 9,

Re[2]: threading by subject

2002-10-18 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 23:44:05[GMT +0700](which was 17:44 where I live) you wrote: TF TB does that all the time after compressing the folders. The main TF message list has the latest message at the bottom, I also have to TF scroll down often. I wish I could make TB go to the

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

2001-02-03 Thread Gergely Vandor
Hello, JA Does your correspondent's e-mail contain the headers: JA In-reply-To: JA References: Prolly not :) And I don't even want to know how I could check :) Text editor maybe? JA These are the headers TB uses for threading by references. If they JA are not there, TB can't thread this way.

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

2001-02-03 Thread Gergely Vandor
Hello Marck, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 3:55:04 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Vandor, Vandor? Marck, I deliberately use the international order for my name here (first name first, while we in Hungary put family names first) so that templates can

Re[2]: threading a conversation?

2001-02-03 Thread Gergely Vandor
Hello Januk, Sunday, February 04, 2001, 4:10:41 AM, you wrote: GV Thanks for the info :) I guess I'd better be content with GV threading by subject... MP ... or persuading your friend to use a "friendlier" email program ;-) MP (I'm kidding- of course). JA (so am I) JA I dunno, the friend

Re[2]: Threading in 1.48

2000-12-17 Thread Jannik Lindquist
Hello Januk, On Monday, December 18, 2000 you wrote: Try the different threading options available under: View - View threads by Thank you for your reply. I guess I was not quite clear - what I meant was: could someone please explain (what appeared to me as) *the defective* side of TB's

Re[2]: Threading?

2000-09-21 Thread Susanne
Hi A., Thursday, September 21, 2000, 2:47:30 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You may set the view differently for each folder, yes. You however, seem to have 'use default column settings' enabled for each folder. You may access this setting by right clicking

Re[2]: Threading?

2000-09-21 Thread Susanne
Hi A., Thursday, September 21, 2000, 4:32:05 PM, you wrote: IGNORE all that tripe. Just highlight the message, and from the popup menu go to specials and select 'Add sender to address book'. LOL! Okay. I think I'll be happy with just using the above mentioned. If I feel the need to

Re[2]: Threading not always correct?

2000-08-20 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, on Sat, 19 Aug 2000 19:54:45 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 19.08.2000, 20:54:45 (GMT+0200) my local time, you wrote about "Threading not always correct?": snip MDP The explanation runs as follows: every message is assigned a

Re[2]: Threading question

2000-08-08 Thread Windisch Gergely
Hello TBUDL, On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, , Thomas Fernandez wrote: MDP Pass. Many do. Some don't. I haven't researched it. I receive a lot of message sent by Outlook. They don't seem to thread by ref. Let's see: Those that support it: The Bat! :) Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300

Re[2]: Threading question

2000-08-07 Thread Katsmeow
Hi Marck, Monday, August 07, 2000, 12:28:38 PM, you wrote: K I assume that threading by subject threads those messages with the K same subject (although, if so, it does seem to leave some out)? Only if the subject has been changed. Well, for example, I had a folder where there was message

Re[2]: Threading question

2000-08-07 Thread Deryk Lister
We do? Apart from a few unbelievers / nobodys ;) -- DL (snip sig to compensate for OTness) -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:

Re[2]: Threading

1999-11-24 Thread tracer
Wednesday, November 24, 1999 Hello Ali, Tuesday, Tuesday, November 23, 1999, you wrote: AliMarck D. Pearlstone wrote: AM OK, I could rest it in my little webspace and provide a link in the AM future. That would be more suitable a solution in view of the list rule of "no attachments"

Re[2]: Threading

1999-11-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ali, On Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 7:16:40 PM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote: AM snip AM Here it is attached for you and all the other new subscribers who AM haven't yet gotten a copy. Wouldn't it be neat to include this in the .zip file when people download TB from the web site? Or

Re[2]: Threading

1999-11-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 23 November 1999 at 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: The FAQ is unofficial, too, and on Leif's site. If you send the shortcut list to him, perhaps he'll add it to his page. AM Has Leif mysteriously disappeared again? No, he's around. I had a private message from him this

Re[2]: Threading

1999-11-22 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Deryk, DL Any idea what will collapse all threads? It wasn't the obvious DL "control /" :-) no, sorry... I'm looking for that key too :-)

Re[2]: Threading

1999-11-22 Thread tracer
Tuesday, November 23, 1999 Hello Ali, Tuesday, Tuesday, November 23, 1999, you wrote: AliDeryk Lister wrote: Keyboard shortcuts? Ooh, if you have this still I'd love a copy :) I have to say, TB could do with some documentation - it just seems more normal to read how the program works