Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Joseph N.
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote in mid:71879605666.20021031181057;gmx.de: I would suggest to check for the presence of the letter e. It is the most common letter in the English language. MG Oh, is it, truly? I didn't know. MG SCNR MG Regards, MG Markus Nice one (good

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 8:32:08 AM, you wrote: TF Hello Vishal, TF On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:54:27 -0800 GMT (01/11/02, 01:54 +0700 GMT), TF Vishal Nakra wrote: In Eudora I could use the 'exists' option to do this. TF In the TB filters, wouldn't do Presence in subject the trick? I am TF

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thanks..sounds good. What does the period before the * mean, btw, in the other solution you gave. -Vishal Thursday, October 31, 2002, 2:42:58 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Vishal, RO On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:54:27 -0800GMT (31-10-02, 19:54 +0100GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: VN How do I filter out

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 3:19:50 PM, you wrote: G Hi Vishal, G On Thursday, October 31, 2002, 8:11 PM, you mentioned about tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?: V I'm not sure that it will. I'll try it though and see what happens. V Where can I get a reference for regex's

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 3:32:48 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Vishal, RO On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:07:42 -0800GMT (1-11-02, 3:07 +0100GMT, where I RO live), you wrote: RO RO Or enable regexp and check for .* in the subject. VN What does the period before the * mean, RO The period stands for any

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 5:51:31 PM, you wrote: TF The filter conditions you key in there are connected to the TF condition(s) on the Rule tab by a logical OR. ah..finally makes sense. and the ones on the Rule tab are connected to each other by an AND? -vishal

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 5:17:07 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Vishal, MDP 31-Oct-2002, 18:11 -0800 (02:11 UK time) Vishal Nakra [VN] in MDP mid:429607615.20021031181140;myrealbox.com said: TF In the TB filters, wouldn't do Presence in subject

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 5:17:07 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Vishal, MDP 31-Oct-2002, 18:11 -0800 (02:11 UK time) Vishal Nakra [VN] in MDP mid:429607615.20021031181140;myrealbox.com said: TF In the TB filters, wouldn't do Presence in subject

Re[2]: tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 4:11:49 PM, you wrote: G Hi Vishal, G On Thursday, October 31, 2002, 8:48 PM, you mentioned about tricky one - filtering out messages with NO subject?: V I saw the help file, but as with most things TB usually ends up doing V more than it first appears capable of.