Re[3]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 7:55:56 PM, Anne wrote: A It does? I've not found this and I can't find mention of it in TB!'s A help file - where does it lurk please? Options - Preferences - on the Viewer tab - the first box has a drop-down box. It's very nicely done too, imo - you see the

Re[3]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Anne, Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 1:55:56 PM, you wrote: A Monday, October 28, 2002, 11:16:38 PM, Miguel wrote in message A mid:1834822594.20021029001638;ermspain.com MAU Specially when TB already MAU includes a Rich Text Viewer? A It does? I've not found this and I can't find mention of

Re[3]: RTF and /emphasis/

2002-10-29 Thread sjx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 And that's one of the ways Ameol - which I use too - /does/ score over The Bat! It's a small feature, but one I find very valuable. Oh, /that/. I remember that from Fidonet in ages of yore. Don't forget that it does have its disadvantages - it's

Re[3]: RTF

2002-10-28 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote in mid:18721360364.20021028142447;ahsoftware.net: MW Ah... so nothing else would be transmitted, but the email client MW would simply interpret the received text if the proper hints were MW present... that's something quite different from RTF.

Re[3]: RTF

2002-10-28 Thread Mark Wieder
Joseph- Monday, October 28, 2002, 12:55:14 PM, you wrote: JN There might be some decisions that need to be made, but that doesn't JN turn it into a slipper slope, nor does it have anything to do with JN HTML. Appearance is not the biggest problem with HTML, and I agree JN that HTML is not the

Re[3]: RTF

2002-10-28 Thread Vishal Nakra
Monday, October 28, 2002, 12:55:14 PM, you wrote: JN There might be some decisions that need to be made, but that doesn't JN turn it into a slipper slope, nor does it have anything to do with JN HTML. Appearance is not the biggest problem with HTML, and I agree JN that HTML is not the way to