Hi all,
Redirect does not seem to set the Reply-To: line and as such is a
bit useless as I redirect mail from someone and when the intended
receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to me.
Is this a bug?
TIA
--
Ben Kennish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
11 August 2002, 11:22 +0100 Ben Kennish [BK] said:
BK Redirect does not seem to set the Reply-To: line and ... when
BK the intended receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to
BK me.
BK Is this a bug?
No. It's because you have
Hi Ben,
On Sunday, August 11, 2002 at 11:22:15 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
BK Redirect does not seem to set the Reply-To: line and as such is a
BK bit useless as I redirect mail from someone and when the intended
BK receiver gets the email, they end up writing back to me.
BK Is this a bug?
Works
Hi Lars,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:29:05 +0200 (11/08/2002, 12:29 my time),
you [LG] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG When redirecting a message, the original From: is retained, so no
LG Reply-To is needed, I'd say. And if the original message had a Reply-To
LG set, the same
Hello Ben,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:45:50 +0100 GMT (11/08/02, 23:45 +0700 GMT),
Ben Kennish wrote:
BK But out of curiosity, why isn't there an option in the settings
BK that lets you clear reply-to on redirect ?
BK Shall I post it as a feature request?
That is your privilege. Keep in mind that
TF But one thing I would like to advise is that optional settings can be
TF overdone. Please have a look here:
TF http://www.zentrumderarbeit.org/TheBat%21/img/html-kit_preferences.gif
TF (180KB). Credit to Peter Palmreuther.
what's that?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Ricardo,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:28:49 -0300 GMT (12/08/02, 01:28 +0700 GMT),
Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
TF But one thing I would like to advise is that optional settings can be
TF overdone. Please have a look here:
TF http://www.zentrumderarbeit.org/TheBat%21/img/html-kit_preferences.gif
TF
7 matches
Mail list logo
