Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 at 20:50:51 [GMT +] Simon wrote:
really. However, for users who visually check FTP for the file, then perhaps
a plaintext file named with the current version number could be placed in
the folder so that everyone can identify the release. Beyond
Hello Dieter,
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 10:18:18 AM, you wrote:
DH It would be helpful to put the file which normally inform us about the
DH changes a new version has undergone, as 'descript.ion' or 'index.txt' or
DH 'index' into the same ftp directory as the executable or zipped beta.
DH
Hello Nick,
On Saturday, March 11, 2000 you wrote:
The file 'thebat.exe' is the main executable only. The file the_bat.exe is
the full install.
It would have been far less confusing to name the full install tb1.41.exe
for instance, and the executable could then retain the name thebat.exe I
Hi Christopher,
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:00:58 +0100GMT (12/03/2000, 21:00 +0800GMT),
Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
CJT I asked for this change long long ago, but I was told that this is to
CJT ensure that all the links always refer to the newest version. And
CJT after some thinking I
Christopher, dia duit!
On Sunday 15/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Nick @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
big scissor snip
C I asked for this change long long ago, but I was told that this is to
C ensure that all the links always refer to the newest version. And
C after some thinking
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
"File not found" is what I'm getting.
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta/thebat.zip
This one does download.
Douglas
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:42:08 -0600 GMT (11.03.2000, 16:42 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
^^
DH "File not found" is what I'm getting.
The file name is thebat.exe (unlike in the directory
Hello Thomas all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 3:13:03 AM, Thomas wrote in response to my saying:
DH ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/thebat.exe
^^
DH "File not found" is what I'm getting.
TF The file name is thebat.exe (unlike
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:42:08 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
"File not found" is what I'm getting.
I just double checked it and it works.
--
CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.41 *:* Windows NT5 (Build 2195 )
---
** Originality is the art of
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:13:03 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DH ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe
^^
DH "File not found" is what I'm getting.
The file name is thebat.exe (unlike in the directory name, there is no
underscore in the file
How-do-you-do,
Allie Martin posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
AM It was I who gave the ftp URL. I
AM used it to download my copy which is in front of me now and is called
AM the_bat.exe. I tried the URL and it works.
I also used the FTP URL you posted and the file
On Saturday, March 11, 2000, 5:54:01 AM, Simon wrote:
How-do-you-do Douglas,
The file 'thebat.exe' is the main executable only. The file the_bat.exe is
the full install.
It would have been far less confusing to name the full install tb1.41.exe
for instance, and the executable could then
Hello Nick,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 at 06:33:52 [GMT -0800], you wrote:
The file 'thebat.exe' is the main executable only. The file
the_bat.exe is the full install.
NA It would have been far less confusing to name the full install
NA tb1.41.exe for instance, and the executable could then retain
On Saturday, March 11, 2000, Leif Gregory wrote:
I once asked RITLabs why they insisted on keeping the the_bat.exe
filename across different versions, and they said it was so that no
matter what review you read, and no matter how old it was, you would
always be pointed to the most current
Hello Paula,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 at 10:42:42 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
PF The problem with this logic is that mirror sites are often not up
PF to date. You're never sure what version you are getting. I know
PF I've downloaded and installed the same version as I currently have
PF more than once.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:20:34 +0900, Leif Gregory wrote:
Yep, me too. I always grab the latest version from the RITLabs FTP, so
I haven't run into this problem in a while. I didn't say it was right,
only that I understood their reasons.
It's indeed reassuring to see the version number
Hallo Allie,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 11:35:54 -0500 GMT (12.03.2000, 00:35 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM It's indeed reassuring to see the version number in the
AM download. At least you may abort the download when you see that the
AM version is not the desired one. Ritlabs policy
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:33:18 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Q: Why would you download TB if you are already running it?
A: Because you know an update is available.
Or you're downloading it for the first time off a mirror site
and aren't really sure which is the latest version. At
Hello Nick all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 8:33:52 AM, Nick wrote in response to Simon
Says (sorry, I couldn't resist that):
The file 'thebat.exe' is the main executable only. The file
the_bat.exe is the full install.
NA It would have been far less confusing to name the
Leif wrote:
NA It would have been far less confusing to name the full install
NA tb1.41.exe for instance, and the executable could then retain the
NA name thebat.exe I don't know about the others, but I found them to
NA be confusing, listed as they were.
LG I once asked RITLabs why they
20 matches
Mail list logo
