Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-04 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello John, On 3 Sep 2004 at 02:30:05 +1000 GMT [18:30 CEST] you wrote: JP As a matter of interest, does anyone know if RTitlabs read this list at all? At least some of them do. I remeber Stef and 9Val posting here in the past. -- Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on Andre

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-03 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jack, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 13:55:46 [GMT-0500] (which was Thu, 4:55:46 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: I'll never recommend it to anyone again, or at least until someone at Ritlabs reads a book on business ethics. As a matter of interest, does anyone know if RTitlabs read this

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread John Phillips
Hi Mike, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 04:51:20 [GMT+0100] (which was 13:51:20 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: JM 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the JM Professional Edition? The Professional Edition is twice the size (8.2M as opposed to 4.0) Apart from

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Jack, ...especially anything regarding the user interface, which was supposed to be *new* (Amongst all the improvements the most visually outstanding is the new look user interface...). Are you using a glyphs.bmp? If so, go into Preferences and untick High colour images and re-start TB.

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Anne
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:16:29 AM, Jack wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] J 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the J Professional Edition? As I understand it the Home version is the existing TB! that we're all used to, and the Pro version includes

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Allie Martin
Anne, [A] wrote: As I understand it the Home version is the existing TB! that we're all used to, and the Pro version includes the features previously found in SecureBat - i.e. hardware tokens etc. To add to that, all the Security features available previously available in SecureBat! are not

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 22:16:29 -0500, @ @ when Jack Morrison wrote: PS: Memo to self: Never, ever upgrade to another version of The Bat! without there being a GOOD reason to do so. I should have known

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Mica, ...so the customer is able to *see* what s/he has in mind to buy. You can download it and trial it for one months before deciding if you'd want to upgrade. Isn't that enough? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 08:02:14 [GMT-0500] (which was 23:02:14 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: To add to that, all the Security features available previously available in SecureBat! are not only there but are optional. They are actually switched off by default. Where do I

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 16:45:37 +0200, @ @ when MAU wrote: Hello Mica, ...so the customer is able to *see* what s/he has in mind to buy. You can download it and trial it for one months before deciding if

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Mica Mijatovic, 01-Sep-2004 18:56, you wrote: It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially estimating something new) anything more seriously with a slapping popups, constant interruptions and disabled features around? So, the v3 trial isn't only time-limited, but

Re[2]: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASK So, the v3 trial isn't only time-limited, but also lacking functionality? No, it's just time limited -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Jack, Why would I want to revert back to a set of standard glyphs that I rejected once before? I thought you wanted to take a look at the new icons, that's all. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 18:56:39 +0200, @ @ when Mica Mijatovic wrote: Another essential thing, which causes such attitude, is *relationship* an author/company builds toward its customers/users. This is a

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Mica, It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially estimating something new) anything more seriously with a slapping popups, constant interruptions and disabled features around? Yes. TB's _only_ popup is when starting it to remind you how many of evaluation you still

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Anne
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:53:08 PM, MAU wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M Yes. TB's _only_ popup is when starting it to remind you how many of M evaluation you still have left. Many software do that. It also happens when you click to create a new account Miguel. -- Cheers,

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread MAU
Hello Anne, It also happens when you click to create a new account Miguel. Sorry, I didn't know that. I haven't created a new account in many months. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 22:53:08 +0200, @ @ when MAU wrote: Hello Mica, MAU. :-) It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially estimating something new) anything more seriously with a

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-09-01 Thread Anne
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:55:31 PM, Jack wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] J Now, let's count the days before Ritlabs actually confirms that, okay? Jack they already did - Maxim posted earlier about it which is where I read it. -- Cheers, Anne Registered Linux user #345132

TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-08-31 Thread aceman
Well, this is merely my take on it but, to cut a long story short TB! v3 (Yes, that's right. Final release apparently) is out tomorrow. it's out, I'm running it :) Yes, I'm trying it out now too. I'll reserve judgement on it for now :) (TBH, I thought it was a misprint or something

Re[2]: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

2004-08-31 Thread Mike email (The Bat!)
Hi Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:16:29 AM, Jack Morrison wrote: JM 2. What exactly *are* the differences between the Home Edition and the JM Professional Edition? The Professional Edition is twice the size (8.2M as opposed to 4.0) -- Best regards, MFPA