Maksym-
Saturday, January 17, 2004, 8:47:02 PM, you wrote:
I've never had any problems with locking in a multi-user environment,
but then I'm using v1.63.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Hello Maksym,
Sunday, January 18, 2004, 6:47:02 AM, you wrote:
MK I'm now curious to know whether version 2.x has any sort of
MK locking implemented.
What kind of locking is meant exactly? Message bases cannot be damaged
by accessing from different workstations because files are locked when
Hello Stefan,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:27:30 +0200 GMT (18/01/2004, 16:27 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
What kind of locking is meant exactly? Message bases cannot be damaged
by accessing from different workstations because files are locked when
something is being written into a message
Hello Stefan.
nice to see developers continue to read the list, - same as it used to
be 2 years ago :).
Sunday, January 18, 2004, 11:27:30 AM, you wrote:
ST What kind of locking is meant exactly? Message bases cannot be damaged
ST by accessing from different workstations because files are
Hello,
it is really nice to be on TBUDL again (I used to be a subscriber long
ago). I'm now curious to know whether version 2.x has any sort of
locking implemented. I've read some discussions on that subject by
Thomas Fernandez and others back in March 2003; now I'm trying version
2.02.03CE, and
Hello Maksym,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 06:47:02 +0200 GMT (18/01/2004, 11:47 +0700 GMT),
Maksym Kozub wrote:
it is really nice to be on TBUDL again (I used to be a subscriber long
ago). I'm now curious to know whether version 2.x has any sort of
locking implemented. I've read some discussions on
6 matches
Mail list logo
