Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
Can anyone think of anything?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL
Hallo tb,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
You could use a CC:, that'll show in the delivered
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 5:01:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail
Hallo tb,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:22:25 -0600GMT (29-1-04, 0:22 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a
tko To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this message look like.
Okay, I'll try it telnetting
--
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:09:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
the message To, BCC, basics
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
Using telnet to access the SMTP
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message
without a To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this
message look like.
As a note... if you're seeing emails with a BCC header appearing, then
the sending
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 6:22:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
the message To, BCC, basics
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I could send you a message without a To: header and it'll still be
delivered. Nor would I need a CC or a BCC, I couldn't do it with
TB, but that's not the issue here
7 matches
Mail list logo
