Hello Marck!
On Saturday, February 9, 2002 at 3:05:08 AM you wrote:
No there wasn't. It was as simple as 'o' and TAB (which, on the second
line, lines up with the indent on the first, etc.).
Smart Tabs enabled.*
*We will run into trouble shortly: Smart Tab, SmartBat, SmartPad -
anythyng as
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
get the opportunity to extract them.
I have a shortcut
Hello Mary,
08. februar 2002, 15:09:37, you wrote:
MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?
It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
proprietary format.
MC 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly
Jernej Simoni wrote:
MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?
It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
proprietary format.
I don't have wide experience of other mailreaders, just Netscape and
Eudora, and I've never
On Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, Mary wrote:
MC What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
MC write a message and then add bits to it, as most people do, the
MC wrapping automatically puts itself right; you don't have to mess about
MC with ALT-L or wade through
Hello Mary,
Friday, February 08, 2002, 9:48:07 AM, you wrote:
MC I've given up using autoformat (or was it justify on wrap?), because
MC it deletes the paragraph marks, and it's too much trouble to hit enter
MC twice at the end of each paragraph.
MC It may sound like no big deal, but when you
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:09:37 +0100GMT (8-2-2002, 15:09 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?
There is no 'like normal mailreaders do'. Recently somebody posted an
attachment with outlook 2000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
On 08 February 2002 at 15:48:07 +0100 (which was 14:48 where I live)
Mary Cassidy wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I meant was that with Netscape and Eudora, for example, if you
write a message and then add bits to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 08 February 2002 at 10:48:25 -0500 (which was 15:48 where I live)
David Denton wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am finding the TB! editor is growing on me to the point that,
after a month or so of using it, I
On Friday, February 08, 2002, at 16:09:37, Mary wrote about:
Wish list (was: Microsoft attachment)
I have a shortcut to fentun in a desktop folder. The shortcut
specifies Start in the same folder. I save my attachment to that
folder, open the folder, drag the file onto fentun, extract
Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
(keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
configuration.
TB is actually pretty good, but it would be
On 08 February 2002 at 4:00 pm Jonathan wrote:
Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
(keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need extension-specific
AS I think the problem is that TB!'s editor is deliberately _not_ like
AS other editors in many ways. That doesn't mean that it's wrong, but the
AS ubiquity of Microsoft applications (and copies of the way they do
AS things) exerts enormous hidden pressure to always do things the same
AS way.
ON Friday, February 08, 2002, 3:09:37 PM, you wrote:
Mary 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary text editor?
You better stand back and take cover :(
Mary Otherwise, I really like it :-)
To late now ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Insert Cookie Here--
Hello Gerard!
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:50:04 PM you wrote:
Mary 3. Please could somebody do something about TB's incredibly primitive
Mary text editor?
You better stand back and take cover :(
Another of the good tips to follow: Look for the word editor in the
archives:
1.
Thanks Marck, your explanations are really helping me better
understand this ( even though I'm not totally getting the whole line
return thing, but that's just my ignorance, I'll work on understanding
it better ).
Totally not related to the topic, but Marck, did you modify your
reply template to
Hello Jonathan!
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 5:00:16 PM you wrote:
Use a high end editor (like Multi Edit, Slick Edit, etc) and see if you feel the
same way! The number one feature that distinguishes these are _configurability_
(keymapping, toolbar, etc) although TB wouldn't the need
Hello Rick,
08. februar 2002, 19:46:48, you wrote:
reply text here
RR That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
RR where I would simply indent my response under the blocks of reply
RR text. Your way looks much more clear.
This happened because your original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
On 08 February 2002 at 11:31:39 -0500 (which was 16:31 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secnario II - Auto-Format On.
Well now when I go back and add text things wrap fine, so
Hello Jonathan,
08. februar 2002, 22:28:31, you wrote:
snip
JW TB's Shift-F7 and Ctrl-F7 are like nothing else I've seen. I find
JW them quite awkward (in general I prefer one handed keyboard short
JW cuts.)
Look at Norton Commander's (and it's clones') editor :)
JW 2) Reformatting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
On 08 February 2002 at 13:46:48 -0500 (which was 18:46 where I live)
Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reply text here
That is really cool, and I like it much better than how I was doing it
where I
21 matches
Mail list logo
