Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Dave, Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:08:47 AM, you wrote: JD Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped JD mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force JD the mail to wrap at 80 columns? Oh how I wish for that feature. :) DG Hear, hear! :) Stefan, that's

Re[2]: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, all: JD Hello Dave, JD Thursday, September 11, 2003, it was written: JD Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped JD mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force JD the mail to wrap at 80 columns? Oh how I wish for that feature. :) I am now using Januk

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread myob
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:04:54 +0100 GMT(11/09/2003, 12:04 PM + GMT), Jamie Dainton wrote: JD Hello Dave, JD Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:08:47 AM, you wrote: ... JD Stefan, that's three people who'd like this feature. Make that four! Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0

Re[2]: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread Allen
myob, m On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:04:54 +0100 GMT(11/09/2003, 12:04 PM m + GMT), Jamie Dainton wrote: JD Hello Dave, JD Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:08:47 AM, you wrote: m ... JD Stefan, that's three people who'd like this feature. m Make that four! ...and an enthusiastic fifth!

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, September 11, 2003, 4:06:21 PM, you wrote: A myob, m On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:04:54 +0100 GMT(11/09/2003, 12:04 PM m + GMT), Jamie Dainton wrote: JD Hello Dave, JD Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:08:47 AM, you wrote: m ... JD Stefan, that's three people who'd like this

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread myob
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:27:11 +0200 GMT(11/09/2003, 3:27 PM + GMT), Gerard wrote: G ON Thursday, September 11, 2003, 4:06:21 PM, you wrote: G I hope this isn´t the start of a ME TO thread. Not even a ME TOO one :-) But I think it's useful to indicate when suggestions for a formal request

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread MAU
Hello Gerard, I hope this isn´t the start of a ME TO thread. Me too! ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-11 Thread Allie Martin
David R. Austen, [DRA] wrote: DRA I am now using Januk Aggarwal's excellent wrap templates DRA http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap DRA (%QINCLUDE=wq) DRA for (replies and forwards) and also hope to accomplish wrapping on DRA redirects, too. (Ideas?) FWIW, I use redirect

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-10 Thread Allie Martin
Jamie Dainton, [JD] wrote: JD It seems some mail clients are incapable of wrapping mails at a JD sensible limit. Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped JD mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force JD the mail to wrap at 80 columns? Oh how I wish for that

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-10 Thread Dave Goodman
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, Allie Martin wrote: JD Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped JD mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force JD the mail to wrap at 80 columns? Oh how I wish for that feature. :) Hear, hear! :) -- Dave Goodman The Bat!

Wrapping recieved mail correctly

2003-09-09 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hi All, It seems some mail clients are incapable of wrapping mails at a sensible limit. Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force the mail to wrap at 80 columns? -- Jamie Dainton [EMAIL PROTECTED]