Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:57:37 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 12:57 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF That's a bug in the list server software then. It should ignore
TF any X-headers it doesn't have a clue about.
MDP Usually it does - but not these.
The list server software finds
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 08:09:14 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 14:09 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
MDP It's open source - you get what you pay for!
I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-)
MDP I'm not about to rewrite the
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 13:12 +0700 (06-Apr 07:12 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
TF the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
It's open source - you get what you pay for! I'm not about to
rewrite the module myself and the team responsible
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 14:23 +0700 (06-Apr 08:23 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
TF the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
MDP It's open source - you get what you pay for!
TF I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-)
Precisely! :-).
Hi List,
Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this reply (and a corresponding
delay in posting):
Your mail to 'TBUDL' with the subject
Re[2]: IMAP Filtering
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has a
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 14:56 -0700 (05-Apr 22:56 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUL:
CB Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this
CB reply (and a corresponding delay in posting):
Message has a suspicious header
... snip
CB For
Hi Marck,
MDP Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was meaning
MDP to write to you - you may just get a warning - I actually have to
MDP approve your posts manually each time :-(.
What does that mean? I don't understand. First, whats wrong with the scanners? Why are
they
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 15:42 -0700 (05-Apr 23:42 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was
MDP meaning to write to you - you may just get a warning - I
MDP actually have to approve your posts
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 5, 2004, 6:14:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP standards.
I have also had my messages held by the list software (hopefully my
headers are now
At 7:14 PM on 4/5/2004, Marck D Pearlstone typed ...
M Bill Blinn also had such headers added to his messages and was kind
M enough to either turn them off or use an alternate routing that
M didn't add them. Please consider doing the same. I'd really
M appreciate it if I didn't have to keep
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:14:33 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 06:14 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP standards.
IIRC X- headers don't break any
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 12:35 +0700 (06-Apr 06:35 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
CB How could information that was intended to curb abuse be
CB suspicious?
MDP Because it does not conform to standards - any standards.
TF Except the RFC dealing with
12 matches
Mail list logo
