V I know that, but instead of this, I offered an other solution. I
V just wanted to point out that David (the original question
V asker) wrote that : Of course, I've set it up this way and it
V works perfectly and wondrously. And email sent to both of us is
V also being downloaded by both
On Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 7:55:12 PM, Vili wrote, and now David
Huber on Friday, June 17, 2005 at 2:52:51 PM responds.
V I know that, but instead of this, I offered an other solution. I
V just wanted to point out that David (the original question
V asker) wrote that : Of course, I've
Hi
On Friday 17 June 2005 at 8:59:15 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Huber wrote:
And I assume that since I'm having the email of both of us sent to one
fastmail.fm account, that the fastmail.fm must be getting two copies
of any email sent to both of us (though i don't know that for
DH Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Could you not set the filter to: Recipient Does Not Contain
SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] then Ignore.
DH Ah, well, that is so utterly an obvious solution that I am most
DH embarrassed. Of course, I've set it up this way and it works
DH perfectly and wondrously. And
Hello Vili,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 4:29:04 AM, you wrote:
V How can it work for emails that is sent to both of you?
V As the above rule is false of emails sent to both of you, person1 will
V download it. How can person2 download it then later? If your setup is
V symmetric, the download
Hi
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 at 11:02:26 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Vili wrote:
So, if you get a mail that is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND
[EMAIL PROTECTED], the quickest person will download it, so, you have to
setup an incoming filter to redirect this kind of mails:
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2005 at 2:18:52 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
You can just set it to leave a copy on the server. Then set it for
Leave for x days and it will be deleted after that period of time.
And on occasions when one person is absent for more than x
Hello Stuart,
V How can it work for emails that is sent to both of you?
V As the above rule is false of emails sent to both of you, person1 will
V download it. How can person2 download it then later? If your setup is
V symmetric, the download cannot be symmetric as the ACCESS TIME (when
V you
DH So I am [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I have my filter set to ignore all
DH email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DH My office mate, [EMAIL PROTECTED], has hers set to ignore all email to
DH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DH Mostly this works perfectly, except for when someone sends email to
DH both of us - then The Bat! on
Hello Stuart,
DH Any thoughts on how to solve this problem in The Bat!?
Could you not set the filter to:
Recipient Does Not Contain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then Ignore.
Yes, I agree that should work.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.25
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Could you not set the filter to: Recipient Does Not Contain
SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] then Ignore.
Ah, well, that is so utterly an obvious solution that I am most
embarrassed. Of course, I've set it up this way and it works perfectly
and wondrously. And email sent to both of
Hello David,
Wednesday, June 15, 2005, 11:27:29 AM, you wrote:
DH Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Could you not set the filter to: Recipient Does Not Contain
SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] then Ignore.
DH Ah, well, that is so utterly an obvious solution that I am most
DH embarrassed. Of course, I've set it up
We have two of us in my office who get email on our own domain, but
which is hosted at fastmail.fm, so the domain is sort of virtual. All
email sent to us is redirected to one fastmail.fm account. I set up
The Bat! on both our computers, and use selective download on each one
to ignore each
Hello David,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:50:43 -0500 GMT (15/06/2005, 00:50 +0700 GMT),
David Huber wrote:
DH Selective Download, for some myopic reason, only allows one to ignore
DH or kill an email - there is no setting to say please download this
DH one, which would solve our problem. It would be
Hello David,
Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 12:50:43 PM, you wrote:
DH Any thoughts on how to solve this problem in The Bat!?
Could you not set the filter to:
Recipient Does Not Contain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then Ignore.
--
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:51:07 AM, Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
Yes. I overlooked that. Thanks. But how do I define a filter: 'Delete
all messages with attachments UNLESS they originate from my mailing
lists'
I don't think that you can using Selective Download, as the filters
are not that
Hi Julian,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 11:55:40 +0100 GMT (Aug 31, 16:40 my local time),
you [JBL] wrote:
JBL The way I deal with these situations is to use a kill filter to
JBL wipe messages that I *know* I don't want, and then use an ignore
JBL filter for all the ones that I need to double-check.
Hallo Sudip,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:13:33 +0545GMT (31-8-02, 15:28 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
SP That's a good idea but I've decided to kill all messages with
SP attachments that have OE X-mailer header... serves my purpose :)
That's just as mind blind as an ISP refusing mail with an
Sh'mae The,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, at 20:54:43 [GMT +0200] (or 19:54 in Wales)
regarding 'Urgent Help with Selective Download' you wrote:
SP That's a good idea but I've decided to kill all messages with attachments
SP that have OE X-mailer header... serves my purpose :)
RO That's just as mind
Hi Roelof,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 20:54:43 +0200 GMT (Sep 01, 00:39 my local time),
you [RO] wrote:
RO That's just as mind blind as an ISP refusing mail with an TB
RO X-Mailer header.
I'm a strong advocate against the ISP policy of filtering mails based
on X-mailer header, but an individual user
Hi Batpeople,
I'm getting bombarded with W32.Magistr.24876@mm worm and its
variants. Since yesterday, I've been getting 30+ infected
messages/per day ! Almost all of these mails have originated from
senders within my ISP's domain: ntc.net.np. And, needless to say,
most of these
Sudip-
How about filtering everything from domain ntc.net.np into the trash
*except* messages from the ISP itself? Something like
destination folder=Trash
ntc.net.npSender Yes
postmasterSender No
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Hi Mark,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:29:17 -0700 GMT (Aug 31, 00:14 my local time),
you [MW] wrote:
MW How about filtering everything from domain ntc.net.np into the
MW trash *except* messages from the ISP itself?
Well, this will still invoke NAV's repair/quarantine process...
something I want to
Hello Sudip!
On Friday, August 30, 2002 at 8:49:51 PM you wrote:
Well, this will still invoke NAV's repair/quarantine process...
something I want to avoid. I'd like all mails, except from the mailing
lists, killed right from the server
So, do the same as suggested only with Selective
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:07:12 +0159 GMT (Aug 31, 00:53 my local time),
you [DH] wrote:
DH So, do the same as suggested only with Selective Download.
Yeah I want to desperately, but how? :)
How do I define 'Kill message if case is X but NOT if case is Y' type
of filter for Selective
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:07:12 +0159 GMT (Aug 31, 00:53 my local time),
you [DH] wrote:
DH So, do the same as suggested only with Selective Download. Getting
DH your mail will take a tad longer since TB! will first Download all
DH headers, compare and filter them, and then delete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:'
SP In fact, if I could define a filter to kill messages with
SP attachments, it should serve my purpose.. but how?
Messages with attachments are usually of the type
Hello Sudip!
On Friday, August 30, 2002 at 9:28:45 PM you wrote:
How do I define 'Kill message if case is X but NOT if case is Y' type
of filter for Selective Download?
Have you had a look at the Advanced tab?
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP
Hi Allie,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:45:34 -0500 GMT (Aug 31, 01:30 my local time),
you [ACM] wrote:
ACM Messages with attachments are usually of the type
ACM multipart/mixed;
ACM You could therefore filter for that string appearing in the Kludges.
Yes. I overlooked that. Thanks. But how do I
29 matches
Mail list logo
