Alexander,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:18:50 PM, you wrote:
>> Sometimes, I truly believe that a thing can be TOO configurable...
ASK> ...and I surely wouldn't want to NOT have this feature. :-)
I wasn't saying that any particular config option should be
removed. Instead I intended to expres
Hello Steven P Vallière & everyone else,
on 25-Sep-2006 at 21:09 you (Steven P Vallière) wrote:
> I'll see if I can figure out enough of the view mode stuff to make it
> work. It certainly is NOT intuitively obvious...
It took me a while to get the grip of the viewmodes. You should define a
cou
Roelof,
Wednesday, September 20, 2006, 8:15:45 AM, you wrote:
SPV>> I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
SPV>> and others NOT threaded.
RO> Create folder view modes according to your wishes and assign them to
RO> your folders as your preferences go.
I'll see if I can figure out e
On Wednesday, September 20, 2006, at 7:08:56 AM, Steven P Vallière wrote:
> If this is possible, where is it hidden?
I'm doing exactly what you want. However I'm not using the properties to
set up the views. I have the global view set to "no view selected", and
then for each folder that I want to
Hallo Steven,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:08:56 -0400GMT (20-9-2006, 14:08 , where I
live), you wrote:
SPV> I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
SPV> and others NOT threaded.
Create folder view modes according to your wishes and assign them to
your folders as your preferences go.
--
I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
and others NOT threaded. In fact, I have FOUR folders
whose messages lists are ALWAYS threaded. But all of
the other folders seems to use the last threading option
I've chosen. I've looked at the folder properties and
not found any threading s
Hello,
2.02. CE, view threads by references, fine, view threads by subject,
no headers, just the '+' boxes.
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Doug and Hel
On Sunday, September 28, 2003 at 02:24 (which was Sunday, September
28, 2003 at 9:24 where I am) Ken Green [KG] wrote:
KG> It appears that there may have been something to the "use account
KG> default settings" but I'm not sure.
It does.
For folders that do _not_ have the 'Use the account defaul
Roelof Otten wrote:
> As he should, since it's a folder specific setting, both in 2.xx as in
> 1.xx
> It's possible that you've enabled in your folder properties 'Use the
> account specific column settings', it's not unlikely that the way to
> threading is copied along with that.
Thanks for your
Hallo ken,
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:49:24 -0500GMT (28-9-03, 6:49 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
kg> I posted about the 'view threads by' setting being account-specific.
kg> Someone replied stating that the thread view is folders-specific.
As he should, since it's a fo
I posted about the 'view threads by' setting being account-specific.
Someone replied stating that the thread view is folders-specific.
Can someone confirm this? For me (v1.62r) it is definitely
account-specific, but I was wondering if the newest version allows
different thread view
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
> When use Alt+1 (or 2, or 3, or 4) to view threads by references
> (or by subject, etc), if there are such e-mails, there will be a
> plus mark in the grouped mails. But when I delete it, this group
> will cha
Hello,
Just another small question here:
When use Alt+1 (or 2, or 3, or 4) to view threads by references
(or by subject, etc), if there are such e-mails, there will be a
plus mark in the grouped mails. But when I delete it, this group
will change location often. I just wonder
Some time around 6/18/2003 19:58:23, I think I heard DZ-Jay say:
<-- SNIP! -->
> except that the first message that starts a thread (the one without a
> "Re:" in the Subject line) is not included in the threads. So I
> always get, for example, a message list like this:
Ugh! Nevermind, I found out
Hello:
I'm subscribed to a particular mailing list that does not set
"In-Reply-To:" or "References:" headers and so I set the "View Threads
By" option for its folder to "Subject", which works pretty well --
except that the first message that st
Hallo Ben,
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:40:50 +0100GMT (19-7-02, 10:40 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
BK> For example, rather than the first message in the thread appearing as
BK> the root of the thread, the last message appears as the root!
Sort on date with descending order and you're done.
-
Hi all,
When I view a folder in "View Threads By...Subject" mode, the threads
seem to be in a weird order.
For example, rather than the first message in the thread appearing as
the root of the thread, the last message appears as the root!
Also, when I expand the thread, I get
Hello Jast,
Wednesday, April 05, 2000, 6:38:57 AM, your (Jast) Message was:
> Morning Aljoscha,
>> I display my mailing lists with "view threads by ... subject".
>> Is there an option to auto-jump to the first unread message
>> (or a key short-cut - I've onl
Morning Aljoscha,
> I display my mailing lists with "view threads by ... subject".
> Is there an option to auto-jump to the first unread message
> (or a key short-cut - I've only ctrl+ß for the last unread message)
Not AFAIK, but for the next unread message press Ct
Hi "The Bat!" Users,
I display my mailing lists with "view threads by ... subject".
Is there an option to auto-jump to the first unread message
(or a key short-cut - I've only ctrl+ß for the last unread message)
TIA,
Jos(c)h.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
