Hello Marck,
Thursday, December 5, 2002, 7:46:44 AM, you wrote:
MDP - --
MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
MDP TB! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
MDP '
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
MDP Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Granville,
@5-Dec-2002, 09:17 Granville Cousins [GC] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GC Mark if you check out your signature on the line that begins
GC with Cheers, at the end of your reply message to me you will see
GC that the
Dierk,
Is is possible to get TB! to integrate with MS Word etc? I'd like to use the
DH Try installing Tb as Simple MAPI handler (it's somewhere in some
DH Preferences of TB).
Oh dear! Making TB! the MAPI handler prevents my (essential) OL2002 plug-ins
from working and still doesn't fix the
Hello Nick!
On Thursday, December 5, 2002 at 1:05:17 PM you wrote:
Oh dear! Making TB! the MAPI handler prevents my (essential) OL2002 plug-ins
from working and still doesn't fix the original problem.
OK, know what you mean. Tried it just now on my XP machine, although
TB told me it had been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people,
I've noticed that when i use the mail dispatcher i have to maximize it
every time. Is it possible to make the maximized possition stick? I
guess there is, only i haven't discovered it as of yet.
Thanks!
- --
- --
/Krister
Hello Roelof,
RO What format does 'Quick View Plus' support for exporting mail?
It cannot export files - merely allows one to view them as
text or ASCII without the original application.
RO BTW You started your question as an answer to another thread. That's
RO not the best thing to do for the
Hello,
I don't know how but I've managed to set one of my accounts to
prohibit attachments.
At first I thought it was my ISP, but it appears that the outgoing
mail with attachment is being blocked by TB but I can't find an
option anywhere to implement that.
I can send fine from my
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 at 15:02:53 + Barry Higginbottom wrote:
I don't know how but I've managed to set one of my accounts to
prohibit attachments.
I don't know how, either, if there's a way.
I can send fine from my other account (different email address but
same ISP)
Maybe the
Hello Bat Folk.
Recently I followed the steps Maxim posted
to obtain a MIME certificate. Worked like a
charm.
However when I look @ it, it shows that I
issued the certificate to myself I'm
wondering if this is right; if not what I
did wrong.
I'm not sure I understand the value
Is there a good reason why TB! omits the first name when one starts to
type (in a recipient field) the last name and the app autocompletes
with only the e-mail address and the complete last name?
[And, on a completely different and off-topic note, has anyone else
noticed that the term 'email' has
Jan,
On Thursday, December 05, 2002, Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JR I'm not sure I understand the value to the
JR msg receiver to know that I issued myself a
JR MIME certificate.
Jan, if you're writing about the free certificates that are available
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, 11:17 AM, you wrote:
well, I tried the TB xmas install, and it broke my ability to receive
mail. After the install, it said it couldn't connect to the mail server.
I re-started mercury, restarted TB and same problem. It could not
connect to my local mail server or
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Paul Cartwright wrote:
well, I tried the TB xmas install, and it broke my ability to receive
mail. After the install, it said it couldn't connect to the mail server.
I re-started mercury, restarted TB and same problem. It could not
connect to my local mail server or the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Jan,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:27:06 -0500 your time, you said:
JR Hello Bat Folk.
JR However when I look @ it, it shows that I issued the certificate to
JR myself I'm wondering if this is right;
No, this is wrong. The self-signed
Hello Ming-Li,
Thursday, December 5, 2002, 3:12:53 PM, you wrote:
ML Maybe the file you're trying to attach is currently open (in use
ML by another program) and TB couldn't access it. It should be easy
ML to check by trying another file.
Nope, tried sending several emails all with different
Myotis Mates,
Is there any way to print a text file from SmartBat? I can't seem to
find a way to do it. Seems to be a pretty fundamental feature, I am
surprised that there seems to be no way to do it...
--
Best regards,
Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
[Using The Bat!
Hello Barry Higginbottom,
On or about Thursday, December 05, 2002 at 17:29:32GMT +
(which was 12:29 PM in the tropics where I live) Barry wrote;
BH Error Message---
BH Message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], subject subject text, cannot be
BH sent because attachments are prohibited for this
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 at 17:29:32 + Barry Higginbottom wrote:
Error Message---
Message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], subject subject text, cannot be
sent because attachments are prohibited for this account
End of Error Message
Ah-ha, the error message prompted to check Network
Barry-
Might depend on what OS you're running and what version of TB. Back in
my old Win95 days with v1.53 I couldn't send attachments unless the
files were stored on the server machine. Don't know if this helps in
your situation, but if it does, try moving the attachment to TB's
directory
Hey Jim,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, December 5, 2002 at 12:38:04 PM.
JD Myotis Mates,
JD Is there any way to print a text file from SmartBat? I can't seem to
JD find a way to do it. Seems to be a pretty
Simon,
On Thursday, December 05, 2002, Simon Blake wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone else with a valid certificate can sign
their messages, you can import their certificate and use it to encrypt mail
to them.
Right. Forgot about that
--
JN
Greetings, all:
I would appreciate your thoughts on this.
I expect it will be a good idea to upgrade my PC (98SE) to XP in the
near future. At the same time, I want to upgrade my version of Bat; I
am still using v. 1.53d.
I am contemplating the following strategy: Have a new hard disk
David,
On Thursday, December 05, 2002, David R. Austen wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DRA My existing software would remain on the C drive, unless and until I
DRA decide on the migration of some software. Eventually I would remove
DRA the OS from that C drive.
I think
Hello David,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:23:13 -0500 GMT (06/12/02, 04:23 +0700 GMT),
David R. Austen wrote:
I expect it will be a good idea to upgrade my PC (98SE) to XP in the
near future.
Could you tell me why? I use Win98 and am still relatively happy. I
have very few crashes, and there is
Thomas,
*** === *** === *** === *** === *** === *** === *** === ***
Thursday, December 5, 2002, 7:20:14 PM, you wrote:
I expect it will be a good idea to upgrade my PC (98SE) to XP in the
near future.
TF Could you tell me why? I use Win98 and am still relatively happy. I
TF have very few
Hello Scott,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:08:09 -0600 GMT (06/12/02, 09:08 +0700 GMT),
Scott Johnson wrote:
I expect it will be a good idea to upgrade my PC (98SE) to XP in the
near future.
TF Could you tell me why? I use Win98 and am still relatively happy. I
I can't think of a good reason other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Thomas,
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:20:14 +0700 your time, you said:
TF I would use the C: drive as the boot drive, D: as the programs drive,
TF and E: as the data drive. At least, that is how my next machine will
TF look like. F: will be
On 05 December 2002, 21:23, David R. Austen wrote:
I am contemplating the following strategy: Have a new hard disk
installed (it would be D:) and use that new drive as the default drive
and boot XP each time.
My existing software would remain on the C drive, unless and until I
decide on the
Friday, December 6, 2002, 4:54:25 AM, you wrote:
FWIW, I recently ran into all sorts of problems with that approach. In
my case, I attempted to dual-boot NT4 and Windows 2000, installing
Windows 2000 to drive D: with an existing NT4 installation on C:
After installing Windows 2000, NT4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 23:24:25 +
Geoff Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I recently ran into all sorts of problems with that approach. In
my case, I attempted to dual-boot NT4 and Windows 2000, installing
Windows 2000 to drive D: with an
30 matches
Mail list logo
