Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
them from my copy of MailWasher.
This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
reduced the spam failures from 100% (really!) to below 54% in two days.
Looking at
Hello Barry,
A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on:
21 February 2005 at 10:05:26 GMT +0100
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Yes please Barry.
--
Best regards,Tony.
* MAU writes:
As many of you know, blaming The Bat! for spam is not an new issue. Look
what I got yesterday:
[...]
Yes, hits=6.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,MDAEMON_SPAM_BLOCKER
version=2.54
**
Start SpamAssassin results 6.50 points, 5 required; * 3.0 -- Message
has
ON Monday, February 21, 2005, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote:
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Hi Barry,
I would love to try them.
How much do the slow down bayesIt?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:47:44 +0100, Gerard wrote:
ON Monday, February 21, 2005, 10:01:40 AM, you wrote:
B If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email the
B file over.
Hi Barry,
I would love to try them.
How much do the slow down bayesIt?
Can you confirm
Hello Barry!
On Monday, February 21, 2005, 3:01 AM, you wrote:
Barry Hi
Barry I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I
extracted
Barry them from my copy of MailWasher.
Barry If anyone else would like to try my rule set let me know and I'll email
the
Barry file over.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:04:35 -0600, Ron Cameron wrote:
Hello Barry!
Send it to my email address below please.
You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well!
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.0.1.33
and BayesIt! 0.8.0
Hello Barry,
A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on:
21 February 2005 at 12:30:15 GMT +0100
B You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well!
Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses Bayesit can try it and
you won't have to send it a dozen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 21 Feb 2005,
@ @ at 08:20:20 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Mica,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 12:41:17 AM, you wrote:
MM Okay. Tell me first do you as well have your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 21 Feb 2005,
@ @ at 17:30:45 +1300, when Allister Jenks wrote:
That's why God (or at least the fellows at Apple) invented the iPod.
:-)
What's that, actually?
- --
Mica
PGP
ON Sunday, February 20, 2005, 6:26:09 PM, you wrote:
W This method is usefully for me because I format often my hard Drive
W because I do many tests. Now, I do not reinstall any more my TB each time. It
W is in the USB key
Hi WilWilWil,
Why not install a second Hard drive in your system and
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 at 09:01:40 +, Barry wrote:
B Hi
B Well I'm still persevering!
B I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
B them from my copy of MailWasher.
B This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
B reduced the spam
I am bamboozled. I get emails from others (not necessarily using The
Bat!) that have this string embedded:
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 18/02/2005
Is this text added automatically to The Bat
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:20:31 +, Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Barry,
A reminder of what Barry on TBUDL typed on:
21 February 2005 at 12:30:15 GMT +0100
B You'll have to drop me a line Ron, Gmane hides your identity very well!
Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses
Hello Barry,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:01:40 GMT + (which was 10:01:40
where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of More observation on Bayesit!:
Hi
Well I'm still persevering!
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I
On Monday, February 21, 2005, 11:19:09, Paul Stephen wrote:
Is this text added automatically to The Bat messages or do I have to
write my own macro to add this? (The AVG plug-in works fine.)
I wouldn't bother to add it. Nobody should rely on what a message says.
It just gives a false sense of
Hello Paul,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 10:19:09 GMT -0600 (which was 17:19:09
where I live), Paul Stephen wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of AVG Certification Message:
I am bamboozled. I get emails from others (not necessarily using The
Bat!) that have this string
Hello Barry,
I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted
them from my copy of MailWasher.
This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now
reduced the spam failures from 100% (really!) to below 54% in two days.
this seems to be a great
Hello Dick,
DH This signature is added by the AVG system if you select the
DH option to do so. IMHO, it's totally ridiculous to add such a
DH signature, especially when you have no attachment added.
OK, I agree -- I just wanted to know HOW this is accomplished (for my
own amusement. g)
As I
Dear Barry,
@21-Feb-2005, 17:01 Barry [B] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why not post it to this list, that way everyone who uses Bayesit can try it
and
you won't have to send it a dozen times.
B I thought attachments were not allowed. Marck's slapped my wrist before!
Attachments are
Hello Paul,
On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 11:54:51 GMT -0600 (which was 18:54:51
where I live), Paul Stephen wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of AVG Certification Message:
Hello Dick,
As I stated, I have VERIFY turned on in AVG for both INCOMING and
OUTGOING mail but
Hi rich,
On 21/02/2005 01:21 PM, you wrote:
I would like a selective download filter that looks for and deletes
any mssg with meds (note the leading and trailing spaces) in both
headers bodies.
Will the selective download filter drop the trailing (or leading)
space if I do not specify
Hi
On Monday 21 February 2005 at 5:54:51 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Stephen
wrote:
As I stated, I have VERIFY turned on in AVG for both INCOMING and
OUTGOING mail but nothing is added. I thought this was the OPTION but
no verification text is added to my emails.
You actually said
Hi all,
Recently moved from TB v1.63 to 2.0 and now neither of my manual
filters (hot keys) work. Is this a bug in the new version?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, solutions.
--
Best regards,
Nick
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using
At 18:04 [GMT-0500] on Monday February 21 (actual time - 7:04am on Tuesday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Nick Recently moved from TB v1.63 to 2.0 and now neither of my manual
Nick filters (hot keys) work. Is this a bug in the new version?
Unless this is a message from LONG ago, v2
Mica,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 5:39:50 PM, you wrote:
MM Okay then, less problems to solve. Tell me, do you have some friends, or
MM business partners who do not address you properly, namely not using your
MM full name (or a screen/nick name defined by yourself) in TO (or CC)
MM field, but
Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 1:48:05 AM, Mica wrote:
That's why God (or at least the fellows at Apple) invented the iPod.
:-)
MM What's that, actually?
Essentially, a hard-disk based portable audio player. It's something of
a phenomenon lately...
http://www.apple.com/ipod/
--
Cheers,
27 matches
Mail list logo
