Hi
I am planning to upgrade from v3.0.1.33 to 3.80.03 or 3.80.06.
Any tips (other than back up _everything_)?
Is it best to install over existing version or to uninstall and do
a fresh install?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Don't learn safety rules by accident...
Using
Hi MFPA,
on Sun, 4 Jun 2006 13:55:41 +0100GMT (04.06.2006, 14:55 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
M I am planning to upgrade from v3.0.1.33 to 3.80.03 or 3.80.06.
M Any tips (other than back up _everything_)?
M Is it best to install over existing version or to uninstall and do
M a fresh install?
I
Hi
On Sunday 4 June 2006 at 2:04:48 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns
wrote:
I installed it over the existing version without a problem. And, yes,
you should have a complete backup. :)
Just installed over my existing version. The only glitches I have
found so far are losing my
Hello MFPA everyone else,
on 04-Jun-2006 at 19:55 you (MFPA) wrote:
Is it still needed?
No, its not needed anymore. You can delete it.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
NP: Rhythmism 4 by Ubar Tmar
(from the 1998 album True)
Hello Mary,
Saturday, June 3, 2006, 4:10:00 PM, you wrote:
MB Hello Jack!
MB You could add a confirming note, if you have the time, Jack, at
MB http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5817 ,
MB that the bug is a problem for you, too.
MB That way, if Stefan hasn't had time to get back to the
Hello MFPA!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 12:55 PM, you wrote:
Just updating Rogues and looked at the order.txt file at
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images. It was last modified 6 months
ago and contains the following:-
C:\DOCUME~1\Mike\LOCALS~1\Temp\The Bat! Setup\images\default.msl
C:\Program
Hello Jack!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 12:39 PM, you wrote:
MB You could add a confirming note, if you have the time, Jack, at
MB http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5817 ,
MB that the bug is a problem for you, too.
...
Done. I hope I did it correctly.
Oh, you did do it absolutely
Hi
When I open an attachment it opens with a different name to that
displayed in the message below its icon.
I know this is trivial but it is an irritation if you open an
attachment before saving it.
I have reported this at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5901
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hello MFPA!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 1:53 PM, you wrote:
When I open an attachment it opens with a different name to that
displayed in the message below its icon.
Confirmed.
I know this is trivial but it is an irritation if you open an
attachment before saving it.
I agree.
I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Sunday 4 June 2006 at 7:26:13 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
I should probably leave this for Leif to answer.
But I can tell you that the file Order Text is not necessary. Leif
informed us of this in a message to TBOT sometime in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Sunday 4 June 2006 at 8:09:05 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
Hello MFPA!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 1:53 PM, you wrote:
When I open an attachment it opens with a different name to that
displayed in the message below its icon.
Hello MFPA!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 2:04 PM, you wrote:
I should probably leave this for Leif to answer.
But I can tell you that the file Order Text is not necessary. Leif
informed us of this in a message to TBOT sometime in 2004, I think.
Thanks Mary. I will have missed that as I am not
I moved to a new computer (also from Win2k to XP). Installed the Bat
and loaded the data from the backup made on the old computer.
Everything went smoothly.
However I run into a problem:
On the configuration toolbar I see twice Mark as Junk and Mark as
not Junk. However if I open the Customize
Hello MFPA everyone else,
on 04-Jun-2006 at 20:53 you (MFPA) wrote:
When I open an attachment it opens with a different name to that
displayed in the message below its icon.
It depends on your configuration.
If you store the attachments in the message body, the attachment must be
extracted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Sunday 4 June 2006 at 10:12:13 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
If you store the attachments in the message body, the attachment must be
extracted from the messagebase and saved as a temporary file before
opening it. Thats the
Hi,
I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I
returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual
memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently
using 512MB of VM!
Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption?
--
-=
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 at 23:12:13 +0200, Alexander wrote:
If you store the attachments in the message body, the attachment must be
extracted from the messagebase and saved as a temporary file before
opening it. Thats the different name you're seeing.
If you select to store attachments
Hello Mary,
I just read your response to my note 0017086 and I realized (too late)
that I had not paid enough attention to the text in your note 0016886.
Had I been able to summon the requisite number of functioning brain
cells I would have seen that your comments referred to your screen
font
As some sort of back up I have Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (20060516) with
Enigmail 0.94 at hand. Next to the fact that I like the way Thunderbird
handles PGP/GPG, I notice that Thunderbird finds more spam than the Bat!
with Bayes Filter Plugin v2.04
I do not think that it is a matter of training:
19 matches
Mail list logo
