Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Steve Lamb, On Friday, September 24, 1999, 2:17:08 AM you told us: Great Explanation Steve! Now I will share how do I identify spam and create anti-spam, especially for Dial Up User. TF>> Now, how do you actually set the filter to identify spam, i.e. TF>> make TB tell it apar

Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, September 23, 1999, 1:32:39 PM, Arunas wrote: > This was true perhaps 6-8 months ago. I don't know what kind of spam you are > getting, but mine is addressed to me (well, 95 mails out of 100). I think > this is because their mailagents are getting updated and are capable of > addressing

Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Arunas Norvaisa
On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 21:17:08 PM +0200, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> composed profoundly about 'Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)': SL> Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:49:59 AM, Thomas wrote: >> Now, how do you actually set the filter to identify spam, i.e. ma

Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:49:59 AM, Thomas wrote: > Now, how do you actually set the filter to identify spam, i.e. make TB > tell it apart from legitimate mail? The one that I use which is actually quite simple takes some time to set up but once done it works fine. It also takes a bit

Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 1:19:01 PM (-5 GMT), Marck scribbled: > As Steve Lamb pointed out in his reply, it is fairly academic since > spammers are very briefly lived members of the community. However, I > personally manually drag an offending message to the Anit-Spam accou

Re[2]: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 23 September 1999 at 18:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: SL> Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:30:53 AM, Marck wrote: >> There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a >> 'Hard Core' solution to spam handling. >> .. and here is the content of that missive (a bit big,

Re: Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 23 September 1999 at 18:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: TF>>> The only spam filter I could think of is a kill filter for TF>>> messages addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd appreciate some tips. MDP>> There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a MDP>> 'Hard Core'

Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)

1999-09-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Marck, On Friday, September 24, 1999, 1:30:53 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: TF>> The only spam filter I could think of is a kill filter for TF>> messages addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd appreciate some tips. MDP> There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a M

Re: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:30:53 AM, Marck wrote: > There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a > 'Hard Core' solution to spam handling. > .. and here is the content of that missive (a bit big, but worth it). Actually, it isn't. Bounces don't mean anything t

Re[4]: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 23 September 1999 at 16:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: MDP>> If anyone on the list has any other views to express, I would be MDP>> pleased to hear from you. If it's just a 'Me too', you can send MDP>> that privately. TF> The only spam filter I could think of is a kill filter for TF> me

Re: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 9:32:30 AM (-5 GMT), Marck scribbled: AM>> I visited the site and find it most appealing. I however have a problem AM>> with it and it's that my e-mail address is exposed for everyone to see AM>> and therefor, sets the stage for spamming. Distressing inde

Re[3]: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Marck, On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:32:30 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> I've discussed this with Syafril and we don't really see it as a huge MDP> issue. IMHO address harvesting is more prevalent on UseNet than Web MDP> and spam filtering is not too hard really. MDP> If anyon

Re[2]: List Administration Note

1999-09-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 22 September 1999 at 23:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: >> The TBUDL and TBBETA discussion lists are now being archived in a >> public archive resource ... AM> I visited the site and find it most appealing. I however have a problem AM> with it and it's that my e-mail address is exposed f

Re: Missing TBUDL messages.

1999-09-23 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Christopher J. Trybowski, On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 3:19:20 AM you told us: CJT> Several days ago I have been accidentally unsubscribed from TBUDL (I CJT> dunno why, didn't send any unsub request). Could someone send me CJT> messages from 17,18,19 and 20 September? Thanks.

Re: Missing TBUDL messages.

1999-09-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Christopher, this announcement from Marck of today should make you happy. ;-) > We have now added a new dimension to TBUDL and TBBETA that will, > hopefully, add to its' usefulness. The TBUDL and TBBETA discussion > lists are now being archived in a public archive resource at > [EMAIL PROTECT

Missing TBUDL messages.

1999-09-23 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello everybody, Several days ago I have been accidentally unsubscribed from TBUDL (I dunno why, didn't send any unsub request). Could someone send me messages from 17,18,19 and 20 September? Thanks. -- Christopher J. Trybowski http://wil.linux.krakow.pl/~trybik [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EM

End of message

1999-09-23 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Hi TB, It should be good that the end of the message would be real and when you hit several time too much the down page key, your cursor will be not 4 blank pages under the end of the message text. Regards, -- DOLIST Support Information __