Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:41:02 -0600GMT (25-1-03, 5:41 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MB However, other subscribers to TBUDL are saying that properly
MB written List protocols will over-ride a Poster's reply to
MB configuration.
It's not really a matter of properly written
2. where do i find my liscence key or info to back up so i don't lose
it?
Thomas In the registry. Back up the whole key HKCU / Software /RIT. It also
Thomas contains your settings and stuff.
thank you :)
russ
Current version is 1.62 |
Hello Wayne,
Saturday, January 25, 2003, 5:37:32 AM, you wrote:
Wayne Friday, January 24, 2003 at 11:29 AM (Pacific Time)
Wayne Hello Razgo, This is a reply to your message dated
R 2. where do i find my liscence key or info to back up so i don't lose
R it?
Wayne When I registered about two
Hello James,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:13:42 -0500 GMT (25/01/03, 02:13 +0700 GMT),
James Van Horn wrote:
I know this has been discussed before, but I was hoping to see some
results by now. When toggling between windows, 95% of the time, my Bat
hangs for about 2-5 seconds before the window
Hello Miguel,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 10:17:24[GMT +0100](which was 09:17 where I
live) you wrote:
Are you
using View/View threads by/Reference? That helps a bit.
Certainly am :-)
I also usually have them sorted by creation time too. The trouble is I
sometimes can't even find the original
Hello Mary,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 07:11:40[GMT -0600](which was 13:11 where I
live) you wrote:
I went to the TBUDL folder and tried it. Of course, I had to scroll
for the root, as Thomas terms it, the originating message of the
thread.
Ah, but that's not the one I want either :-)
I want to
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, 8:07 AM, you wrote:
MB I went to the TBUDL folder and tried it. Of course, I had to scroll
MB for the root, as Thomas terms it, the originating message of the
MB thread.
R Ah, but that's not the one I want either :-)
R I want to be able to see the
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 04:15:30 [GMT +] (11:15 PM EST Thu here) Anne
wrote:
Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 3:04:37 PM, Daniel wrote:
DG For example, AOL members address only me (the
DG sender) when they hit [Reply].
I understand from AOL users on some of my genealogy lists that they
have a
Hello Anne,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:12:11 + GMT (25/01/03, 09:12 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
PP Have you chosen the existing archive and the new archive being the
PP same file?
Perhaps a note in the help file to warn of this would be useful for
new users?
Or a kind of blockage, so that you
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 12:31:03[GMT -0600](which was 18:31 where I
live) you wrote:
It was my first post to the wish-list. I got a form letter back, but
at least I know the request is in their files now.
Have you posted yours yet? I saw your post to Miguel that you were
going
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, 4:16 PM, you wrote:
MB It was my first post to the wish-list. I got a form letter back, but
MB at least I know the request is in their files now.
MB Have you posted yours yet? ...
R Yes, I posted mine about 6 hours ago but no form letter back as
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 16:24:19[GMT -0600](which was 22:24 where I
live) you wrote:
I am afraid this exchange will soon be considered OT. Want to say any
more on TBOT?
I don't think so. Just wait and hope that wishes are implemented by
the powers that be :-)
--
Best regards,
Hallo Richard,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:07:15 +GMT (25-1-03, 15:07 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RW I want to be able to see the message that the poster who's message
RW I am reading is replying to and that may be well up the thread if
RW the poster has replied late after others have had
Hello Roelof,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 00:20:44[GMT +0100](which was 23:20 where I
live) you wrote:
When you view threads by references, the message that was replied to
is _always_ one level up.
Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't happen
here. In fact, on inspecting
Hallo Richard,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:13:04 +GMT (26-1-03, 1:13 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
When you view threads by references, the message that was replied
to is _always_ one level up.
RW Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't
RW happen here.
I made a
15 matches
Mail list logo
