Choosing wrong template when the address is also in a address group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I have the following: A address [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is in a address group (XLT) For this group I use a group template to start a new mail. But when I want to mail John seperately (not using the Group) and enter the address in a new mail it will still use the group template and not the general template of the account. This behaviour is common with all mail addresses that are in a group with a group template and also are being used outside of this group. How can I resolve this? The only way I've found is to create the address twice. One within the group and one in my general address book. - -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.04.4, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 This planet has -- or rather had -- a problem, which was this: most of the people living on it were unhappy for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movements of small green pieces of paper, which is odd because on the whole it wasn't the small green pieces of paper that were unhappy. To request my public key select this url: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: A signature is like a handshake. iD8DBQFAUZSimhRF8KnkII4RAlHOAJ9oHxtY7GFHwj6dODXyeqKUx/tDvQCeNtMj EPe+J5RRlbwMfLbgxQ7q+iY= =zvdf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP folder antics
Allie Martin wrote: So the mixup occurs with both clients? I do suspect the IMAP server to not be innocent of this problem. Sorry I wasn't clear. The mixup only occurs in TB! -- I was just pointing out that incoming messages are shown in Inbox in Thunderbird, and in Sent in TB!, but when I move them into TB!'s inbox they seem to disappear from the IMAP server (according to Thunderbird, at least). I can't rule out the IMAP server being (partly) at fault, but I've tried out a few different e-mail clients with it and none of them (except for TB!) have had any problems with it. Guess I'll delete/re-create the account and see how it goes. I can't bear the idea of going back to POP3 for that account (I check my e-mail at several different computers and occasionally on my cell-phone), so hopefully I won't have to give up on TB! -- Sean H. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Some Messages Have Blank Fields
Hi all, I've noticed something a little strange that happens from time to time. Occasionally an e-mail will arrive in an Inbox that has all its details as blank i.e. Blank From: field, blank To: field, blank Subject etc, you get the idea. Essentially everything is blank. Quite often the message body actually contains the relevant e-mail and sometimes it just contains what appears to be fairly random strings of ASCII code. This is not account specific and indeed I cannot seem to isolate any pattern to when they arrive. I always check on my mail server when this happens and these e-mails do not appear there so I presume that TB! is generating them for some reason. Anyone have any ideas? Many thanks Steve Mulhall CMC Partnership (UK) Ltd The Bat version 2.01.3 Windows 2000 SP3 Build 2195 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP folder antics
Sean H., [SH] wrote: SH I can't rule out the IMAP server being (partly) at fault, but I've SH tried out a few different e-mail clients with it and none of them SH (except for TB!) have had any problems with it. Guess I'll SH delete/re-create the account and see how it goes. I can't bear the SH idea of going back to POP3 for that account (I check my e-mail at SH several different computers and occasionally on my cell-phone), so SH hopefully I won't have to give up on TB! I'm interested in how things turn out with this one, so please write back and tell us what eventually happens. -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Some Messages Have Blank Fields
On Friday, March 12, 2004, 6:14 AM, you wrote: SM I've noticed something a little strange that happens from time to SM time. Occasionally an e-mail will arrive in an Inbox that has all its SM details as blank i.e. Blank From: field, blank To: field, blank SM Subject etc, you get the idea. Essentially everything is blank. SM Quite often the message body actually contains the relevant e-mail and SM sometimes it just contains what appears to be fairly random strings of SM ASCII code. This is not account specific and indeed I cannot seem to SM isolate any pattern to when they arrive I have had TB choke on incoming emails lately, that appear to be totally blank- no subject/From/To fields populated. The mail dispatcher sits on that email and fails. I have to manually go to dispatcher, new mail, UNCHECK the receive field ( so it deletes that message) then run dispatcher. the rest of my mails flows to TB and all is well. When I have used the web interface to look at those messages, they obviously have SOME headers, but not much, I consider it SPAM, so I normally don't bother, except to delete them, and keep on truckin. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Mar2004 (4.1.357) (avast! version number) 0403-7 (11.03.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.357 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
unable to save a gif
Hello TBUDL, For some reason I unable to save a gif file attached to email. I have tried using save and save at. What could I be missing?? I am using 2.04 -- Best regards, danger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AntiSpam Via BayesIt! 0.4gm Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Some Messages Have Blank Fields
Hi Roelof Do you check your account or an inbound archive? Are you using pop or imap? Like you I'm using TB and Mailtraq (pop3) and I don't encounter this problem... Both my main account and an inbound archive, also a number of colleagues inboxes as well and this problem occurs on all of these, regardless of type. And I'm using POP to collect from Mailtraq -- Steve Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
where can I find tbudl at gmane
Hello TBUDL I subscribed to news.gmane.org, dunno why but can´t find tbudl. -- regards, Henk. __ The Bat! v2.04.4nl on Windows XP, Pentium III, 550Mhz, 256Mb memory PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID Gossammer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: where can I find tbudl at gmane
Henk De Bruijn, [HDB] wrote: HDB I subscribed to news.gmane.org, dunno why but can´t find tbudl. Look for gmane.mail.the-bat.user -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Recipient's address book-Full name in the To: field
Hi Bats! I want to set a template that modify the To: field using the original address book recipient's name (if existing, of course). For example: the address book entry is: Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what I want: The to: field must be set *the same* as in the address book (I mean the display name), even if I write only the email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or the Last Name (Jones). So, first i write [EMAIL PROTECTED], then, when tabbing to the body, the TO: field is set to Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Is it possible? I tried with the followiong macro in the template, but it doesn't work as I need: %TO='%ABTONAME=%TOADDR' the result is [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Jones. Cheers Jacopo -- __ Jacopo [Italy] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html __ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: where can I find tbudl at gmane
On Friday, March 12, 2004, 15:42:09, Henk de Bruijn wrote: I subscribed to news.gmane.org, dunno why but can´t find tbudl. gmane.mail.the-bat.users -- begin .sig Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/ If the experiment works, you must be using the wrong equipment. -- Patrick's Theorem end Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Recipient's address book-Full name in the To: field
Dear Jacopo, @12-Mar-2004, 15:53 +0100 (12-Mar 02:53 PM UK time) Jacopo Ognibene [JO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JO I want to set a template that modify the To: field using the JO original address book recipient's name (if existing, of course). ... snip JO The to: field must be set *the same* as in the address book (I JO mean the display name), even if I write only the email address JO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or the Last Name (Jones). JO Is it possible? Yes. JO I tried with the followiong macro in the template, but it JO doesn't work as I need: JO %TO='%ABTONAME=%TOADDR' the result is [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom JO Jones. No, it wouldn't. You need something more like this: %TO=%TO=_%ABTONAME='%TONAME'%TOADDR_ First you should clear the current entry - the TO field is cumulative. Then you want to use the real name from the address book or the original real name if there is none. You want to wrap that in quotes in case of any special characters in the name fields. Finally you need to bolt back in the target address. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bayesit and SpamPal
I've been happy using SpamPal and some plug-ins, including the Bayesian filter, with TB! Is there any reason I should consider switching to Bayesit? -- JN Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Open Ltr to Moderators
Thank you, moderators, for having a collectively open mind, taking time from your other activities, and making a concentrated effort to explore the best newsserver-related options, arrange for the mirror, and explain various aspects of it to us users/subscribers. -- JN Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Recipient's address book-Full name in the To: field
Marck, on Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 15:10:15 [GMT +] (which was 16.10 here in Italy) you wrote: MDP You need something more like this: MDP %TO=%TO=_%ABTONAME='%TONAME'%TOADDR_ MDP First you should clear the current entry - the TO field is MDP cumulative. Then you want to use the real name from the address book MDP or the original real name if there is none. You want to wrap that in MDP quotes in case of any special characters in the name fields. Finally MDP you need to bolt back in the target address. Well, I tried. But, if I clear the entry with %TO= , please note that the result I get back is: That's because, I think, the to: field is empty, so the 2nd part of the macro searches an empty record in the AB. If I do not empty the field with %TO= , I get back what I need but as a second entry in the to: field. Cheers -- __ Jacopo [Italy] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html __ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Recipient's address book-Full name in the To: field
Dear Jacopo, @12-Mar-2004, 16:38 +0100 (12-Mar 03:38 PM UK time) Jacopo Ognibene [JO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP %TO=%TO=_%ABTONAME='%TONAME'%TOADDR_ JO Well, I tried. JO But, if I clear the entry with %TO= , please note that the result I JO get back is: JO JO That's because, I think, the to: field is empty, so the 2nd part of JO the macro searches an empty record in the AB. Try using some variables then: %_name=%ABTONAME='%TONAME'%- %_addr=%TOADDR%- %TO=%TO='%_name %_addr'%- -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bayesit and SpamPal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joseph, On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:18:06 + (UTC) (10:18 AM here), Joseph N. [JN] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: JN I've been happy using SpamPal and some plug-ins, including the JN Bayesian filter, with TB! Is there any reason I should consider JN switching to Bayesit? I also use SpamPal with the Bayesian and URLBody plugins. Out of curiosity, I switched to the BayesIT plugin for awhile (2 months). It took about a week or so before it was trained sufficiently to detect spam. After another couple of weeks it was successfully intercepting most of the spam with no false positives. Every so often polling for mail would hang but temporarily disabling BayesIT would resolve the problem, so I think there was a definite correlation. It was convenient not having to run another relay like SpamPal, as everything was almost self contained with The Bat!/BayesIT combo. In spite of this advantage, I still went back to SpamPal. I think SpamPal's additional advantage of using DNSBL public blacklists makes the difference between catching most of the spam vs all of the spam. I've never had any false positives with SpamPal either. For me, SpamPal seems to be a more thorough solution. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFAUdu5vZSrVDqOXK0RAgSGAKDTyQ9jJsv5y6obxPacyTW+oG5OLgCggxlE Q3zBaQkAm9bnxzG7r2oc+TU= =8Ty9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: where can I find tbudl at gmane
Hello Allie, On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:52:12 -0500GMT (12-3-2004, 15:52 +0100, where I live), you wrote: AM Henk De Bruijn, [HDB] wrote: HDB I subscribed to news.gmane.org, dunno why but can´t find tbudl. AM Look for gmane.mail.the-bat.user Thanks! -- regards, Henk. __ The Bat! v2.04.4nl on Windows XP, Pentium III, 550Mhz, 256Mb memory PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID Free Security Certificates http://www.cacert.org Gossammer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Recipient's address book-Full name in the To: field
Marck, on Fri, 12 Mar 2004, at 15:45:57 [GMT +] (which was 16.45 here in Italy) you wrote: MDP Try using some variables then: MDP %_name=%ABTONAME='%TONAME'%- MDP %_addr=%TOADDR%- MDP %TO=%TO='%_name %_addr'%- Great Mark! It's running well. The only bug is with multiple recipients (it keeps the first only), but i'll try something with another macro (the Hi all listed in the FAQ). Thanks again and again for your presence! Jacopo -- __ Jacopo [Italy] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html __ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Gmane can break PGP sigs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL! I noticed my reply to a message that I posted here when echoed to the gmane newsgroup does not verify anymore due to address string alterations. I understand why this is happening, its just something that caught me by surprise. Below are snippets from the beginning of each message showing the alteration. ==on gmane== On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:18:06 + (UTC) (10:18 AM here), Joseph N. [JN] wrote in mid:Xns94AA5EA186FF1jbn10161-A/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ==on TBUDL== On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:18:06 + (UTC) (10:18 AM here), Joseph N. [JN] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFAUeYFvZSrVDqOXK0RAqFMAKDHeowc6eoCPsP/pA6IxCpwTNdDYgCeMpNX 9N0L3QUMu7KvXjt1SVJHMnM= =YMup -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View modes - Help me before I shoot someone!
Hello Costas, Friday, March 12, 2004, 9:48:55 AM, you wrote: Costas View Modes is a torture instrument. I can survive with it for Costas a while, but if I make a mistake and click on a column to sort Costas the folder in a different way, then I have to play with the Costas settings for a long time before I finally get things back in Costas order. Is there a definitive guide on how to manage View Modes Costas or do I really need to be a nuclear physicist to understand Costas how to use this feature (I almost said torture instrument)? You could do what I do. I only have three modes 1. Lists (Like tbudl) 2. Discussions (non lists but threaded) 3. Normal (my inbox) I do on occasion sort a folder a different way, but it's usually because I'm click happy and mistakenly clicked on the header bar. I just click on the header bar to sort back the way it was. -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.05 Beta/1 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP folder antics
Sean H., [SH] wrote: SH Well, I deleted and re-created the account, and everything seems SH to be back to normal. I'll post if the folders go weird again. Ok. Good. Thanks for letting us know. -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:Bayesit and SpamPal
Hi Joseph, I've been happy using SpamPal and some plug-ins, including the Bayesian filter, with TB! Is there any reason I should consider switching to Bayesit? I've just gone the other way! Ditched Bayesit and configured Spampal (plus Bayesian). Very happy with it. No more mail collection hangs and good information about what Spampal's doing. -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane can break PGP sigs
Kevin Coates, [KC] wrote: KC Below are snippets from the beginning of each message showing the KC alteration. That's the address encryption working. -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: unable to save a gif
ON Friday, March 12, 2004, 1:16:47 PM, you wrote: dh Hello TBUDL, dh For some reason I unable to save a gif file attached to email. I dh have tried using save and save at. What could I be missing?? I am dh using 2.04 Hi danger, Does the GIF file show as an attachement? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Things That Sound Dirty At Golf But Aren't: After 18 holes I can barely walk Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: unable to save a gif
Hello Gerard, Friday, March 12, 2004, 2:19:38 PM, you wrote: G ON Friday, March 12, 2004, 1:16:47 PM, you wrote: dh Hello TBUDL, dh For some reason I unable to save a gif file attached to email. I dh have tried using save and save at. What could I be missing?? I am dh using 2.04 G Hi danger, G Does the GIF file show as an attachement? It is both viewable in the message window and allows the save as options. -- Best regards, dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
methods of synchronizing two locations
Hello tbudl, I have to locations I would like to have all my mail at. I use a pop server. Can any one tell me how that manage to do it? Only one site needs to be able to delete the mail on the server if that helps? -- Best regards, danger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question from the Bat Forum...
Dear Anne, @13-Mar-2004, 01:08 Anne [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: A We've been asked if it's possible to print out a message and A include in it the date the message was received by that person's A PC. Yes. ... snip A Any help appreciated. :) It will require a Regex to extract the date from the topmost Received header. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question from the Bat Forum...
Dear Peter, @13-Mar-2004, 02:48 +0100 (13-Mar 01:48 AM UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: PO mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you (like the made up ID? g) MDP It will require a Regex to extract the date from the topmost MDP Received header. PO Why Regex, what's wrong with using something like: PO Received : %ORCVDATE=-mm-dd Nothing - as long as I recall (or knew in the first place) the RCVDATE macro existed g! In fact, it works, whereas my original suggestion was complete pooh (sorry Anne). -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane can break PGP sigs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allie, On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:58:24 -0500 (12:58 PM here), Allie Martin [AM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: KC Below are snippets from the beginning of each message showing the KC alteration. AM That's the address encryption working. I find the mid:; info useful when reading replies, but the gmane encryption breaks the sigs. It will be interesting to see how others handle this. I always liked this feature in The Bat. I suppose that I could use pgp/mime like you have here and then the gmane message wouldn't display the broken pgp signature. BTW, I thought that pgp/mime was only allowed in the TBBeta Yahoo Group. Has this changed? - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.05 Beta/1 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFAUp05vZSrVDqOXK0RAuWpAJ93Ub/MKp2xemeD9F6hx2k1OdgGHwCeNiqj iqll99Fp4dBa4ajnkfkmZJM= =8feu -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
