Re: where are the settings for headers to show stored?

2004-04-03 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Saturday, April 3, 2004, dAniel hAhler wrote:

 I wonder where thebat stores the information of what header fields
 should be displayed in the preview pane, folder view or Edit Mail
 Message window.

in registry

 Just packed my bat installation at home by copying the whole program
 folder and exporting the HKCU\Software\RIT registry key and started in
 on a laptop at home, from the same path and after importing the registry
 data.
 Everything works good, except that I get the default headers only. I
 can, however, rightclick in the header field and select from the list
 the things I had displayed there at home and TB will remember them. But
 why did I lose those settings when transferring the installation?
 The definitions I made (custom headers like POPFile-Link) are
 available in the RMB menu, but the information that they were set to be
 displayed got lost.

I have discovered this problem week ago and I have added it Bugtraq
already:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002749

Stef knows about it, but new Filtering system has the highest priority
now :-)

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 2.05 Beta/12
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: WTB Kaspersky ani-Virus package

2004-04-03 Thread Robert Golovniov
On Saturday, April 3, 2004, 2:36:16 AM, Mark Partous wrote:

MP You're sure you wrote this on April, 2nd, and not on April, 1st?  :-)

:-) There have been an even more interesting stuff on the Russian part
of  the  Internet:  Microsoft  has  announced that they have purchased
Kaspersky Labs, so there is no need to worry about Eugene. :-)

-- 
 -=Robert  Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
~~
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Embedded%20key
~~



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Tools-Search hangs

2004-04-03 Thread Lawrence Johnson
Running 2.04.4 under Windows 98SE

When I invoke Tools-Search thats the last I hear from The Bat!

It goes to a busy mouse icon and I eventually have to kill the application.

I hope someone has some idea what the problem is.

 Lawrence Johnson  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Send of Bug report rejected by RitLabs

2004-04-03 Thread Lawrence Johnson
I got this sending a bug report to RitLabs

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host mail.ritlabs.com[212.56.194.247] said: 551
Recipient discarded (in reply to RCPT TO command)

What does this mean?  

-- 
Best regards,
 Lawrence Johnson  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Tools-Search hangs

2004-04-03 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Saturday, April 3, 2004, Lawrence Johnson wrote:

 Running 2.04.4 under Windows 98SE

 When I invoke Tools-Search thats the last I hear from The Bat!

 It goes to a busy mouse icon and I eventually have to kill the application.

 I hope someone has some idea what the problem is.

yes, upgrade Your version to 2.04.7 available on www.ritlabs.com, this
problem was fixed in this release.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 2.05 Beta/12
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Send of Bug report rejected by RitLabs

2004-04-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Lawrence,

@3-Apr-2004, 12:53 -0600 (03-Apr 19:53 UK time) Lawrence Johnson
[LJ] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

LJ I got this sending a bug report to RitLabs

LJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host
LJ mail.ritlabs.com[212.56.194.247] said: 551
LJ Recipient discarded (in reply to RCPT TO command)

LJ What does this mean?

Mostly that bugs are not really handled that way these days - it's
an obsolete address.

These days bug tracking is done through the BugTraq system and
mostly centres around the latest Betas.

If you are interested in participating in beta tests, here are the
details:

There is a Beta web site located at http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/

To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
  http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

You can subscribe to the discussion list here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Beta versions are regularly announced there. Review the archive for
details (and download locations) of the current beta version on
http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com.

-- 
Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.05 Beta/12 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: where are the settings for headers to show stored?

2004-04-03 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats,

on Sat, 3. Apr 2004 at 11:21:04 +0200 Marek Mikus wrote:

 The definitions I made (custom headers like POPFile-Link) are
 available in the RMB menu, but the information that they were set to be
 displayed got lost.

 I have discovered this problem week ago and I have added it Bugtraq
 already:
 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002749

Thanks.

 Stef knows about it, but new Filtering system has the highest priority
 now :-)

Of course.. :)
but this should be easy to fix, too.


-- 
shinE!
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc
lifted with The Bat! 2.05 Beta/12 on Windows XP Service Pack 1.



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Send of Bug report rejected by RitLabs

2004-04-03 Thread Marco Lackovic
Hi everybody!


The 3.4.2004 at 21.07 Marck wrote:
LJ I got this sending a bug report to RitLabs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LJ host mail.ritlabs.com[212.56.194.247] said: 551 Recipient
LJ discarded (in reply to RCPT TO command)
MDP Mostly that bugs are not really handled that way these days -
MDP it's an obsolete address. These days bug tracking is done through
MDP the BugTraq system and mostly centres around the latest Betas.

Shouldn't this be clearly stated inside TB too? At present time both
the menu fields Feedback | Bug Report and Information Request
refer to inexistent addresses. Even the Welcome message inserted by
default in the Inbox folder contains fake addresses; well, what kind
of welcome message is that?! I personally found it annoying and not
much professional. Potential customers could be irritated by that and
decide to not use TB.


-- 
Regards,
  Marco Lackovic

  Using The Bat! v2.04.7
  on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1





Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html