User data of TB 3 under Windows XP

2005-01-12 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ!

A friend who also uses TB 3.x has a small problem under WinXP.

He said, he has found a TB-folder on his C-partition in the "Documents
and Settings"-fodler(c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\... in German),
which takes about 250 MB. It seems to hold the same mails as his
mail-folder, which he installed (with TB) on another partition.

Can he safely delete the data on C?

I cannot verify his "problem" on Windows 2000.

Any ideas?

-- 
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | 
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional & K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)











Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Can't repair Inbox

2005-01-12 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello Alexander,

Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 12:54:17 PM, you wrote:

ASK> It happened to me once that deleting the .tbi file alone did not help, the
ASK> messagebase itself was corrupted and had a "hole" - one entry in the
ASK> message list was without any subject or other information.

ASK> I fixed it by manually re-building the messagebase:

This worked. There was a nasty message in each of 2 accounts.
Manually rebuilding as you described earlier fixed them.

Thanks for the idea.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A  
pgp key: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello Robin,

Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:56:15 PM, you wrote:

RA> On Thu 13 January 2005, 6:10:37 +1000, Scott Frederick wrote:
>> Any new message or reply spawns a blank page with no headers
>> (basically it seem that no template is being invoked).

RA> Permit me to ask the obvious - you do have templates defined for new
RA> messages and replies for all of your accounts do you?

I do.

It seems to be working now. I just checked a couple of accounts.

I uninstalled but left the registry files, then reinstalled to a
new location. The template problems persisted but I just deleted
a couple of dummy accounts the I had set up earlier while trying to
solve my damaged mail database problem.

These dummy accounts had the same settings as an existing
account. Deleting them seems to have fixed the template problem.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A  
pgp key: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu 13 January 2005, 6:10:37 +1000, Scott Frederick wrote:
> Any new message or reply spawns a blank page with no headers
> (basically it seem that no template is being invoked).

Permit me to ask the obvious - you do have templates defined for new
messages and replies for all of your accounts do you?


-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello Peter,

Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:28:03 AM, you wrote:

PH> No. You don't have to uninstall it.

PH> Simply make a backup of all your data and do it!

PH> After running the batch simply call thebat.exe, insert all data and restore 
your
PH> backup.

PH> That's it.

Very frustrating. I have to be doing something wrong because I dont
get any option which allows me to choose OTFE at all.
I reun the regedit, make sure all the rit entries are gone. Follow
through with TB set up. I get to the screen where I can import my
backed up email db, and then its done. No option to choose OTFE.
Any ideas?
Thanks

-- 
Best regards,
 Darrin 

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
 


pgpdNlSlDn4GT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Need simple RegEx on X- header

2005-01-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:34:28 +0100 GMT (13/01/2005, 01:34 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:

PM> I'm not good at regex either, but I'd say your first task should be
PM> solved without.

As Roelof also pointed out. Thanks.

TF>> The filters need to do this:

TF>> IF X-Received-By = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF>>   DO action
TF>> CONTINUE WITH OTHER FILTERS.

PM> You can select this header field for filtering after adding it to your
PM> own custom header fields. I don't think you need a regex here.

Again, I don't see why I need to declare a customs header field for
reading, but since I will have to declare it for the reply templates
anyway, that will be no problem. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Cadix liegt auf einer Insel, und vermittels einer Brucke hangt das
feste Land mit dem Meere zusammen.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Need simple RegEx on X- header

2005-01-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:57:10 +0100 GMT (13/01/2005, 03:57 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:

TF>> I'm not good at regex. In fact, I don't understand them, but I have
TF>> copied a few from the library and they work fine. What I now need is a
TF>> rather simple one.

RO> Actually you don't need a regex at all.

Thanks for pointing this out.

TF>> X-Received-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RO> Define an additional header for TB at
RO>  Options -> Preferences -> Message Headers

I need to define the header? But the header already comes with the
message, I don't want to create it just recognise it.

TF>> The filters need to do this:

TF>> IF X-Received-By = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF>>   DO action
TF>> CONTINUE WITH OTHER FILTERS.

RO> Filter condition would be:
RO>  Message header - X-Received-By - contains - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Didn't think about the most simple solution. I think this should do it
perfectly.

TF>> Task 2: The reply template in the main account (where all messages
TF>> reside) should use the address indicated by the X-Received-By header
TF>> as the From address. No need for an %Account= macro, the %From= will

TF>> %FROM="the email address in the X-Received-By header"

RO> %From='%OHeader="X-Received-By"'%-

I might understand this: This is why I need to declare the header
above (and I need to do this once for all TB accounts and for all
eternity, is that correct?), and I didn't know the %OHeader macro
would extract exactly what I need. Wow.

RO> When you're insisting on some regexp, that can be arranged too, but
RO> why should you?

No, no, I feel much for comfortable without. :-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman around to hear
him, is he still wrong?

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: BayestIt! problem

2005-01-12 Thread Steve & Mary King
 Buiculescu, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 11:34:32 AM, you wrote:==

> Hello list,

> BayesIt 0.7.3 gives all messages a rating of 99. No matter what.
> I kept using those Mark as Junk and Mark as NOT Junk buttons but
> nothing.

> I'm using TB! 3.0.1.33

Try  Bayes Filter Plugin from http://www.lkcc.org:8500/index.php.  Once
trained, it's much more accurate than RITLab's own plug-in.  Be sure to get
2.01 because I found it much better than 2.00, even though the author said the
changes were minor.

Steve . . .

-- 

Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 and Bayes Filter Plugin 2.01 under Windows 98SE



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: BayestIt! problem

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Dillinger
Message from "Mike Dillinger" on 01/12/05 02:50 PM PT quoted:
Message from "Buiculescu Virgil" on 01/12/05 11:34 AM PT quoted:
Hello list,
BayesIt 0.7.3 gives all messages a rating of 99. No matter what.
I kept using those Mark as Junk and Mark as NOT Junk buttons but
nothing.
I'm using TB! 3.0.1.33

Download the latest version of Bayes Filter here:
http://www.lkcc.org:8500/download.php
It looks like you have a really old version and that's most likely the 
problem.
Whoops.  Sorry about that.  Wrong Bayes filter.
--
-MikeD

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: BayestIt! problem

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Dillinger
Message from "Buiculescu Virgil" on 01/12/05 11:34 AM PT quoted:
Hello list,
BayesIt 0.7.3 gives all messages a rating of 99. No matter what.
I kept using those Mark as Junk and Mark as NOT Junk buttons but
nothing.
I'm using TB! 3.0.1.33
Download the latest version of Bayes Filter here:
http://www.lkcc.org:8500/download.php
It looks like you have a really old version and that's most likely the 
problem.

--
-MikeD

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Scott,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:50:15 -0800GMT (12-1-2005, 22:50 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

>> Does it help when you switch between MicroEd and the Windows editor?
SF> No. I just tried all the options and it makes no difference.

Well, it was just a wild guess.

SF> I just reinstalled and the problem is the same.

You reinstalled. Did you uninstall too? If not try that, as you
mentioned that it happened to all of your accounts, it's not likely to
be an account setting.
Uninstall without throwing away your message base. When you reinstall
just enter the names of your old accounts when creating new ones,
that'll cause TB to pick the original ones from disk.

What did you change last, before the problem occurred? (TB, user
rights in XP, virus scanner, whatever)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Windows practical joke: Write a program that works.

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpmlhOYqVUzO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello Roelof.

You said:

> What editor do you use?

MicroEd

> Does it help when you switch between MicroEd and the Windows editor?

No. I just tried all the options and it makes no difference.

I just reinstalled and the problem is the same.

Scott
-- 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: Top posting (was: need filer help please)

2005-01-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Buiculescu,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:26:33 +0200GMT (12-1-2005, 20:26 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

BV> If it is just a spammer (as in one e-mail address sending the spam
BV>  just ctrl+shift+f , detect by sender, and move them to thrash ;p


BV> Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:21:47 PM, you wrote:

>> Battyfolk,


Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Buiculescu.

  )<)))'>

This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.

Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because

a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
   top of the message

and

b) It encourages excessive quoting.

We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
part separately and follow each part with your response.

Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active
members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being
asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership
here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group
when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and
understand.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The shortest distance between two Points is a BossNode.

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpN0BYk5GsYw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

BayestIt! problem

2005-01-12 Thread Buiculescu Virgil
Hello list,

BayesIt 0.7.3 gives all messages a rating of 99. No matter what.
I kept using those Mark as Junk and Mark as NOT Junk buttons but
nothing.

I'm using TB! 3.0.1.33

  

-- 
Best regards,
  Buiculescu Virgil  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: need filer help please

2005-01-12 Thread Buiculescu Virgil
If it is just a spammer (as in one e-mail address sending the spam
 just ctrl+shift+f , detect by sender, and move them to thrash ;p


Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:21:47 PM, you wrote:

> Battyfolk,

> I have a spammer that sends out msgs w/o text but only one "gif"
> image. How do I set up a filter for this specific problem? TIA




-- 
Best regards,
 Buiculescu Virgil   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Need simple RegEx on X- header

2005-01-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas,

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:53:38 +0700GMT (12-1-2005, 18:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

TF> I'm not good at regex. In fact, I don't understand them, but I have
TF> copied a few from the library and they work fine. What I now need is a
TF> rather simple one.

Actually you don't need a regex at all.

TF> X-Received-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Define an additional header for TB at
 Options -> Preferences -> Message Headers

TF> The filters need to do this:

TF> IF X-Received-By = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF>   DO action
TF> CONTINUE WITH OTHER FILTERS.

Filter condition would be:
 Message header - X-Received-By - contains - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TF> Task 2: The reply template in the main account (where all messages
TF> reside) should use the address indicated by the X-Received-By header
TF> as the From address. No need for an %Account= macro, the %From= will

TF> %FROM="the email address in the X-Received-By header"

%From='%OHeader="X-Received-By"'%-

When you're insisting on some regexp, that can be arranged too, but
why should you?

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Error 99: Dead mouse in hard drive.

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpCh99FfbA69.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Scott,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:10:37 -0800GMT (12-1-2005, 20:10 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

SF> Any new message or reply spawns a blank page with no headers
SF> (basically it seem that no template is being invoked).

What editor do you use?
Does it help when you switch between MicroEd and the Windows editor?

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

"Windows 95: Making Windows work just like a Mac did10 years ago!" 

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpgJGQy9PsMQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply spawns blank page

2005-01-12 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello TBUDL,

Now my editor has the shakes.

Any new message or reply spawns a blank page with no headers
(basically it seem that no template is being invoked).

This happens across all accounts/folders.

Scott



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Need simple RegEx on X- header

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas,

on Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:53:38 +0700GMT, you wrote:

TF> I'm not good at regex. In fact, I don't understand them, but I have
TF> copied a few from the library and they work fine. What I now need is a
TF> rather simple one.

I'm not good at regex either, but I'd say your first task should be
solved without.

TF> The filters need to do this:

TF> IF X-Received-By = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF>   DO action
TF> CONTINUE WITH OTHER FILTERS.

You can select this header field for filtering after adding it to your
own custom header fields. I don't think you need a regex here.

I'm afraid your second task does require regex, so, sorry... (see
above ;-) )

-- 
Cheers
Peter

A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Need simple RegEx on X- header

2005-01-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello tbudl,

I'm not good at regex. In fact, I don't understand them, but I have
copied a few from the library and they work fine. What I now need is a
rather simple one.

I check several accounts and move the messages to folders in the main
account. However, I want to colour-code them based on an X-Received-By
header, which the sysad promised he will set up in Merak tomorrow.

So the incoming mails will have a header:

X-Received-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Task 1: Common incoming filters should recognise this header and
trigger an Action (colour-coding) based on this, so I can easily see
which account the mail originally arrived in. Actually, I would prefer
to set a memo (so it shows in the message list, IMHO better than a
colour code), but I cannot find this as a filter action.

The filters need to do this:

IF X-Received-By = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  DO action
CONTINUE WITH OTHER FILTERS.

I believe this must be something like Header - match - RegEx. this is
the first regex I'm looking for.

(Other common filters processed afterwards will move the messages, that
is no problem, I have already tested this.)

Task 2: The reply template in the main account (where all messages
reside) should use the address indicated by the X-Received-By header
as the From address. No need for an %Account= macro, the %From= will
do, as the server will accept any From address from our domain as long
as I am connected to the server from within the LAN.

%FROM="the email address in the X-Received-By header"

This is the second regex I'm looking for.

-- 
TIA,

Thomas.



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: need filer help please

2005-01-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005 it appears that Ciprian Trofin
wrote the following in regards to "need filer help please":

JR>> I have a spammer that sends out msgs w/o text but only one "gif"
JR>> image. How do I set up a filter for this specific problem? TIA
CT> Try some anti-spam software. TB's plugin Bayes Filter (made by Achim
CT> Winkler) takes care of this problem quite OK. However, YMMV.

Hello Ciprian. As you can see from my sig, I use bayesit plug-in.
How does the Winkler plug-in take care of this problem & where is
this plug-in available? TIA

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.0.2.10, BayesIt! 0.7.9 (New Year), Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329









Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Sub Filters - How to use

2005-01-12 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gerard & everyone else,

on 12-Jan-2005 at 11:05 you (Gerard) wrote:

ASK>> I have a setup of *account* filters (for all mailinglists) with one parent
ASK>> filter (and it has NO "action" defined!), then subfilters for each
ASK>> individual list, and it works just fine.

> Strange, I will check it again. Maybe an oversight on my part :(

I thought you were using a *common* filter, so this may actually be related
to the bug reported by MAU.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

There is nothing new except what has been forgotten. -- Attributed to
Marie Antionette's milliner



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Hampf
Good evening Darrin,

additional hint: before removing the registry tree "the bat!" make a backup 
copy by
exporting this tree! (Just for all cases...)

You can do this with this command:

  reg export "HKCU\Software\Rit\The Bat!" \path\original-bat.reg


-- 
Regards,
 Peter

  Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Hampf
Good evening Darrin,

on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:41:13 -0800 GMT your local time you wrote:

DR> Thanks. Ill give it a try. I do this after I uninstall tb and before I
DR> reinstall it? Is that correct?

No. You don't have to uninstall it.

Simply make a backup of all your data and do it!

After running the batch simply call thebat.exe, insert all data and restore your
backup.

That's it.

-- 
Regards,
 Peter

  Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Submission forms

2005-01-12 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Wednesday, January 12, 2005, Leif Gregory wrote:

M>> I am using it for registering The Bat! licences and in past, I had
M>> some forms for secure communication with a friends. Actualy, I am
M>> using SF for registrations only.

> Would you be willing to share some code on that?

no problem, but I must find them, I am not using this type of
communication for some years.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line

 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ralph!

On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:49 AM, you wrote:

> Thanx for your help, but i already found the problem: it seems automatic spell
> checking, doesn't work with the windows editor - only with microed...

Ah. Well spotted, that, on your part! I never use anything but Microed
and so that possibility didn't enter my head.

I love Microed. I wish I could somehow make Microsoft's Word work with
Microed as its Editor!

But, to each his own!! :)

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ralph
Hello Mary Bull,

@Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 16:34 you wrote:

> Hello Ralph!

> On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:16 AM, you wrote:

>>> Why don't you try the Shortcut (Control plus F4) and see if it kicks
>>> in?

>>> Your Bat is definitely missing something on the Spell Checker menu!

>> I can't complain about manual spell checking (F4 works fine), but
>> as you say, there's something missing...

> My menu has the choices:

> Automatic Checking CTRL+F4
> Check Entire Text F4
> Check Before Send/Queue
> Language
> Options
> Dictionary

> In The Bat! folder, do you have the files tb.lng and lngversion.exe?

> People not using the Pro version of 3.xx had to download the
> International Pack separately, to have all the spelling dictionary
> functions. I wonder whether your shortened SpellChecker menu is
> related to a lack of that

Thanx for your help, but i already found the problem: it seems automatic spell
checking, doesn't work with the windows editor - only with microed...

-- 
Regards,
Ralph

The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2


pgpI67fy71pIX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ralph
Hello Mary Bull,

@Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 16:34 you wrote:

> My menu has the choices:

> Automatic Checking CTRL+F4

That's exactly the item i miss...

> Check Entire Text F4
> Check Before Send/Queue
> Language
> Options
> Dictionary

> In The Bat! folder, do you have the files tb.lng and lngversion.exe?

> People not using the Pro version of 3.xx had to download the
> International Pack separately, to have all the spelling dictionary
> functions. I wonder whether your shortened SpellChecker menu is
> related to a lack of that?

I installed the International Pack and have the file lngversion.exe, but no 
tb.lng...

-- 
Regards,
Ralph

The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2


pgpSgPyl26Fj3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello Peter,

Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 7:33:09 AM, you wrote:

PH> If you are running WinXP, execute this from the command line:

PH>  reg delete "HKCU\Software\Rit\The Bat!" /f

PH> (copy and paste it exactly as shown!)

Thanks. Ill give it a try. I do this after I uninstall tb and before I
reinstall it? Is that correct?

-- 
Best regards,
 Darrin 

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
 


pgpqfmikCri4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ralph!

On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:16 AM, you wrote:

>> Why don't you try the Shortcut (Control plus F4) and see if it kicks
>> in?

>> Your Bat is definitely missing something on the Spell Checker menu!

> I can't complain about manual spell checking (F4 works fine), but
> as you say, there's something missing...

My menu has the choices:

Automatic Checking CTRL+F4
Check Entire Text F4
Check Before Send/Queue
Language
Options
Dictionary

In The Bat! folder, do you have the files tb.lng and lngversion.exe?

People not using the Pro version of 3.xx had to download the
International Pack separately, to have all the spelling dictionary
functions. I wonder whether your shortened SpellChecker menu is
related to a lack of that?

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Darrin,

on Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:16:41 -0800 GMT your local time you wrote:

DR> I think Im not cleaning the registry enough here, because my license
DR> is still activated with it. Any tips on this?

If you are running WinXP, execute this from the command line:

 reg delete "HKCU\Software\Rit\The Bat!" /f

(copy and paste it exactly as shown!)

Or write it to a plain ascii file called "delbat.bat" and double-click it.

Alternatively run regedit.exe, navigate to the key 
"HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Rit"
and remove the COMPLETE tree "The Bat!". (Caution! Do not remove anything else!)

Then start thebat.exe. The first (or one of the first) questions will be 
whether you
want to use OTFE.

HTH.

-- 
Regards,
 Peter

  Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Submission forms

2005-01-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Marek,

Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 7:25:41 AM, you wrote:
M> I am using it for registering The Bat! licences and in past, I had
M> some forms for secure communication with a friends. Actualy, I am
M> using SF for registrations only.

Would you be willing to share some code on that?


-- 
 __       TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php

Tagline of the day:
COMMAND: A suggestion made to a computer.





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ralph
 Mary Bull,

@Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 16:09 you wrote:

> Hello Ralph!

> On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:00 AM, you wrote:

>> Sorry, but i can't find anything like "Automatic Checking". I
>> posted a screenshot with the available menu entries here:
>> http://www.inselsbacher.at/pics/spellchecking.png

> I see your difficulty, on the screenshot. My menu has "Automatic
> Checking" as its first choice, with a Shortcut option, Control plus
> F4.

> Why don't you try the Shortcut (Control plus F4) and see if it kicks
> in?

> Your Bat is definitely missing something on the Spell Checker menu!


I can't complain about manual spell checking (F4 works fine), but as you say, 
there's something missing...

-- 
Regards,
Ralph

The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2


pgpxEgROl3caj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello Peter,

Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 5:31:47 AM, you wrote:

PH> - make a full backup
PH> - quit TB
PH> - remove the registry tree HKCU/Software/Rit/TheBat!
PH> - start TB, choose OTFE from the dialog, insert all
PH> neccessary data but do not create an account
PH> - restore the data (from your previously created backup) during install 
dialog.

I must be doing something wrong because It doesnt want to work with
me. I do have Pro version. I made a backup, removed the registry,
started ( at least I think I did, there was only one entry after I
uninstalled tb).
Went through the reinstall, but didnt see anything about OTFE. Am I
missing something.
I think Im not cleaning the registry enough here, because my license
is still activated with it. Any tips on this?

-- 
Best regards,
 Darrin 

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
 


pgphYoZZwzZEI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ralph!

On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:00 AM, you wrote:

> Sorry, but i can't find anything like "Automatic Checking". I
> posted a screenshot with the available menu entries here:
> http://www.inselsbacher.at/pics/spellchecking.png

I see your difficulty, on the screenshot. My menu has "Automatic
Checking" as its first choice, with a Shortcut option, Control plus
F4.

Why don't you try the Shortcut (Control plus F4) and see if it kicks
in?

Your Bat is definitely missing something on the Spell Checker menu!

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ralph
 Ian A. White,

@Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 11:59 you wrote:

> Ralph,

> On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 9:43:34 PM, you (Ralph) wrote:

R>> Hello,

R>> how can i set the spell checker, to check spelling while
R>> writing a mail? I can't find such an option...

> Start writing a message. Then from the Spell Checker menu pick
> Automatic Checking.


Sorry, but i can't find anything like "Automatic Checking". I posted a 
screenshot with the available menu entries here: 
http://www.inselsbacher.at/pics/spellchecking.png

-- 
Regards,
Ralph

The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2


pgpwSjvv5mrjk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: need filer help please

2005-01-12 Thread Ciprian Trofin
JR> I have a spammer that sends out msgs w/o text but only one "gif"
JR> image. How do I set up a filter for this specific problem? TIA
Try some anti-spam software. TB's plugin Bayes Filter (made by Achim
Winkler) takes care of this problem quite OK. However, YMMV.

-- 
 Ciprian




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


need filer help please

2005-01-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Battyfolk,

I have a spammer that sends out msgs w/o text but only one "gif"
image. How do I set up a filter for this specific problem? TIA

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.0.2.10, BayesIt! 0.7.9 (New Year), Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329








Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with lst file)

2005-01-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ron,

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:58:23 -0600GMT (12-1-2005, 2:58 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

RC> Best regards,
RC> Ronmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RC> "Poor man... he was like an employee to me." -- The police commisioner on 
"Sledge Hammer"
RC> laments the death of his bodyguard

RC> --
RC> Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 12:59:51 AM, you wrote:


Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Ron.

  )<)))'>

This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.

Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because

a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
   top of the message

and

b) It encourages excessive quoting.

We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
part separately and follow each part with your response.

Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active
members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being
asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership
here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group
when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and
understand.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

FIDO: the Information Frontage Road.

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgphYYw0rpUDU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread David Elliott
Hi TBUDL,

It was foretold that on 12 January 2005, at 11:45:25 +0100 (which was 10:43
where I live) Ralph wrote and made these points

> how can i set the spell checker, to check spelling while writing a
> mail? I can't find such an option...

Start to write am email from the menu 'Spell checker' check the option
'Automatic Checking'

HTH

-- 
 Regards,  ___
  David   |David  Elliott|   Software  Engineer   |
 _| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534  |
| Who is General Failure and why is he reading my drive?  |


pgptgLyg0aRQr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Gerard,

Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 11:05:04 AM, you wrote:

G> Since you have it installed, can you see if it already works with a hardware
G> token to and if so which kind.

It works with Rainbow iKey 1000 and Aladin eToken - both active and
working VERY VERY stable here for a few years, first with SecureBat and
now with its successor TheBat Pro 3.x.

-- 
Best regards,
 Petermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Spell checking while writing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ralph
Hello,

how can i set the spell checker, to check spelling while writing a mail? I 
can't find such an option...

-- 
Regards,
Ralph

The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2


pgpKgLLeR55Gz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Sub Filters - How to use

2005-01-12 Thread Gerard

ON Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 9:59:02 PM, you wrote:
ASK> I have a setup of *account* filters (for all mailinglists) with one parent
ASK> filter (and it has NO "action" defined!), then subfilters for each
ASK> individual list, and it works just fine.

Alexander,

Strange, I will check it again. Maybe an oversight on my part :(

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The loss of focus on four or five shots a round makes the difference between
great golf and mediocre golf.

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: on the fly encryption

2005-01-12 Thread Gerard

ON Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 7:40:07 PM, you wrote:
G>> How often do you need to enter the PW?

PH> Once at startup.

Peter,

Since you have it installed, can you see if it already works with a hardware
token to and if so which kind.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air. -Jack Benny

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strike Two for TheBat!

2005-01-12 Thread Lawrence Johnson
I just had the second instance in which TB! mangled folders because
my system locked up or crashed during folder compression.  It doesn't
happen often but when it does, its a disaster.  And so long as we use
the operating system garbage being churned out by the clowns in
Redmond, Windows can crash without the least warning.  Knowing this,
RITLABS should take great pains to checkpoint and protect the mail
database during update and ESPECIALY during folder compression.

I've isolated the folders having errors, just as I did the first time
this occurred.  I can scan the TBB file and see the remnants of my
mail, but it apparently no longer makes sense to TB!.  I'll try to
manually piece together some of the more important mail messages.
Since TB! is unable to recover all my messages, are there any
non-RITLABS utilities which do a better job of recovery or am I on my
own here?

-- 
Best regards,
 Lawrence Johnson  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html