Recently, Alexander S. Kunz squawked:
> ...that was happening to Marck in his QT's, but you can always use the more
> general approach of the %SETHEADER macro.
OK. Tnx. I will have to cogitate on how to make it an automatic
reply/forward to handle spam
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
___
Hello Barry,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 12:16:23 PM, you wrote:
B> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:33:56 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
B>
>> Well I have never dug into it quite that deeply, but it sounds like
>> those files are only used for calculating stats, not for the actual
>> filtering, so their not b
Hello Robert D. & everyone else,
on 11-Jan-2006 at 20:13 you (Robert D.) wrote:
> "To:" somethin'-or-other not workin'...
...that was happening to Marck in his QT's, but you can always use the more
general approach of the %SETHEADER macro.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de -
Recently, MFPA squawked:
> How about using a reply template and including a QT to change the
> "To" and whatever other headers you need to edit?
Yes, I was also thinking of that this morning. But my train of though
was interrupted by a vague recollection of a TBBETA discussion about
"To:" somethi
Recently, MAU squawked:
> Just 'viruses'. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_of_virus
"Their occurrence can be variously attributed to hypercorrection
formed by analogy".
referring to the way I said viii .
hypercorrection .. that would be Mary of TBOT doing grammar
checks on my w
Hi
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 at 4:23:30 PM, in
, Robert D. wrote:
> Now I am unable to do that.
> Maybe I'll go cry about it and have a beer on TBOT .
How about using a reply template and including a QT to change the
"To" and whatever other headers you need to edit?
--
Best regards,
MF
Hello MFPA & everyone else,
on 11-Jan-2006 at 19:05 you (MFPA) wrote:
> In that case, why not just copy from the body and paste into the
> subject field?
but of course!
rotfl!!!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
The great pleasure of a dog is that you may
Hi
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 at 5:38:23 PM, in
, Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
> You want to type a word in the text body and have it appear in the
> subject, did I understand that correctly?
> That ain't working. You must at least copy the word to the clipboard, then
> you can use some QT/regex
Hello Robert,
> virus' [virii ??]
Just 'viruses'. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_of_virus
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.65
Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] & everyone else,
on 11-Jan-2006 at 12:30 you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i wonder if there is a macro that will fill up automatically the header
> subject when inserting text in the editing body under 'subject'.
> for example, this text body consist of a 'subject'. so wh
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:43 -0600, Chris wrote:
> This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file
> correct?
As far as I can tell.
FileMon shows that Bayesit is accessing the file to read it but just
doesn't seem to write anything. But I don't know whether this file
stat.bin i
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:33:56 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
> Well I have never dug into it quite that deeply, but it sounds like
> those files are only used for calculating stats, not for the actual
> filtering, so their not being around should not cause a filter issue.
Mike, I think we may be at cro
Barry @ 1/11/2006 5:43:22 AM
"No Bayesit Stats"
> Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file
correct?
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edit
Hello Barry,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 10:09:55 AM, you wrote:
B> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:02:25 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
>> But I wasn't particularly 'religious' about checking the stats. I was
>> more interested in the results
B> Well, for sure, but I've been running 'FileMon' and it seems t
Recently, Roelof Otten squawked:
> Hallo Robert,
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:41:25 -0500GMT (11-1-2006, 15:41 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:
RD>> In all cases, the attachments seem to be bound to the Forwarded email
RD>> no matter what I do.
> To tell you the truth, I've never been aware of th
Hello Roelof!
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 9:28 AM, you wrote:
MB>> 1) "Forward" used to drop the attachment.
> Not here.
MB>> 2) "ReDirect" sent the mail on with the attachment bound.
> That's true. The difference between redirect and forward was that a
> forward used a template and changed
Hallo Mary,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:10:13 -0600GMT (11-1-2006, 16:10 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> 1) "Forward" used to drop the attachment.
Not here.
MB> 2) "ReDirect" sent the mail on with the attachment bound.
That's true. The difference between redirect and forward was that a
forward
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:02:25 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
> But I wasn't particularly 'religious' about checking the stats. I was
> more interested in the results
Well, for sure, but I've been running 'FileMon' and it seems to me that
BayesIt isn't working quite right. It seems as if it tries to open
Hello Robert!
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 8:41 AM, you wrote:
>> Have you tried going to ACCOUNT/PROPERTIES/TEMPLATES/FORWARD and
>> making sure the "forward messages as attachments" is unchecked?
> Indeed. WITH it checked, and viewing the outbox message, I see 1.eml
> Tab. Looking at that t
Hallo Robert,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:41:25 -0500GMT (11-1-2006, 15:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RD> In all cases, the attachments seem to be bound to the Forwarded email
RD> no matter what I do.
To tell you the truth, I've never been aware of the possibility to
automatically skip attachme
Recently, Darrin squawked:
> Have you tried going to ACCOUNT/PROPERTIES/TEMPLATES/FORWARD and
> making sure the "forward messages as attachments" is unchecked?
Indeed. WITH it checked, and viewing the outbox message, I see 1.eml
Tab. Looking at that tab, I see four jpeg attachments, in the test
c
Hallo Vernon,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:30:02 -0500GMT (11-1-2006, 12:30 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
M> i wonder if there is a macro that will fill up automatically the header
M> subject when inserting text in the editing body under 'subject'.
No, that isn't possible.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Wi
Hello Sean,
Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 10:20:03 PM, you wrote:
> Hello tbudl,
> Anyone know where I can get a eTokens smart card in the UK. The
> irish one has gone awol :( None seem to give prices etc
> Sean
Just contacted a dealer in England :)
Sean
--
+
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:05:48 AM, you wrote:
RD> I used to be able to forward things, like spam, and NOT send the
RD> attachments. Now no matter what I try, the attachments go along with
RD> the forwarded email.
Have you tried going to ACCOUNT/PROPERTIES/TEMPLATES/FORWARD an
I used to be able to forward things, like spam, and NOT send the
attachments. Now no matter what I try, the attachments go along with
the forwarded email.
Does anyone have a QT that will correct my problem with the 'Forward'?
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat
Hello Barry,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:43:22 AM, you wrote:
B> Hi
B> I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats.
B> Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
I can't look at the moment 'cuz I am currently testing out AGAVA. But
I seem to recall seeing s
dear list,
subject: insert a text 'subject' in header subject
--
i wonder if there is a macro that will fill up automatically the header
subject when inserting text in the editing body under 'subject'.
for example, this text body consist of a 'subje
Hi
I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats.
Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.64.01 (Christmas Edition)
and BayesIt! 0.8.4 Release
__
28 matches
Mail list logo
