MFPA @ 2006-6-05 8:17:07 PM
"Attachments open with a different name"
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Do you think that you could turn on PGP MIME for this list?
>> When The Bat! is extracting/decoding the file, it stores it in the
>> temporary folder. Lest The Bat! overwrite some other ap
Leif Gregory @ 2006-6-05 5:04:03 PM
"Order.txt file in \Program Files\The Bat!\Images"
> Now this is where it gets fuzzy. I don't recall us ever coming up
> with a workaround outside of order.txt. So long as you don't have
> conflicting handles, order.txt is irrelevant.
Well, if you need one no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Monday 5 June 2006 at 11:10:47 PM, in
, Mary Bull wrote:
> I guess if MFPA later turns out to feel a need for this file, he now
> has a way to set it up again. Since he deleted it, on advice from me
> and from Alexander. :)
I actually left it there but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Monday 5 June 2006 at 9:05:33 PM, in
, Chris wrote:
> When The Bat! is extracting/decoding the file, it stores it in the
> temporary folder. Lest The Bat! overwrite some other application's
> temporary file, it uses a random, unique filename.
Why use t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi
On Monday 5 June 2006 at 9:02:48 PM, in
, Chris wrote:
> I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft.
> They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people.
Based on ...?
- --
Best regards,
MFPA
During an erup
Hello Chris,
Monday, June 5, 2006, 10:02:48 PM, you wrote:
C> No. I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft.
C> They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people.
Absolutely. They earned their degree by learning to pretend they know. :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Hello Leif!
On Monday, June 05, 2006, 4:04 PM, you wrote:
>> Understandable. Most of the discussion on TBOT of the files and
>> folders in Images came as a result of the testing going on there of
>> the pcwsmiley code Leif was writing. In the process, at some point
>> he told us we could delete O
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:06:24 -0500, "Ken" said:
> > Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption?
>
>
> I've noticed this when running TB in conjunction with Opera 9 Beta.
> If I shut down Opera TB behaves itself. I use straight POP3, no IMAP.
I'm not running Opera, but have to assum
>> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I
>> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual
>> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently
>> using 512MB of VM!
>> Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption?
Hello Mary,
Sunday, June 4, 2006, 1:24:02 PM, you wrote:
> Understandable. Most of the discussion on TBOT of the files and
> folders in Images came as a result of the testing going on there of
> the pcwsmiley code Leif was writing. In the process, at some point
> he told us we could delete Order T
Robin Anson @ 2006-6-04 11:23:39 PM
"Attachments open with a different name"
>> I don't think it is directly a bug. TB must deal with the temporary
>> files somehow.
> True, but why not in the same way it does with attachments stored
> separately?
When The Bat! is extracting/decoding the file,
Mark Partous @ 2006-6-05 5:36:52 AM
"Virtual Memory overuse"
> So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all?
No. I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft.
They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people.
--
Chris
Using The Bat! v3.80.
ON Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 9:00:54 AM, you wrote:
PM> Hi Gerard,
PM> Tuesday, May 30, 2006, 10:11:07 PM, you wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to version 3.80.06 and found that my filters that auto
>> forward some received msgŽs leave out the attachment. Before you ask, no I
>> do not have that opti
Hello Ken & everyone else,
on 05-Jun-2006 at 17:06 you (Ken) wrote:
> I've noticed this when running TB in conjunction with Opera 9 Beta.
> If I shut down Opera TB behaves itself. I use straight POP3, no IMAP.
I'm using Opera9 beta as well and I don't see that behaviour. TB & Opera
running for
Hello Jack!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 10:11 PM, you wrote:
> I just read your response to my note 0017086 and I realized (too late)
> that I had not paid enough attention to the text in your note 0016886.
> Had I been able to summon the requisite number of functioning brain
> cells I would have s
Hello Curtis,
On Sunday, June 4, 2006, 10:19:41 PM, you wrote:
> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I
> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual
> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently
> using 512MB of VM!
Hello Jernej,
Monday, June 5, 2006, 2:48:10 PM, you wrote:
JS> On Monday, June 5, 2006, 11:36:52, Mark Partous wrote:
>> So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all? :-)
JS> Never - these programs are a scam, plain and simple.
Scam: fraudulent act, deception, swindle
On Monday, June 5, 2006, 11:36:52, Mark Partous wrote:
> So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all? :-)
Never - these programs are a scam, plain and simple. The only thing they're
capable of doing is pushing programs out of RAM to the swap file, which
wouldn't help at a
Hello all,
Monday, June 5, 2006, Admin at AK wrote:
> In Spam filter plgu-ins can someone explain to em:
> 'Average'/'Maximal'/'Minimal'
> settings?
> I use Agava Anti-Spam with the percetnage setting down to 20 now and the
> above setting at Average.
it has sense if You have "more" antispam
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:39:57 +0200, "Roelof Otten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On a German list somebody wrote about TB using an increasing amount of
> RAM while using IMAP accounts without an internet connection. I don't
> know whether this is relevant, but I like to hear myself talking. ;-)
I'm
In Spam filter plgu-ins can someone explain to em:
'Average'/'Maximal'/'Minimal'
settings?
I use Agava Anti-Spam with the percetnage setting down to 20 now and the
above setting at Average.
Still there are significant quantities of PSam getting through - oddly
particualrly to one account (I h
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 at 10:32:09 +0200, Alexander wrote:
>> True, but why not in the same way it does with attachments stored
>> separately?
>
> I am not Ritlabs and can't answer that. :-)
That's okay, it was a rhetorical question anyway. ;-)
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.80.06
Windows XP 5.1
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:40:31 +0200GMT (5-6-2006, 11:40 +0200, where I
live), Mark Partous wrote:
> Monday, June 5, 2006, 7:45:24 AM, you wrote:
HMdB>> As some sort of back up I have Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (20060516) with
HMdB>> Enigmail 0.94 at hand.
> Can that be used "offline"? Not being able to
Hello Henk,
Monday, June 5, 2006, 7:45:24 AM, you wrote:
HMdB> As some sort of back up I have Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (20060516) with
HMdB> Enigmail 0.94 at hand.
Can that be used "offline"? Not being able to stop TB from getting mail
still annoys me since the process stops the computer from runni
Hello Roelof,
Monday, June 5, 2006, 10:39:57 AM, you (and Curtis) wrote:
C>> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I
C>> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual
C>> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently
C>>
Hallo Curtis,
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:19:41 -0500GMT (5-6-2006, 5:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I
C> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual
C> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB!
Hello Robin Anson & everyone else,
on 05-Jun-2006 at 05:23 you (Robin Anson) wrote:
>> I don't think it is directly a bug. TB must deal with the temporary
>> files somehow.
> True, but why not in the same way it does with attachments stored
> separately?
I am not Ritlabs and can't answer that.
Hello MFPA & everyone else,
on 05-Jun-2006 at 01:28 you (MFPA) wrote:
>> If you store the attachments in the message body, the attachment must
>> be extracted from the messagebase and saved as a temporary file
>> before opening it. Thats the "different name" you're seeing.
> Other mail clients I
28 matches
Mail list logo
