Associating active account with specific email addresses
I have two active accounts set up in The Bat. Some mail I want to send through one account and some through the other. While in the editor, I know I can select the active account. But is there any way of this being done automatically based on the recipients email address. -- Best regards, Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Associating active account with specific email addresses
Howdy Graham, Sunday, October 22, 2006, 9:14:05 AM, Graham wrotened: I have two active accounts set up in The Bat. Some mail I want to send through one account and some through the other. While in the editor, I know I can select the active account. But is there any way of this being done automatically based on the recipients email address. In your templates put in %ACCOUNT=your account this should set the active account automatically based on the template invoked. -- Have Fun, Ben Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] crashing The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 He who laughs last thinks slowest. Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Associating active account with specific email addresses
Hello Graham, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:14:05 +0100 GMT (22/10/2006, 15:14 +0700 GMT), Graham Smith wrote: GS While in the editor, I know I can select the active account. But is GS there any way of this being done automatically based on the recipients GS email address. Yes. In the addressbook template, use the %Account= macro. -- Cheers, Thomas. Beim Roten Kreuz widmen sich Maenner und Frauen der Liebe. Manche tun es umsonst, andere bekommen es bezahlt. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Associating active account with specific email addresses
Hello Graham, On Sunday, October 22, 2006, 10:14:05 AM, which was 11:48:22 AM where I am, you wrote: GS I have two active accounts set up in The Bat. GS Some mail I want to send through one account and some through the GS other. GS While in the editor, I know I can select the active account. But is GS there any way of this being done automatically based on the recipients GS email address. I have three active accounts. I'd suggest the first thing to do would be to form a group, in the address book, for individual recipients, e.g. Colleagues, Family, etc. Then you right click on the name of the group in order to define its properties. In New Message you put %ACCOUNT=GS1Hello %tofname, [where 'GS1' would be your first active account] etc etc -- Regards, Maurice Using The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP Pro 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Associating active account with specific email addresses
Hello all, Sunday, October 22, 2006, 11:01:50 AM, you wrote: In New Message you put %ACCOUNT=GS1Hello %tofname, [where 'GS1' would be your first active account] etc etc Thanks all, amazingly easy when you know how -- Best regards, Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB! and GnuPG (and PGP)
Mica, Monday, October 16, 2006, 10:08:22 PM, you wrote: MM setpref (and here you choose wanted hashes -- see the table below) MM ...and then when you are finished, you type in this... MM save MM ...hit [enter] button and your key preferences are updated. MM The list of abbreviations for algorithms is here... MM## MM# Cipher-Algos:# Digest-Algos:# Compress-Algos: # MM## MM ...so you can choose what you prefer (you may choose them all and what MM is not applicable will be simply omitted), and write it in the form... MM setpref S10 S9 S8 (and so on) H11 H10 (etc) Z3 Z2 (etc) I've created a new key and tried to add some preferences per the above, but am now stymied: how do I select which one I want it to use? I want the default to be SHA256, but no matter what I've tried it stills uses SHA1. Obviously I'm doing something wrong. - -- Thanks, Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Please support BT wish 5275
Hello all, Sorry for cross-posting. One year ago I submitted this BT wish: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5275 I would kindly ask you to support it. If you agree with it, of course. Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and GnuPG (and PGP)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 22 Oct 2006,
@ @ at 16:19:31 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
I've created a new key and tried to add some preferences per the
above, but am now stymied: how do I select which one I want it to use?
I want the default to be SHA256, but no matter what I've tried it
stills uses SHA1. Obviously I'm doing something wrong.
No, you are doing that quite fine. It will just add SHA1, 3DES and ZIP,
Uncompressed by default, no matter what selection you choose otherwise.
This will do no harm, while a _lack_ of some of these features could.
There is just one thing you have to do and this is to set the default
algorithm in your gpg.conf file. You just add this line in there...
digest-algo SHA256
...and it will be used as your default one. TBat will accept this too.
~.~
(There are people who still use MD5 for instance, but for other purposes
than signing/encrypting, like making MD5/SHA1 hashes for/of various
files and so. -- I like to use TIGER192 algorithm for such purposes and
to confuse them. (-: Besides, it is more complex and tricky and is
created by a quite different and modern technology.)
Basically, it is safer to encrypt a TBat backup file(s), and the \Mail
folder (when is not in use, for instance), using some fine algorithm in
GnuPG, than to use TBat's EOTF (so called Encryption On The Fly),
since those are very different technologies and of very different
quality. (In TBat the EOTF is added more for a fancy reasons than to be
of a real and safe use.)
Add to this the fact that corporative, NSA, algorithms (the whole SHA
family, forced in and by PGP, where RIPEMD belongs to as well pretty
much, after the technology used in the process of its conception) are
being constantly attacked by Chineses (and they are really good in it,
having some mystic exotic tricks in mathematics, and in general), so
that is safer to use something else (or a SHA with more bits, for now,
256 and higher) for privacy/civil(ian) purposes.
(Today's, altered, PGP of course will not admit this, it's their job,
and will kick, gasp, wiggle and scratch, it's usual behavior, will deny
and oppose, but the very fact that user today has to give all that
private data -- it's incredible that many really do that -- and just in
order to download _privacy_ protecting software should speak for itself,
no. The smell is quite easy to feel far and wide.)
***
All of that should be given a more careful consideration on the side of
TBat developers as well, when they are going to do something real
quality, solid and reliable as to the some encryption feature built in
into The Flying Mammal / Letuchaya mish / {P|Š}išmiš / Leteći
sis{oje|avac|ar}.
- --
Mica
~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~
GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/
[Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo Vector ~ Wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4298 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32)
iQEVAwUBRTt8LLSpHvHEUtv8AQg2Igf/do76o/jHHGqKVJ4M1M5xtKnuNuLQAw6y
/rXc49TI3F5SuSdK49mkDlk09khzvw/WEcvdQgHhszbRW/0aZpZ7YY7K8o4etHRz
nNQOYUQJwBe4F1+rn8Hspb+mu4amG06PRpiwDpuMKvYRpp4RzywWCTn7KZKjP0op
2hvM5uRxlPD4u0I9099uDFXDUUp/bOa7Jd2Aa2B0cxJbsS12P//SrFKP0DxTq27T
zcYOIKTeLRe9wVFakep3P3Q2r4yIlWo0hoY1fOpe+kNXflCKZVlRFnOSMm3/mJDi
eLjhFljqMoeKZlqQ5WMaDhLCtnLnYNff8/OtMTirSBGd6TBR2EwT3A==
=MjMy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB! and GnuPG (and PGP)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mica, Sunday, October 22, 2006, 7:11:57 PM, you wrote: MM There is just one thing you have to do and this is to set the default MM algorithm in your gpg.conf file. You just add this line in there... MM digest-algo SHA256 MM ...and it will be used as your default one. TBat will accept this too. It worked - thanks! MM Basically, it is safer to encrypt a TBat backup file(s), and the \Mail MM folder (when is not in use, for instance), using some fine algorithm in MM GnuPG, than to use TBat's EOTF (so called Encryption On The Fly), MM since those are very different technologies and of very different MM quality. (In TBat the EOTF is added more for a fancy reasons than to be MM of a real and safe use.) I thought about switching to TB! Pro for the EOTF, but decided not to. I just installed TrueCrypt, and may move mail files to an encrypted drive there. Of course, that would require starting it up first, but I could probably remember that after a few false starts. Thanks again for all of your help. I think I'm getting GnuPG to the point that I can safely uninstall PGP. - -- Cheers, Rick -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.52 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJFO4Y0AAoJELf6ImSjvaeWQoIP/AtAltzjYvX00Vi+5ByLbrPD nnLgK3P+Rem8MiB2AyMXWe9iiwvfJC4EF1kaes5k2HfSYnESni/q9qiS1zWk6DRy YzgesLaQqB4UowtXK1s7BabHo601kN4hoN35bFFQ5mj51uuY1On7xnbA9//6E/Bb 8jZHsgsDaXJ1FKTgEynoOBFS5iT7B+G+zgXk9W5F/Hv5jPj8gSH8+b3jvwqkYAZ5 x/rVeAN8nXbsYCEhtbHAS55GEGmpbUX8+kY6S5FSixYAOTcNNEdEpAH91d1xoNs6 6eAvpUXXranq8qLmCdbt0qqB5YlWK+Lw+xHpVRB6brua6JMGSzkF6A7fzlUkk0iT ZkHsirKZKwUF+NvcGvBfiY/uAM5fIKpax0wkLXTZdiKfSHjvGNw2qpgGqopuOfex 3iu6R/pc8iLxpKrSFv2U/u8JGtewFgJfXrXdM8WdFgf9k53jXDGsU/fmvQUM7KFX bYuGWRLqE/orz9qF19cuoB3fNjJphiw+tjoIGnXh1To71kKlpcG2E67D+gKDEUH2 XI+Ky0SRyZHDLk8ZV6hcpvvZTYt83yClXZ56hJ9adouPHsE0xy8hiyRA07IPrsI0 GycRkGwRlYalCe4xYr+JEQZVhcASUdIDk9dDJyDYP9mBecUYeaGZ+kEwdyuquJmk mV/STfOR9f4tnKIvQDWR =d8OO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Have you ever missed the possibility of assigning more than 1 Colour Group?
Hello all, Ever since many years ago I moved to TB from my beloved Virtual Access I have missed a feature VA had, Bookmarks. At first sight, if you know what VA's Bookmarks did, you may think that TB's Colour Groups do exactly the same. But this is only true at first sight. The difference is that in TB you assign Colour Groups to messages and in VA you assigned messages to Bookmarks. And what this actually means is that you can ONLY assign one Color Group to a message while in VA you could assign a message to several Bookmarks. I have about 20 Color Groups defined in TB and there are many times that I would want to assign 2 or 3 (or more) C.G. to a message and this way appear in 2 or 3 (or more) of the Common VFs that I use to display all messages in a CG. Why can't a message belong to the categories (Color Groups) 'Important', 'Waiting Response', 'For Reference?, 'Offers', or whatever? Aside of others, I know that one of the difficulties of implementing 'multiple Color Groups' would be the colour and/or font to use to highlight the message. Because I have missed a Bookmark feature so much, along time I have tried to emulate it in different ways. For example, including some keyword in the Memo field and the creating some VFs filtering on thses keyword. It works, but it is not an easy way of doing it. You have to open the Memo and edit it to type the keyword(s), save it and close it. A bit cumbersome, prone to errors, you have to remember all keywords and it may interfere with the normal use of Memo. But, just today, I have found a much better way (almost perfect) to emulate Bookmarks. By using one of the not too well known (and perhaps not enough appreciated) features in TB, Chat/Watch Folders. What I have done is create several Common Chant Folders, one per Bookmark. That way, I can can right click on a message and on the context menu select Special/Watch replies in... and the Bookmark. I can repeat this to assign the message to more bookmarks or, very important, to remove the message from one bookmark. The only drawback I have found, so far, using this method is that _replies_, if they come, will also be displayed in bookmark folders as, after all, they are Watch Folders. Also, having to select 'Watch replies in...' is not too intuitive. This is why I am suggesting the implementation of a Bookmarks feature in TB based in the existing code for Chat Folders, by allowing a new type of VF called Bookmarks instead of Chat Folders, that would not be displayed along real Watch Folders when doing a 'Watch replies in..', with a different menu entry like Special/Bookmark and, of course, that would not 'bookmark' and display possible replies. I really believe it would be a great additional feature and should not bee too difficult to implement. If you would like to support the wish for this new feature... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6057 TIA. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello MAU, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M You owe me a debatable beer That made me chortle our loud :-) OK, with pleasure. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.2 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Favorite Macro?
Hello tbudl, Just curious here. What are a few of the favorite macros used by tb users here? I dont want to miss out on anything really cool :) -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello MAU, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M Sorry for cross-posting. That's interesting because all four of both of your cross posted mails mails (the other message about assigning more than one colour group being the other) came to TBBETA for me. That's because my TBBETA filter is above the normal TB! one so it just picked that address out of the two. Presumably you have a filter (or at least I hope you do, having sent the messages like that) that can differentiate between the first and second addresses in a mail and which is the most important. If so could you share it because I wouldn't have the faintest idea how to create one that works and keeps all the relevant messages in the relevant folders. Am I the only one who hasn't received one of each of your messages in both TBUDL and TBBETA I wonder? -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.2 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello Feli, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] FW I use Header field reply-to contains to distinguish between lists, FW works perfect. Thanks, I'll set my filters accordingly. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.2 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Favorite Macro?
Hello Darrin everyone else, on 22-Okt-2006 at 18:34 you (Darrin) wrote: Just curious here. What are a few of the favorite macros used by tb users here? I dont want to miss out on anything really cool :) There's no question about it: %- Used to stack multiple lines of macros without adding extra LFs. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) A cookie store is a bad idea. Besides, the market research reports say America likes crispy cookies, not soft and chewy cookies like you make. -- Response to Debbi Fields' idea of starting Mrs. Fields' Cookies. Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello Richard, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:49:01 +0200GMT Richard Wakeford wrote: RW That's interesting because all four of both of your cross posted mails RW mails (the other message about assigning more than one colour group RW being the other) came to TBBETA for me. That's because my TBBETA filter RW is above the normal TB! one so it just picked that address out of the RW two. I use Header field reply-to contains to distinguish between lists, works perfect. -- Regards, Feli The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Favorite Macro?
Hello Alexander, Sunday, October 22, 2006, 1:15:34 PM, you wrote: There's no question about it: %- Used to stack multiple lines of macros without adding extra LFs. :-) I havent used TB in a long long time and just started using it again a few days ago. Whats Extra LFs? -- Best regards, Darrinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello Richard,
Presumably you have a filter (or at least I hope you do, having sent the
messages like that) that can differentiate between the first and second
addresses in a mail and which is the most important. If so could you
share it because I wouldn't have the faintest idea how to create one
that works and keeps all the relevant messages in the relevant folders.
For TB lists I use 1 filter with 4 sub-filters. These:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [EABE5B6A.01C48E14.7EA9333D.41A9F835]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IsActive
endFilter
1
beginFilter
UID: [3FF052A0.01C48D53.4E9CD9A0.3E4F4425]
Name: TBUDL
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Reply-to`0`tbudl\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CThe\20Bat\5CTBUDL
IsActive
IsSendQueue
endFilter
1
beginFilter
UID: [3FF052A0.01C48D53.63DBAABB.6D3345AB]
Name: TBBeta
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Reply-to`0`tbbeta\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CThe\20Bat\5CTBBeta
IsActive
IsSendQueue
endFilter
1
beginFilter
UID: [3FF052A0.01C48D53.23514E5E.07F783DB]
Name: TBTech
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Reply-to`0`tbtech\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CThe\20Bat\5CTBTech
IsActive
IsSendQueue
endFilter
1
beginFilter
UID: [3FF052A0.01C48D53.42AEC149.4363EE71]
Name: TBDev
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`Reply-to`0`tbdev\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMAU\5CMailing\20Lists\5CThe\20Bat\5CTBDev
IsActive
IsSendQueue
endFilter
If you copy and paste them in your Sorting Office, the only thing you
will have to change is the folder the messages are moved to.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta)
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello MAU, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M For TB lists I use 1 filter with 4 sub-filters. These: Thanks for sharing those with me. I did use Feli's method of Header field reply-to contains but your sub-filters under the one filter are neat so I've copied them across and changed the relevant bits. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.2 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot | CPU: Athlon 1.09 Ghz | RAM: 1024 MB Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Please support BT wish 5275
Hello Richard, M For TB lists I use 1 filter with 4 sub-filters. These: Thanks for sharing those with me. I did use Feli's method of Header field reply-to contains but your sub-filters under the one filter are neat so I've copied them across and changed the relevant bits. You owe me a debatable beer ;) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and GnuPG (and PGP)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 22 Oct 2006, @ @ at 19:55:06 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote: I thought about switching to TB! Pro for the EOTF, but decided not to. I thought of it too, some...670 days ago, it seemed pretty alluring, at first sight, but after had examined the thing more closely I had changed my mind. I just installed TrueCrypt, and may move mail files to an encrypted drive there. Of course, that would require starting it up first, but I could probably remember that after a few false starts. Oh, you will. (-: Besides, it's easier, and safer, if you put into an encrypted container both the Mail and TheBat folder (if you are only user of the Bat/machine), since this way if someone unauthorized triggers the shortcut (if s/he finds it in Start Menu), tBat will not start. Easiest way to do so is to simply mount this container/volume and then to install TBat there (and perhaps some other programs you wouldn't want others to tinker with). Thanks again for all of your help. I think I'm getting GnuPG to the point that I can safely uninstall PGP. You're welcome, this is the place for it, and I am besides right now preparing quite similar www tutorials for my correspondents/friends, so they can manage when I am not accessible. When you uninstall PGP, look after PGP*.* files in your OS|System folders, since all the chances are that they will not be deleted during the process. Also check the Registry (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\PGP) since PGP likes to leave its...PGPberries all around. This should be deleted too. After that, you'll notice that OS runs a bit faster and livelier. *** With PGP you may notice that when you mount your encrypted volumes, their paths will be recorded in index.dat files in Content.IE5 folders. Etc. With True Crypt it will not be the merry case. - -- Mica ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~ GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo Vector ~ Wine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4298 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32) iQEVAwUBRTvJ7bSpHvHEUtv8AQgDFQf/UPfB2Iw6sjl+cYZca7dt+DHN6d0OOmrM fhAqtvZdujshApsSGpyMmunDrmPhhM90NgmTF2aLWa5zJTVk4Ux+TT6KU5avdOXP Ao5SA8HFXDXYIjpAmccVB2zY9zkzG9rte4uc8o3hgzbW9k2qYTCc8CiYJHiI+Slm tCw5Ym4ZeEY98mNe4HF8JpoMubJZBxZJCAqjjaiguEjST//CQoBzOnHMT6ing9x+ 4aM7/jf66/Gc2M6Wx5A1u6pjUjo6FjlMKOLpr0Ab8n+5d1wsQisu0jHb6KxXqdlm xsIA7zORZzB5gBE4ZfYSbbP6Q4CMJ6xxHJgsLKpXan0RmE6uAh0syg== =YUEH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Favorite Macro?
Hello Chris, Sunday, October 22, 2006, 5:09:03 PM, you wrote: Line 1 %MACRO1%- %MACRO2%- Line 2 will produce Line 1 Line 2 Wow, how cool is that one. I didnt know about that. Thanks. -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB! and GnuPG (and PGP)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mica, Monday, October 23, 2006, 12:43:42 AM, you wrote: MM Oh, you will. (-: Besides, it's easier, and safer, if you put into an MM encrypted container both the Mail and TheBat folder (if you are only MM user of the Bat/machine), since this way if someone unauthorized MM triggers the shortcut (if s/he finds it in Start Menu), tBat will not MM start. I can only put my mail folders there, since my wife occasionally uses my computer as well. She would prefer to use Outlook, but she's getting more comfortable with TB, so I don't want to do anything to make that more difficult. MM You're welcome, this is the place for it, and I am besides right now MM preparing quite similar www tutorials for my correspondents/friends, MM so they can manage when I am not accessible. I look forward to seeing that. I still have a lot to learn. I know enough to use pgp/gpg, but would like to learn more so I know how to correct problems down the road, better choose among options, etc. MM When you uninstall PGP, look after PGP*.* files in your OS|System MM folders, since all the chances are that they will not be deleted during MM the process. Also check the Registry (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\PGP) MM since PGP likes to leave its...PGPberries all around. This should be MM deleted too. For now I plan to just let it sleep. My PGP key is still out there, and I occasionally get something encrypted to it; so far all I've ever received are test messages, but who knows - maybe someday someone will actually send me something substantive. :-) - -- Thanks, Rick -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.52 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJFPCycAAoJELf6ImSjvaeW2BsQAJydtP/cX4TyVfnc78XskI9F /gPPQzDcdyEr1fLJrgZGOdllYQ82+wfh9CcuFgvTRixj60ozGr6MlYMg2mWujJdA VmSoE9Z+kLZeqnrZ+D4j1qRkjqOf+A4eNg15jqtpmYVfqxiK1AuD7PxtUFtXsVBK oJdPLuHeCRVhCBysX5L+fXbbrOIRq+MY82ILlUC43vb/ItEuEASK2svVK6GFZe+6 ujBcrVc2Gp6zASy7LA6fFzwGTo9jjkCy7J+ieRO5MjGjWRxJULIc0BdfLGXSL+KS JGtQ04sbgxrFlSTobnp9LiWfRHdxlOyUJaG8oTZppYcEZ6Ce9+yd2TVq5LDOghvd F4Hrvm5vLyxXxaubEn6FPVhHwPmYyy+OeVDTpQIeeZL+kefIdFb3a/ywq+k2Jprb J8uhXts0+L/h/HaGBbnBqtTPIYC6Emln9yZ0khNonplOUjBW3jFbGpMWwV5cqJDK DpDLtLdUe0sN26eaedohgpT4aJkCoGc0yI+ZGwsIxR/sQOzyR9xKGvXIIcv7LTKp OrtGAPU5jdaNE60x6gBE6nUx19A99L7uR4Abz+V/DXsdfAhokGj8wiVZE/ATlg6j wVOCJ2S/Kpv21ONMVrDGQUxxO4IG0pudTbLZ+EsQRjICBjXxftYvn9dDK5Vi68mI ltOpRWZpsoRgtby6nvrQ =4/mD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Log files
Awhile ago I noticed that the log file for my main account has been getting rather large - 300MB at the moment. I don't need to log every single action indefinitely, so I went to account properties|options and checked verbose log, and then set the maximum size to 1MB. However, even after closing/restarting TB! the log file remains the same size. What am I missing? -- Thanks, Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Have you ever missed the possibility of assigning more than 1 Colour Group?
Hello MAU, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:35:59 +0200 GMT (22/10/2006, 23:35 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: M The difference is that in TB you assign Colour Groups to messages and in M VA you assigned messages to Bookmarks. And what this actually means is M that you can ONLY assign one Color Group to a message while in VA you M could assign a message to several Bookmarks. Oops, you keep cross-posting. I just replied on TBBETA that you can achieve what you need with virutal folders, if set-up correctly. And if I understood your problem and solution suggestion correctly from the beginning, that is. -- Cheers, Thomas. I shall always begin, start, initiate, take the first step, and/or write the first word, when I get around to it. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
