%CURSOR (was: Re: [SPAM?] Re: v10 beta 8)

2022-04-18 Thread Thomas ML
Hello Ira, Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 9:14:18 AM, you wrote: >> Using %CURSOR now, no difference. Why? > I noticed in my instance that 2 different accounts replies worked different, > one had $Cursor and was broken, and the other had $CURSOR and worked. > Changing the mixed case one to upper

Re: Filter for mutiple SENDERs

2022-04-18 Thread MAU
Hello Jack, > I need to trap a bunch of ever changing merchandise and/or > political ads. Each one is different. Even if it is an ever changing list of ads (senders), I still think the AB Groups is a much easier and cleaner way than the endless ORs or BLOCKS that you were trying. If

Re: Filter for mutiple SENDERs

2022-04-18 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello MAU, On Monday, April 18, 2022 you wrote: M> Hello Jack, >> Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far >> the >> only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender. >> Needless to >> say, this leads to a very large filter. M> Do you

Re: Filter for mutiple SENDERs

2022-04-18 Thread MAU
Hello Jack, > Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far the > only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender. > Needless to > say, this leads to a very large filter. Do you have all the senders in your Address Book? If yes, I would create

Filter for mutiple SENDERs

2022-04-18 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello TBUDL'ers, Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far the only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender. Needless to say, this leads to a very large filter. I've tried stacking each sender (separated by CRLFs) which didn't work and