Hello Paul,
On 5 Jul 2004 at 06:46:09 -0400 GMT [12:46 CEST] you wrote:
PC this is still a beta item,
Leif's stuff, yes.
PC not in the production product,
Here you are wrong. Smilies etc are supported in 2.11.
PC so I haven't
PC changed my sig in tbudl. In TBOT I do :) if you want to
Hello Britt,
On 6 Jul 2004 at 14:53:58 +0200 GMT [14:53 CEST] you wrote:
BH I've tried to use different view modes for different folders, without
BH success. In Options - Preferences - View Mode I have ticked the
BH folders I want to apply a certain mode to (in Use by), AND I have
BH marked it
Hello Shai,
On 10 Jul 2004 at 16:15:05 +0200 GMT [16:15 CEST] you wrote:
S Hello TBUDL, I wanted to know if you can help me find out
S how to add more identities to the dropdown list in the From: field.
S I use a different email for each mailing list that I'm on and I need
S to change the
Hello Code,
On 11 Jul 2004 at 10:28:06 -0700 GMT [19:28 CEST] you wrote:
C2 1. Is ongoing training necessary only when BayesIt misses spam or
C2 mis-identifies non-spam, or is something more required?
You only need to correct mistakes.
C2 2. Is there a point where training BayesIt doesn't
Hello Code,
On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:44:25 -0700 GMT [20:44 CEST] you wrote:
C2 I've noticed spam, now, often contains several rows of meaningless,
C2 random words, like:
C2 annul cripple jacobean hater metric deal prophesy diversify final
C2 I assume this is an attempt to foil Bayesian spam
Hello Douglas,
On 13 Jul 2004 at 12:18:35 -0500 GMT [19:18 CEST] you wrote:
DH The question is, how are the virtual folders implemented? It sounds
DH like messages from several accounts can be viewed in the same
DH window, al la Calypso (which has an account column).
They are folders that
Hello Jack,
On 21 Jul 2004 at 13:46:04 -0400 GMT [19:46 CEST] you wrote:
J I
J don't want my personal information showing up in the header of the
J mails I send out.
If you just want to change the from address you can do that with the
%from macro.
--
Cheers,
Andre
If everything seems under
Hello Tim,
On 23 Jul 2004 at 15:09:56 -0400 GMT [21:09 CEST] you wrote:
TM Is there any way to find out what any given message scored when
TM BayseIt checked it?
working directory\bayesit.log
--
Cheers,
Andre
Träume nicht dein Leben,
sondern lebe deinen Traum!
Hello Allie,
On 27 Jul 2004 at 08:41:18 -0500 GMT [15:41 CEST] you wrote:
AM St - Musaic.Net, [SMN] wrote:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
button + M and see for yourself.
AM TB! disappears/minimizes here.
It depends on wether you have tb! set to show in the
Hello Mary,
On 31 Jul 2004 at 06:19:09 -0500 GMT [13:19 CEST] you wrote:
Brrr. In the middle of night.
MB One thing that continually jars me from that set--and I haven't
MB customized it out of my own, because I want to see what other people
MB are typing to me as
Hello Mary,
On 31 Jul 2004 at 08:45:04 -0500 GMT [15:45 CEST] you wrote:
MB What version of The Bat! are you using, Andre?
Same as you as my headers show.
,- [ ]
| Smiley = .\Default\smile.gif, 0, :) :-), smile
| Smiley = .\Default\sad.gif, 0, :( :-(, sad
| Smiley = .\Default\tungue.gif,
Hello Mary,
On 31 Jul 2004 at 09:57:51 -0500 GMT [16:57 CEST] you wrote:
MB What version of The Bat! are you using, Andre?
AW Same as you as my headers show.
MB I went to Specials/View Source (F9), and I could not see the mailer in
MB the list.
It's there though. You don't need to look in the
Hello Morgan,
On 2 Aug 2004 at 21:08:55 +0100 GMT [22:08 CEST] you wrote:
According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
the latest version:
%STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATSPAMERLETTERS(hours)
Hello Robert,
On 3 Aug 2004 at 13:49:42 +0300 GMT [12:49 CEST] you wrote:
RG Is it possible to have all messages classified by BeyesIt! as junk
RG be marked as unread when they get to the Junk folder? Just to make
RG sure I do not overlook the legitimate mail.
Hello Terry,
On 3 Aug 2004 at 14:05:45 -0700 GMT [23:05 CEST] you wrote:
Therefore, everything below it is quoted upon Reply, when Macros for
quoting are in a person's template.
TGM What am I missing? I use macros for quoting but nothing below
TGM Michael's cutline is quoted. ~shrug~
Since
Hello omn,
On 4 Aug 2004 at 10:23:44 +0800 GMT [04:23 CEST] you wrote:
o Spam frequency dictionary:
o Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost.
Looks like you have a problem with your spam dictionary. Check
working directory\base\spamdict.bye
--
Cheers,
Andre
The meeting of two
Hello Gunivortus,
On 7 Aug 2004 at 10:31:19 +0200 GMT [10:31 CEST] you wrote:
GG Hi,
GG wanna start with some experiments, using TB (2.13.b3) as
GG mailserver, but forgot if I installed it as Server.
GG Where can I check that?
Options-NetworkAdministration-This machine is..
--
Cheers,
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 09:28:34 -0400 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote:
DJ BTW, I do not understand very well the regarding threshold
DJ parameter, can someone explain it please?
From advanced.ini:
; this number shows, how much heavier non-spam tokens than spam. It
makes some kind of guard
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 11:30:32 -0400 GMT [17:30 CEST] you wrote:
DJ Yes, I am aware of its definition, but what I don't understand
DJ is what would be the effect of changing it to, say, 1.2 from 1.5
DJ (apart from the academic answer of making non-spam tokens a bit less
DJ heavier).
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:42:17 -0400 GMT [20:42 CEST] you wrote:
DJ That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is
DJ calculated? I can assume it is the product of its initial
DJ probability by the regarding threshold value, is that true?
I don't program the thing. For specific
Hello MikeD,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
M I have been following this thread since I have been having some
M problems too. I was using the old version (0.4gm) until I upgraded to
M the current version of TB.
M The settings I used to use don't seem to work any
Hello Michael,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:48:35 -0700 GMT [06:48 CEST] you wrote:
MLW How can I tell the score of individual messages using BayesIT 5.11? I
MLW have looked in BayesIT.log and cannot figure it out. Any assistance
MLW would be appreciated.
Graham: 1
Spam-grade: 1
That's the spam
Hello Jan,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 08:14:15 -0400 GMT [14:14 CEST] you wrote:
JR Are you saying that the black/white list rules are basically +/- 99
No, I wasn't speaking about blacklists at all. I think whitlisted mails
get a score of 0, blacklisted of 100 and the rest is 1..99.
--
Cheers,
Andre
Hello Michael,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 20:47:10 -0700 GMT [05:47 CEST] you wrote:
MLW My current macro set is
MLW =
MLW Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION)
MLW Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24)
MLW Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24)
Hello Jan,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:01:13 -0400 GMT [22:01 CEST] you wrote:
JR Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to
JR be stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs
JR before TB! filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I
JR can't get a
Hello Peter,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
PK Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
PK The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab.
PK TIA
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit0511.rar
--
Cheers,
Hello Zonnet,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:52:57 +0200 GMT [21:52 CEST] you wrote:
Z ,- [ ]
Z | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z | Spam traffic: %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(48)
Z | Stat no spam leters: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z | Stat no spam Trafic: %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(48)
Z | Stat spam letters:
Hello Jan,
On 26 Aug 2004 at 19:18:06 -0400 GMT [01:18 CEST] you wrote:
JR Anyone have any ideas beyond the notion that the macros don't
JR work. Or put it another way, has anyone found that the macros do
JR work represent some real numbers?
My junk folder shows 57 mails from the last 24
Hello Bob,
On 26 Aug 2004 at 13:14:29 +1000 GMT [05:14 CEST] you wrote:
BM I don't use XP but if you want to avoid a very large download you can
BM order the update on CD for free from Microsoft at this address:
BM
BM
Hello Eddie,
On 1 Sep 2004 at 16:32:22 +0200 GMT [16:32 CEST] you wrote:
EC I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the exact link. Can someone
EC post it please? Thanks ...
I don't know what's wrong with the newer ones but 0.59 you can get here:
Hello Dan,
On 2 Sep 2004 at 18:35:40 -0400 GMT [00:35 CEST] you wrote:
DG BayesIt's history.txt says:
DG Version 0.6.0 - this version is written to be included in
DG The Bat! 3.0 distribution
DG Is anyone successfully using BayesIt 0.6.0 with TheBat! 2.12.00?
Yes.
--
Cheers,
Hello Mary,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 08:28:38 -0500 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote:
MB Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll:
MB 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : :
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
I vote for * * :p
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre
Hello MAU,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 23:40:24 +0200 GMT [23:40 CEST] you wrote:
M I think I've read somewhere, maybe in TBBeta, that the light will be
M discontinued. But don't take my word for it.
Do you have any idea what I thought when I read this? I was like I
don't want light to be discontinued.
Hello rich,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 13:17:44 -0400 GMT [19:17 CEST] you wrote:
rg Anyone have comments on the 2.x versions at my (free) disposal?
rg 2.04.7 - the version I am (still) on
rg 2.11.02 - a version still available on the site for download
rg 2.12 - a version still available on the
Hello Mary,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 10:57:06 -0500 GMT [17:57 CEST] you wrote:
MB :grin: Okay. 4 * * 1
MB But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis,
I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show emphasis
which is seldom enough i use underscores.
I realize I'm not coming
Hello John,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 02:30:05 +1000 GMT [18:30 CEST] you wrote:
JP As a matter of interest, does anyone know if RTitlabs read this list at all?
At least some of them do. I remeber Stef and 9Val posting here in the
past.
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre
Hello Michael,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 09:46:30 -0700 GMT [18:46 CEST] you wrote:
MLW Is there an announcement for BayesIT? If not, how do I know when a
MLW new version is released?
From time to time try the download url with increased version number.
Then see if you get a download or 404.
From time
Hello MAU,
On 4 Sep 2004 at 16:52:30 +0200 GMT [16:52 CEST] you wrote:
M Traditionally on the net, asterisks mean *bold*, underscores mean
M _underlined_, slashes mean /italics/, etc.
I know. :) And my text is either naked or underlined.
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre
Hello Paul,
On 7 Sep 2004 at 23:23:19 +0100 GMT [00:23 CEST] you wrote:
PJ So I have to retrain each time I upgrade the BayesIT plugin. That
PJ seems rather painful.
No. Only when upgrading from v0.4 or older.
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre Windows XP
Hello Dan,
On 9 Sep 2004 at 10:00:57 -0400 GMT [16:00 CEST] you wrote:
Right click on the preview pane: Message Reply to All quoting
selected text. (In v2.12)
DG Doesn't work on my system. Are you using 2.12.00?
What doesn't work? Try it: Look at a message in the preview pane not in
it's
Hello Mary,
On 9 Sep 2004 at 06:45:07 -0500 GMT [13:45 CEST] you wrote:
MB Later, gator, perhaps? I'm using Sygate (free) right now. Just began
MB with that last week. So far, so good. Only thing is that a splash
MB Register now? screen comes up every time at boot. Otherwise, it's
MB faithful,
Hello Joe,
On 9 Sep 2004 at 15:05:50 -0400 GMT [21:05 CEST] you wrote:
J I am having a problem using the junk controls. I have the bayeslt
J plugin installed. If I set the threshold to 99 all e-mail comes in OK
J as NOT junk. If I set it to 98 most all e-mail comes in as junk
J except the
Hello admin,
On 21 Sep 2004 at 22:18:24 +0100 GMT [23:18 CEST] you wrote:
aacu OK - could you please, please find a moment to tell me which of the
aacu many BayesIt and bayesit directories scattered around that I now seem
aacu to have, I actually need?
Only two:
- the folder where you extracted
Hello MikeD,
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 8:08:39 PM, you wrote:
SMK I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK remember its version number.
That would 0.5.11. It is what I continue
Hello Kara,
Friday, October 22, 2004, 1:30:01 AM, you wrote:
G'day
I've just started using the Linux distro Fedora Core 1.
Can TB! be used as Fedora's e-mail client or is use of TB! limited only
to those using a Windows O/S?
There is no linux version of the bat! But there's a way.
Hello Chris,
Friday, October 22, 2004, 1:54:22 AM, you wrote:
You may have to jump through some hoops to get The Bat! to install
until COO or WINE supports MSI installers.
As Kara is still using v2 that shouldn't be a problem.
--
Best regards,
Andre
The Bat!
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 5:33:57 PM, you wrote:
My mistake, somewhere in between the mails I started mixing things up. I
did not mean TB's messagebase, but a unix messagebase (plain text format),
or a .eml | .msg attachment (when exported). Those are usually covered with
Hello Marek,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 4:12:33 PM, you wrote:
TB never stored msgbases in plain text format like Netscape (Unix
mailbox). There were two formats of msgbases, first was used until
1.41 version, actually used format was introduced in 1.42 version and
is the same until 3.x.
All
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500, Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Greetings:
I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of
97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a
problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses
and automatically
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
I cannot find a
setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete)
automatically either.
I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set the option
even without an installed plugin. See
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:11:23 +0100, Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
the mail from disk, which it
Hello Nav,
Friday, December 10, 2004, 12:41:33 PM, you wrote:
Has anyone tried running TB on Linux using Wine?
See sig.
Does Ritlabs have any plans to release Linux version of TB.
They had plans once. But I think they've given them up long ago.
--
Best regards,
Andre
The Bat! v2.12.00
Hello Nav,
Saturday, December 11, 2004, 4:07:43 PM, you wrote:
Is there any direct less-cumbersome way to transfer all mails from TB
to Evolution (Linux)?
I have too many subdirectories in TB and going to each of them
archiving as unix mailbox is too much work. I want maintain TB
Hello ken,
Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 5:15:36 AM, you wrote:
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 11:46:45 AM, you wrote:
I think the critical point is in the menu View -- Global View
Mode. This should be set to No View Mode, then the special folder
views will stick.
OK, got
Hello Paul,
Saturday, December 18, 2004, 11:10:45 PM, you wrote:
E.g. Created an Inbox Mode and a SentMode, saved and set to apply to
particular folders, but whichever was last used applies to all
folders.
This is a new problem since moving to Version 3.
And you have View-Global Viewode
Hello Watcher,
Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 11:15:31 PM, you wrote:
Strange I never got it, maybe my exim/sa setup caught it :)
No, he missed the little check mark you have to make to say don't
send me your important spam or misinterpreted it, I didn't get any
either but I'm very careful
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 6:16:58 PM, you wrote:
So, before I forget. Merry Christmas to all and a wonderful 2005!!!
Merry Christmas and Happy new year to you and the rest of the list.
--
Best regards,
Andre
The Bat! v2.12.00 on Suse Linux 9.1 (wine 20041201)
Hello capocasa,
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 7:58:16 PM, you wrote:
When I go to this address
http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/
to search for a subject the search button doesn't work. Seems to
defeat the purpose. Am I missing something?
Hmm. I've searched via
Hello Nick,
Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 11:26:34 PM, you wrote:
Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal
with questions involving earlier versions of TB!?
Not at all. There are even some still around who use v2, take me for
example. But you are using an old version even in terms of
Hello Dean,
Sunday, May 29, 2005, 2:40:25 AM, you wrote:
I looked at those settings and mine were the same. When I get back
home again, I'm going to check if there is something in
administration/maintenance or grouping ?? grasping at straws.
I'm using v2 so I don't know how it's in v3
Hello Darrin,
Wednesday, June 15, 2005, 2:01:12 PM, you wrote:
I get an error that reads Cannot find specified file when I open
up an email that is html and I click on the html attachment to view
it in my browser. Even though the error shows up, I still can view
the file in my
Hello qe3ee,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 6:11:40 PM, you wrote:
I have laborated with various values from the kludges.
Example: From: yourname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
only filters the threads that i have replied my self
- i.e. it only filters threads someoneelse started.
I'm not sure what
Hello list,
Is there any way to use the watch feature without having a mail-chat
window popping up everytime a new mail in that thread arrives? I know
the chat folders are used by both thread-watching and mail-chat but no
chat setting seems to have any effect on thread-watching. Why does
Hello Munango-Keewati,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 5:57:23 AM, you wrote:
I just upgraded to 3.60.07 and find that the Header information (From,
Subject, Date, etc.) that normally appears above the preview window
and at the top of the full-page message reader window is no longer
visible.
Hello Marten,
Saturday, December 24, 2005, 12:33:16 AM, you wrote:
Could anyone using multiple POP3 accounts with The Bat, tell me what
anti=spam system they use and could you provide a four or five word
recommendation?
I have two accounts but have settled to only using spam filtering on
Hello Alexander,
Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:18:43 PM, you wrote:
Hello Andre Wichartz everyone else,
on 26-Dez-2005 at 12:53 you (Andre Wichartz) wrote:
Two of the really really bad bugs affect tagging of messages found to be
spam: One is adding the header to the body area of a message
Hello rich,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 2:16:58 AM, you wrote:
I did look at the properties|filters screen but alas, no. There is no
AGE option there. :(
Select Use Filter, click on Any message, select age. Should be
pretty straightforward from there...
--
Best regards,
Andre
The Bat! v2.12
Hello pr1,
Friday, March 10, 2006, 6:13:10 PM, you wrote:
I have a dozen email accounts and I've been using Popfile on the main one
but I'd like to try something better because it's a resource hog.
Funny. I just returned to popfile because all the others I've tried
didn't work for me. It also
Hello Admin,
Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 1:52:31 PM, you wrote:
At the moment all i seem to be able to do is save them as single messages
as EML or MSG - since I can;t see thatTB will import a txt file (which is
theonly way I can seem to get a bunch of email messages sabved in one go.
Export to
Hello Marten,
Sunday, June 18, 2006, 10:47:30 PM, you wrote:
PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
that works properly with TB
Don't think this has to do with tb! but it is the only usable spam
filter for me. Now if there just weren't these crashes...
--
Hello Kelvin,
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 9:25:25 AM, you wrote:
Is there a way to retain the ease and functionality of the Sort by
Reference view but yet still retain the Gmail-way?
Gmail-way is the manner in which Gmail threads emails (as
conversations) and use date and time of the last
On Saturday, September 16, 2017 11:05:55 PM Richie G wrote:
> Many years ago I used TB! (2.12*) and loved it, then [stuff happened]
> and I find myself now needing TB! more than ever.
When I upgraded from v2 to v6 I just installed v6 over the v2 install.
That worked mostly fine, except that
101 - 172 of 172 matches
Mail list logo