Re: Incredimail testimonials ?

2006-05-26 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi Wil, Hi Wil Friday, May 26, 2006, 4:27:42 PM, you wrote: > She wants to install Incredimail. > I do not have any opinion, but just afraid about spyware and trojans or > worms... Spyware > during install, and worms and trojans during using it, and for recipients of > mails made by > Incred

Re: [unclassified] Re: Stopping Virtual folders from marking read

2006-05-17 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi Chris, Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 5:24:06 AM, you wrote: >> I've set all my accounts up to only mark as read when the message is >> opened up in a new window but I can't seem to find this option for >> virtual folders. > Account Properties -> Options -> Uncheck "Mark messages as read..." > Doe

Re: Other spam catching systems

2004-04-26 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 26 April 2004 at 22:15 Dave Gorman said: >> I want something to sit between The Bat and the various POP servers >> that will identify as best it can, any Spam and let it through to me >> marked as such so I can filter it and check it once in a while for >> mis-categorized spam. > After a s

Re: Account Tree and scroll bar

2004-04-24 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 24 April 2004 at 23:50 Richard Wakeford said: > Hello, > Just come across a very small but totally repeatable bug. > Select "View/Toolbars/Configuration" and all works fine. However, remove > the Configuration toolbar and the Account tree scroll bar refuses to > work. It's still possible

Re: Strange preview pane behavior

2004-04-20 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 20 April 2004 at 12:17 Terry said: > Upgraded to 2.10 the other day and have noticed some different > behaviour while scrolling through long messages in the preview pane. > if I attempt to click a link or select some > text, the message in that window moves back up to the beginning of th

Re: Vitual Folders

2004-04-17 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 18 April 2004 at 02:46 Peter Ouwehand said: AC>> I completely misunderstood what the Message Source AC>> filter was for - I assumed it was to do with where the message AC>> originated. Thinking about it logically though, why have that if AC>> you've already got a Sender filter? > Well, you

Re: Vitual Folders

2004-04-17 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 18 April 2004 at 01:35 Peter Ouwehand said: > I just tried a VF looking for @fractalz.net in the msg source. It showed > me 16 msgs. Thanks for that. I completely misunderstood what the Message Source filter was for - I assumed it was to do with where the message originated. Thinking abo

Re: Stop checking email when the network disappears

2004-04-17 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 17 April 2004 at 19:53 Mary Bull said: > Yes. And global across all accounts would be a useful option for other > account settings also. TB! is already so flexible and wonderful, but > it could definitely be made more so. Closely related to this, I feel it would be useful when creating a n

Re: Vitual Folders

2004-04-17 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 17 April 2004 at 22:31 Perry Nelson said: > You can group messages into the virtual folder by any filter you > choose. One thing that seems to be missing in the filters for virtual folders is you can't filter on a string. I use POPFile to classify my mail and after it was explained wha

Re:Vitual Folders

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 17 April 2004 at 02:01 rich gregory said: > Does anyone know if the failure of the TRASH to clean itself of old > messages has been fixed? Seems to work OK, but thenI hadn't noticed a problem with the previous version. I found one trash folder in one of my accounts that hadn't been set to

Vitual Folders

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi All I have just downloaded v2.1 and I see that it now has support for virtual folders - Great! erm... forgive me if I seem ignorant, but what are virtual folders, and how can I use them to enrich my life? The web site and help file are strangely quiet on the subject. -- Many Thanks Adam C

Re: POPFile (was Re:Bayesit plugin and filters executing order)

2004-04-07 Thread Adam Clarke
Hi On 07 April 2004 at 07:48 Allister Jenks said: > Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:44:29 AM, dAniel wrote: dh>> I for myself use POPFile, which uses the same approach (Bayesian) > I also used POPFile for quite a while, and I was very impressed with its > performance. What stopped me using it was