Re[2]: The Bat and Dual Monitors instability
Hello Steven, Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 8:56:57 AM, you wrote: admin, I also use TB (v2) on a multi-monitor (3) configuration. Do you have a physical 3 screens or virtual ? I tried on 2 physical screens, works fine. Since application have no idea that there are more than 1 screen. And since I use TB2, I doubt it will ever be fixed because I get a strong impression that v2 has been abandoned. RIT wants us to pay for v3 to get features we neither need nor want in order to get bug fixes to v2 that haven't even been implemented. Welcome to the real world (c) A black guy with a blue pills from a place that calls Matrix. -- Best regards, Ivanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: SpamPal or K9?
Hello Lynn, Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 5:57:59 PM, you wrote: IL Go to BayesIt home page and download the database from IL them. Load it up, and you will see the difference. It's worth a try ... thanks! Ummm .. I wrote that before I'd discovered that I can't find the home page. I went back through recent posts, but the only dl's I can find are at (or through) the ritlabs page ..? Plugin is written by Alexey Vinogradov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Information and updates at http://www.ritlabs.com/ru/solutions/BayesIt.php There is a good article about the filter. (Russian) Here is a direct link http://klirik.narod.ru/arc/spamdict.rar Back Up yours : spamdict.bye, spamdict.idx spamdict.lst from bayesit folder, extract downloaded file and replace this files files. Don't forget to shut down TheBat before doing it :) -- Best regards, Ivanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SpamPal or K9?
Hello Michael, Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 1:06:27 AM, you wrote: I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do others think? Most probable that it been taught badly. It doesn't meter which one program do you use, K9, POPFile, ... all of them have exactly the same logic. The big difference is how you teach your program. My suggestion, delete BayesIT database and teach it again, but do it carefully. 10-20 messages and 90% accuracy of filtering. A few hints, if you have subscribed to any mailing lists, don't mark messages as NOT Junk, put them in white list. White list and black list what you can and let the filter to deal with rest, works for 99.97% in a week. -- Best regards, Ivanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: SpamPal or K9?
Hello Lynn, Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 11:55:52 AM, you wrote: How would you deal with an account which has very little legit traffic, but seems to be a spam magnet? I have shifted some messages from other accounts and marked them 'not junk', when I remember, but it's not very convenient to have do that. The account gets no list mail. I doubt that moving messages and marking them as not junk would help. Analyze your good traffic and make sure that you didn't mark any good e-mail as junk, it would result bad sorting. It you are not sure, kill the bayes database and create a new one. (make a backup first !). Most of the problems that user's describe here is result of classifying mistakes, and when user switch to another application they tend to not make such mistakes or make a few, that doesn't screw the database. Go to BayesIt home page and download the database from them. Load it up, and you will see the difference. -- Best regards, Ivanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
