Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Leif, Sunday, January 30, 2005, 12:51:01 AM, you wrote: LG> Tagline of the day: LG> I took an IQ test and the results were negative. I am sure the test was faulty. But this would happen to many holders of driving licences. :-) - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ iQA/AwUBQfyVT97hKWb2ph+TEQIaVwCaA4PcKIa+XLvwqBWhyw/Q61fX0TsAn1Nh NCFf6rYyWYWQPARqdEDDFfNj =44lM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The actuality of starting using PGP
Hello Tony, Saturday, January 29, 2005, 9:13:29 PM, you wrote: TB> Unless you encrypt it and then no one will be able to read it without your TB> key. Not so. You do not need the sender's key to read an encrypted e-mail, because it will be encrypted to the recipient public key. The recipient only needs his own private key. -- Best regards, Joan Josep Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Spam reporting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ken, On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, at 20:36:41 [GMT -0800] (which was 13/12/2003 (D/M/Y) 5:36 where I live) you wrote: KS> Only two things work - the less effective one is using spam software KS> to filter your mail and then delete the spam after scanning the KS> titles/senders for real e-mails. As I posted before in the TBOT list, I find that it tends to work less, because spammers are learning to disguise the words. How does software identify words like pen1s, viag/ra and its unlimited variations, that all readers identify? - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP9rHx97hKWb2ph+TEQLt7gCfVSg3p3OBNR/tAUznjm69ga3FLIAAoJXa 9rGjsDlA4KY+odnzhE1B3P4S =1svN -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jonathan, On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, at 00:45:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 26/10/2003 (D/M/Y) 6:45 where I live) you wrote: JA> I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I JA> cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my sent folder, and not JA> sending any mail, when I try forcing a send of my own, it sends the JA> duplicates. However I cannot remove the duplicates (manually, or by JA> using kill dupes). So I'm reluctant to use TB at the moment :/ This comes in very handy when we people are waiting to decide to upgrade to v2 or not. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP5uHw97hKWb2ph+TEQL22ACfTAnGKcj9RKJ1fkhk75eJEak2mKMAn1fs chaf/g9QVG3mMTIqx5XEP9kt =SLuB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Integrate Bat witha PIM?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Chris, On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, at 18:38:41 [GMT -0400] (which was 14/10/2003 (D/M/Y) 0:38 where I live) you wrote: C> and is no C> longer being developed or sold Right. But it's free. And it's wonderful. My whole job is organised with it. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP47T697hKWb2ph+TEQInzQCg1IPl2RIYNhf5MJE6leYobgGUbXcAnR0x o4jE6i0SfHXsUvgi+R0uD0G4 =xIJv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.01 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Integrate Bat witha PIM?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Vishal, On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, at 12:20:28 [GMT -0400] (which was 12/10/2003 (D/M/Y) 18:20 where I live) you wrote: V> What I meant was that WinPIM can V> open up TB as I described above(so it can 'talk' to TB), but TB can't open up V> WinPIM because there is no 'registered PIM'. So I said it can't 'talk back'. Have you tried ECCO? It can open TB and receive information from TB. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA+AwUBP4sB397hKWb2ph+TEQIl3gCYs0yCIaLpeQ5iVlF/AueG01H/twCfbVwn U6yOn4KCYiFMfHFwoAoVmXo= =zgrL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Problem with AVG upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Quin, On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, at 12:13:04 [GMT -0600] (which was 15/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 20:13 where I live) you wrote: QS> I ran into problems on another computer when QS> trying to update by the method you first mentioned. It's much cleaner QS> and safer to use the AVG Control Center for updating. Just to round the thread off, I brought the thread to the TBOT list (as advised by Jamie Dainton) where the riddle was solved. I updated the AVG plug-in for TB from ftp://ftp.gin.cz/pub/mswindows/the_bat/plugins/antivirus/avgbat10us.exe and the problem was solved . No Grisoft trick at all, but their directions seem not to be complete. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP2yfW97hKWb2ph+TEQLQpQCguBdnIwqgV5R0nxyYCdje5P0X4j8An0mx dWaZX0puC0k85kMzBapo2thu =xVhW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: String search within results (to achieve Boolean AND)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, at 16:19:31 [GMT -0400] (which was 12/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 22:19 where I live) you wrote: DRA> How do other Batters store important notes? (If there is nothing to DRA> annotate. I send relevant notes for every program to a corresponding folder in the ECCO program using a feature called "The Shooter". - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP2NDLd7hKWb2ph+TEQIH+gCgwqIf8qNhtKziyPHfDR7HfwXKWjwAoKNl GuX8jJH3y24ok5v1U4svfz+9 =xgtX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Problem with AVG upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jamie, On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, at 17:16:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 13/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 18:16 where I live) you wrote: JD> Uninstall and reinstall it from fresh. I did. I uninstalled, downloaded the full AVG anew, I deleted the grisoft folder with the remaining files and reinstalled the new full 6.0.518 version (free). But nothing changed. The Control Center is not fully functional, and when I click on Activate a window appears saying that the installation is "damaged (modified)", and I have to OK it to close. But the program seems to be working, because it detected the eicar test string. When I start the computer and AVG is loaded, the same message (damaged) appears, and I have to click OK, which is a drag. Now I suspect that the program is not *damaged*, but that it is *modified*, and this is the normal behavior of the new version. Any idea about that? If this is really the case, is it a trick from Grisoft to push you into purchasing a paid version? Has their sense of how to conduct business been *damaged* ?. I hope not. Any information about this is welcome. An AV is a too important piece of soft to juggle with damaged programs. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP2NA497hKWb2ph+TEQL+wgCfQRumpQfrMYui8JIvt+CNXm+4YBcAnRIh EtmF32N05ZQqgQBhkXIMTDR1 =5duS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with AVG upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Joan, On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, at 09:25:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 13/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 9:25 where I live) you wrote: JJ> I informed Grisoft and asked for help since this seems to be a JJ> bug, although the free version is not entitled to technical JJ> support. Waiting for reply. Correction. I received an automated reply reminding me that there is no support, and sending me to their FAQ page. No much use. Meanwhile, deleting the new .bin file does not help. The program says it is damaged. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP2LBgN7hKWb2ph+TEQIO1QCgjMpEIb3GI4KZjSZTGnxTw/DB9ZQAn0fh tnf5M9g5ZC03endDLls45xoP =G3g7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with AVG upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi batters!, Although this is rather OT, I am sure it will interest many TB users. I have been using free AVG V6.0.515 for months. Excellent. But now I tried to update to V518 released last Sept 11, following Grisoft advise. http://www.grisoft.com I downloaded file d60330x3.bin to folder UPDATE and restarted AVG. The program updated itself, but the Control Center is inactive, and the icon does not appear in the system tray any longer. If I try to activate it, an error window opens informing that the program has been modified and it is damaged. It still checks virus, but without the Control Center the virus list cannot be updated. I informed Grisoft and asked for help since this seems to be a bug, although the free version is not entitled to technical support. Waiting for reply. What is now the best course of action? Reinstall the former version? Uninstall-install? Delete files? Wait and see? Any advice? Mine is be more cautious than me for updates. TIA - -- Best regards, Joan Josep Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP2K4Td7hKWb2ph+TEQKUlACfQCV+dZDVjo7uhcF0qV50Ss3vLXIAoIIQ aq15LR0ApTsTqM1irRSl/RsE =olGn -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Two thougths
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, at 19:28:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 08/09/2003 (D/M/Y) 20:28 where I live) you wrote: DB> I suspect you're seeing a disproportionate number of bug messages. It doesn't really matter, but a new version and 2 upgrades in one month, seems to me buggy, if I understood the messages correctly. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA+AwUBP1zKqt7hKWb2ph+TEQIEbgCVH1N8gEhiSoSAoSmhUzxMGYL9IACgmRYT O1gZy7jhGlhLg10D3/rG3bQ= =Hf2o -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Two thougths
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi batters!, I am anxiously following the group discussions to decide if, and when, to upgrade to v2, and two questions come to my mind: USD 17 for this excellent soft deserve that many mails in a thread? The release of v2 seems premature. Should the name be changed to The Bug? - -- Best regards, Joan Josep Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBP1yzS97hKWb2ph+TEQKqIQCghn4fcXyt/UFCZ1hK9cA7swjOhxgAnA8E KSx3OcT0sZSYB60N4Dc7fXTZ =k0OM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, at 10:28:12 [GMT +0700] (which was 18/03/2003 (D/M/Y) 4:28 where I live) you wrote: TF> so that TF> this dot-asterisk is interpreted as "any characters" I do not see the need of .* If tbudl is present, it is, whatever is around. I use tbudl as a filterinf string, and it works fine. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBPnd7U97hKWb2ph+TEQL7ywCfVPkRBSUGFlG2bQLBkEjgJv5cD0wAnRpD hdyJLHRjazbekDd9D3uOhcXx =pX7v -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: the bat! freezes when trying to compress/purge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Fiber, On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, at 17:44:12 [GMT -0500] (which was 26/02/2003 (D/M/Y) 23:44 where I live) you wrote: F> So I played it smart and first F> exported all messages concerned by the future deletion to another F> place. Then I deleted the .TBB and .TBI files. Relaunched The Bat!, F> re-imported the messages Surprisingly, I had recently the same problem. I had never had it before, but TB crashed when compressing the Inbox of one of my accounts. I had version 1.61, upgraded to 1.62i, but didn't work. It happened after some HDD problems, so the files might be corrupted, although they still could be used by other soft like Mailbag Assistant. Finally I received your postings, and the procedure above worked fine. So thanks. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBPmD+b97hKWb2ph+TEQJpjQCgo1FXd2eoo8C4AGjN6mnkAujuwGcAoIVn my7jPoLejoiZ4xeIba/yRFCZ =vZHf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Retrieving Hotmail in The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Granville, On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, at 10:00:16 [GMT +] (which was 07/01/2003 (D/M/Y) 11:00 where I live) you wrote: GC> suitable programme for GC> retrieving Hotmail into The Bat! I am using Hotmail Pop 1.0 from www.boolean.ca. It works OK AFAIK, and its free. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBPhqoWt7hKWb2ph+TEQLzhQCeIMwXBrYbOBpXsVMyHQ41t+E5C18AoJD1 HdYj7ozPqLo7tOrpjnBUkohJ =fvkt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: How good is Panda Antivirus??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jason, On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, at 08:15:34 [GMT +0800] (which was 10/11/2002 (D/M/Y) 1:15 where I live) you wrote: J> anyone of u here using it?? I am no IT expert, but can tell you that my company (800 employees) switched from McAfee to Panda. AFAIK our experts are pleased. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBPc4OEd7hKWb2ph+TEQIhZACfS+Dx7X3Yfcrm5twVq4/j8qzbHxMAnRll 8N8CfHef74kKhQGEbvkJj/kj =eFP0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The Bat and Hotmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Raj, On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 21:40:21 [GMT +0530] (which was 23/09/2002 (D/M/Y) 17:10 where I live) you wrote: R> I just installed web2pop and find it very convenient...Works well with both R> Yahoo & Hotmail. I have just installed it too. It works well with hotmail, but I have been unable to connect to netscape mail so far. The English documentation says that it is supported, and that you need the netscape module. But in the modules list this one is not listed. In the French side of the webpage you can read that this module is actually the aol module. I downloaded and installed it, but still it did not work, although the reported error is different. Now there seems to be a connection, but something fails. I tried to use both the @ and the # sign as directed. I have written to the author and wait. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08 Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93 iQA/AwUBPZWh1N7hKWb2ph+TEQJlTQCcDLEK6eLPsjRIm4OPbm1araQkLgYAnRoN v23Oec/d4HSlK9G6GR6EI5mD =UI2j -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: global option for smtp server
Hello Tomas, On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 20:50:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 23/09/2002 (D/M/Y) 19:50 where I live) you wrote: T> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server, T> is there a way to setup one default smtp server for all T> accounts, not only on per account basis? You have the possibility of using a different pop server for each account for the incoming mail, but one single smtp server for all of them for the outgoing mail. Only drawback I know is that you may be revealing this e-mail address to unwanted correspondents, if this matters. -- Best regards, Joan Josep Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Missing folders
Hi Batters!, I have been trying to upgrade my computer system, and I have found that carrying on the Bat is rather complicated, at least for me. I followed the procedure described in the FAQ page, but probably did some mistake. First I upgraded from win98 to win2k in a 2G disk, reformatting the HD. I succeeded. But then I bought a new computer with a 20G disk, and the installation in this machine has not been fully successful. I have 3 accounts. The 2 secondary accounts whose mail files are located in subdirectories with more than 700 messages have been transferred OK. This includes the present account with the Bat folder. But I have been unable to transfer correctly the main account. The new install has only the 5 basic folders( In, out, in known, sent and trash), but the other created folders with their messages have disappeared. Is there a simple method to recover the folders and messages in this folder, or should I better start it all over. Searching former postings I realize that it may be tricky. Any advise would be appreciated. -- Greetings, Joan Josep Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Another filter not working
Hi batters!, I am referring to a recent thread started by Roman Katzer, because I have a similar problem. I have defined several filters that distribute the incoming mail to different boxes. They work fine. So far so good. Now I define another similar filter, intended to transfer messages from the Outbox to the analogous box in another account, from where they will be sent. The rule is "@ is anywhere". This is the only filter in the Outgoing mail. I write a new message, a reply for instance, and store with the second icon from left. But messages remain in the working account and are not moved to the new account. What is wrong here? Any help?. TIA -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[3]: Ability to edit new email
Hello Gary, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 13:27:53 [GMT -0600] (which was 31/10/2001 (D/M/Y) 20:27 where I live) you wrote: G> Today's thought: How do you tell when you run out of invisible ink? Today's solution: When you first open the bottle add a piece of wood, cork, porexpan, etc. When the floater lands, start a new bottle. The solution fails if the ink is invisible and weightless. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: %IF with %TIME
Hello Nick, On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, at 10:34:41 [GMT -0700] (which was 22/10/2001 (D/M/Y) 19:34 where I live) you wrote: NA> Through Control Panel, I see no menu NA> item that allows showing time in the 24 hour format, I think it is set automatically selecting the country in Control Panel/Regional Configuration -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Virus
Hello syv, On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, at 15:26:26 [GMT -0700] (which was 06/09/2001 (D/M/Y) 0:26 where I live) you wrote: s> I have TB 1.54d. I use Computer Associates InoculeIT v5. I just s> updated today the definition and run a full scan and I get: s> InoculateIT real-time protection has found that c:\sys\thebat.exe is s> infected with Win32.Magistr.29188 virus. I updated InoculateIT PE today, and it finds no virus in TB 1,53d -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Re: *Severe* bug in IntPack
Hello Chema, On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, at 23:38:00 [GMT +0200] (which was 01/09/2001 (D/M/Y) 23:38 where I live) you wrote: CB> I think it is a *severe* bug and must be fixed *immediately* CB> You can accidentally delete an important folder I reported this bug long ago, but it has not been corrected. I do not trust the Spanish version so I switched back to English. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: When Did This Start?
Hello Jason, On Mon, 21 May 2001, at 15:49:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 21/05/2001 (D/M/Y) 21:49 where I live) you wrote: >> All of a sudden I now see that TB! amends any line starting with "from" by putting a >>> in front of it. I've never noticed that before, and so now I >> have to use the dash-escape feature of both PGP and GPG to dash-escape >> that line. This is what I mean: >>>From here on in... This line should have > in front of it now. >> Has this always been the case with TB? Perhaps I've never typed any >> sentences beginning with "From"? ;o) Let me insist. When I receive Jason's mail, "From" has received a > sign in your system, so the line has 3 >, while the remainder lines have just 2 >. But my system adds no additional >. Not in my former message (quoting Nick)nor in the quoted message (quoting Jason). I guess that the additional sign is added at reception time, not when sending. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[3]: When Did This Start?
Hello Jason, On Mon, 21 May 2001, at 16:03:15 [GMT -0400] (which was 21/05/2001 (D/M/Y) 22:03 where I live) you wrote: JE> So TB is inserting this at send, but it JE> is not inserting it as you type. No, unless TB! is smart enough to delete it in my comp. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: When Did This Start?
Hello Nick, On Mon, 21 May 2001, at 12:41:16 [GMT -0700] (which was 21/05/2001 (D/M/Y) 21:41 where I live) you wrote: NA> From here on in... This line should have > in front of it now. It hasn't in my screen. It appears only in the quotation,not in the original mail -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TBC: minor bug with the Account Log
Hello Devid, On Tue, 15 May 2001, at 20:07:43 [GMT +0200] (which was 15/05/2001 (D/M/Y) 20:07 where I live) you wrote: DV> * tap SHIFT-CTRL-A twice The second tap does not produce any effect, so I can just close one log window and no error is produced. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Nice formatting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi batters!, I see that most messages in this list are neatly formatted, but mine do not. Why do my messages look so awful? I have checked all the options in the "options, editor preferences, general, text" block. Word wrap is set at 70, and PGP word wrap at 68. Any help? TIA - -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBOtCjwA1dheHKjKWlAQE8RAQAt8/kBj8hgS6g8LD9y1keZCxsv15+5hYX mYY8v4hrqrgm20G9XLPsXFMJzawA9WxypSYe1DWRr/mwPG1QzwKV5PCS5meiw1bn lSxOfMhCh8ZC/LGJ8qip+N4PLueHkXEAdnJC5tEEgGjN/hb7/P1BkqiJiU1SJU72 9E+esK5FadU= =tyDm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re[2]: Another time macro mistake!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ming-Li, On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, at 08:18:35 [GMT -0700] (which was 07/04/2001 (D/M/Y) 17:18 where I live) you wrote: ML> "on Tuesday, 2 Apr 2001 at 18:34:57 GMT -0700 (PDT) (which was Mon, ML> April 03, 2001 03:34 where I live)" I now see that Tuesday and Mon have just been exchanged. Do not take me for punctillious, rather that I am beginning to understand regex, that still looks to me like a bird pecking on my keyboard, and the exchange confused me. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBOtCZ5A1dheHKjKWlAQF+GgP+OybvaYdXVPchawhVIL/ES5OWlCPF0T5V wtB+sv5CIiTceL+ow+HjhfOq+jryrxNEiejjaIVxIdRryb2JktX0P/W9f0hu9uU7 QHBlECMlh1u0y3GmRiKaXbeOxtmFPv6kbJu6uDvnvmvMA3Ob4yxJjYj0l+eXORik Vak7ijNoPCU= =X09V -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re[2]: Another time macro mistake!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ming-Li, On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, at 08:18:35 [GMT -0700] (which was 17:18 where I live) you wrote: ML> IOW, the ML> correct outcome should be: ML> "on Tuesday, 2 Apr 2001 at 18:34:57 GMT -0700 (PDT) (which was Mon, ML> April 03, 2001 03:34 where I live)" Since I am also interested in the argument, and the statement is obviously wrong, could you please review it and advise accordingly ? Thanks for your kind help. - -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBOtAOWg1dheHKjKWlAQHrVgQAqGd6hGF4TJs5I2LP+kxslTSfpUuQIwri q4mJ/HOSUUvAYTs+l0Y7AehbHwjh7PAD8F1AbEQmADg/Vqtdygwnk26Vy6y3IzLj mfmezo+vggz5nlaqer3KfdnJxo6dLPxao4RQucQ0x34FdQDY8wjYMcODJn9FJslb 2ntNQj//lq0= =H2dR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re[2]: Invalid keys
Hello Brian, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 17:12:50 [GMT -0500] (which was 0:12 where I live) you wrote: >> This is entirely a PGP issue. TB! doesn't control the output of a key >> verification, it simply asks PGP to do it's work. You are right. This is entirely a PGP issue. The message should have been posted there. Which I just have done. Sorry. -- Best regards, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: PGP encryption
Hello Joan, On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, at 14:26:19 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:26 where I live) you wrote: JJ> How can I make TB recognize these keypair? JJ> Should I uninstall and start everything over? JJ> Any exit from this labirynth? JJ> I lifesaver from the experts would be greatly appreciated. OK, guys. After a hole morning of muddling things, and thanks to Mark's advice in another thread -Using PGP for encryption- (* There is a really good discussion list for PGP beginners which is called PGP-Basics. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a quick link for subscribing to that list. *), I learned the difference between the Bat and PGPtray, and I am walking again. SO NO NEED OF RESPONSE BY NOW. I am rushing to read the remaining 4000 messages in PGP-basics. -- Best regards, Joan Josepmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
PGP encryption
Hi batters!, I am a newbie trying to climb the steep learning curve of TB. Trying tp follow the TB help instructions and this NG, I installed version 7 of PGP, uninstalled it, installed version 6.5.8, created a key ring and even succeded in sending myself, to a second e-mail account, a locked message, and then unlocking the received mail. Now, when I try to go ahead and import a key following the directions in another TB thread, TB tells me that I have to create a key first. I cannot even lock a new message as I did before. After all this experimenting, I finished with a key ring in a directory Network Associates\PGP\PGP Keyrings. This contains the files pubring.pkr, secring.skr, and four backups (1 to 4) of each file. According to PGPKeys, the key pair expires next year. How can I make TB recognize these keypair? Should I uninstall and start everything over? Any exit from this labirynth? I lifesaver from the experts would be greatly appreciated. -- Greetings, Joan Josep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
