Re[2]: Sent mail going to Inbox instead of Sent folder...
Hello MFPA, Sunday, October 26, 2008, 1:27:47 AM, you wrote: Unless you have filters set up that are causing this behaviour, either you are seeing the mail you sent appear in your inbox after the group sends it back out or else something very odd is happening. Gmail behaves that way if you use POP access. For better results one needs to use IMAP and keep all folders synchronised. Then the right mails go to the right place. If you use a Gmail account in TB with POP access and use Gmail's SMTP to send mail, then the mail will not come in the Inbox when you check mail. But if you use web interface to send mail, then on next mail check in TB, the sent mail will appear as new mail in your inbox. Its a little queer way that Gmail works. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Gmail connection problem
Hello Chrille, Saturday, October 11, 2008, 11:36:16 AM, you wrote: I use POP. And all I've done is to follow the settings I got from Gmail that can be found here: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=32231 I've had those settings since July, and haven't changed anything since then. But now it just won't work. Well I have a slightly different setup and it works fine. You could try it out. The following are the differences/highlights: 1. SMTP server port is 587 2. SMTP Connection is STARTTLS instead of TLS 3. SMTP Auth settings, pop before SMTP is unchecked. 4. POP port remains 995 with TLS connection. 5. Make sure POP auth button says regular and not one of the other 4 types. Works fine here with these settings. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail connection problem
Hello Chrille, Friday, October 10, 2008, 8:59:34 PM, you wrote: I've had TheBat! set up for my Gmail-account a long time now, but all of a sudden I can't download any messages from it, but I can send emails from it. Perhaps I should mention that I haven't changed any settings in TheBat! And I'm able to manually log in to my gmail-account to read messages. Are you using POP or IMAP? What server settings do you have in there? -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
Hello MAU, Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:05:06 PM, you wrote: If consciously (or not) you have set Standard toolbar to use menu icons and then (or before) you set all toolbars to menu icons in the Options tab, when you remove this option (what I called 'global' option) the specific setting for Standard toolbar still remains set to menu icons. There is no bug. I applied the change globally. Standard toobar was using normal toolbar icons and not menu icons. So its not like it reverted to my previous setting to a specific toolbar. That is why I called it minor bug. If I apply a change globally and something gets altered by it, undoing the change globally should undo that too. Just my 2 cents. As long as it got solved I am happy. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
Hello, I am using 4.0.34 and in Toolbar customisation, Options tab, selected to use Menu icons for all toolbars. This as expected made the icons small sized, using the menu icons. Though the setting is fine, the problem is that unchecking this selection does not restore the icon set to the larger icons previously used in the Main window. New message window gets larger icons but mail window continues to show the small icon set. I don't mind current setting. Its just an irritant when things cannot be undone. Any solutions? -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply/macro/filter issue
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:03:25 AM, you wrote: So, I either need to amend the salutation manually or go into the addressbook to remove the duplicate entry for Paul (it's duplicate as the email address is always the same, just the way it appears changes with the various prefixes). How can the following three email addresses be called same: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To me they look like three distinct email addresses. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Mail tracking
Hello Bill, Thursday, May 22, 2008, 11:38:48 AM, you wrote: I believe that TB v3, that you seem to be using, will *not* load content. However, I believe that TB v4 is able to load such content. This is why I am not about to upgrade! The primary reason I started using TB was the fact that I could download and read ANY email without worrying about Trojans, viruses or web tracking bugs. But TB4 will load such party from websites only if told to do so not by default so it's as safe as TB 3 unless one decides to make it less so. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB yahoo acount
Hello Luc, Thursday, April 17, 2008, 10:09:32 PM, you wrote: Yeah, strange huh? I switched from provider a month ago and until a few days i could use yahoo's smtp ... suddenly it stopped and now using my providers smtp it works Yahoo is globally offering pop and SMTP only to paid users. If you pay you MUST be able to send mail from their SMTP unless your ISP blocks the concerned port. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB yahoo acount
Hello Luc, Friday, April 18, 2008, 12:02:13 AM, you wrote: the uk domain still offers it for free as far as i know In that case this page has the required information: http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/mail/original/manage/pop-06.html -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: How to streamline and automate TB?
Hello Michael, Friday, April 11, 2008, 9:45:29 AM, you wrote: Could you suggest a free IMAP provider to test it out with TB? Last time I tried it was pretty flaky. Gmail has IMAP support and is free. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello David, Monday, March 3, 2008, 1:24:18 PM, you wrote: The way to get around it is either. 1) Create a Sent filter which copiees the message back in to your inbox (or where ever you keep the list messages. or 2) Use a different SMTP service. or (from my experience with Gmail) 3) Use IMAP access to Gmail instead of POP3 -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Problem sending Email
Hello Teresa, Thursday, February 28, 2008, 2:28:55 AM, you wrote: I use AVG Free and haven't reconfigured it in any way. To add to the mystery, a test message I sent to my husband, who uses the same ISP, went through. So I sent another test message to myself, and it DIDN'T go through. Weirder and weirder. IIRC AVG by default installs the virus scanner to scan incoming and outgoing mail. So u don't have to reconfigure it. In fact I had unchecked the Check outgoing mail option back when I was using AVG. You could try doing the same. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Turning off 'delete below sig delimiter' feature
Hello Grumpy, Sunday, February 24, 2008, 1:29:21 PM, you wrote: Hi everyone, Is there a setting in The Bat where you can disable the 'delete everything below the last signature delimiter when replying' feature? I can remove the sig delimiter from my messages, and that will help - but it won't help when other people use them (The Bat will still see the delimiter and will delete the stuff below it when you reply to a message). When you reply to someone, how is it helpful to keep all text below *his* sig delimiter in your reply? Just a query that occurs to me. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: New, Reply Format
Hello Tim, Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 8:34:44 PM, you wrote: And this strange phenomenon shows up regardless if I create a new message, reply to one or just simply view your message as it sits in my inbox. How do I get the text to all look the same. Maybe a picture will speak a few more words. Go into Tools Preferences Message Viewer/Editor and set the font for Signature text to be same as for regular text. See the image here: http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/991/27053965or6.jpg -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: New, Reply Format
Hello Tim, Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 9:07:05 AM, you wrote: Hello Roelof, Not sure what you are referring to? Like this message here. I'm typing in plain text but everything below what I'm typing is in HTML and grayed out, and that goes to when I Reply as well. I have not changed any of my settings. All I did was upgrade to the newest version and the newer version changed something which I can't figure out. And why does it always say Latin 9 (ISO) at the bottom? Every time I do a new message or reply it changes it defaults to Latin. Bizarre. As pointed out by Roelof Otten, the problem is in your reply template I feel. Right click Account and in properties go to Templates. In reply template see that: %Quotes is ABOVE the signature delimiter. In your case it seems to have slipped below the signature delimter. I see your posts and in all of them the previous post is quoted as part of signature. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Upgrade to v4.0.11?
Hello Greg, Sunday, February 10, 2008, 9:23:06 AM, you wrote: Hello Robin, On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:30:48 +1100 GMT(2/9/2008, 8:30 PM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Robin Anson wrote: RA If you had a licensed copy of v3.x, it is still good for V4.0.x. There RA is no need for a separate licence. Where is this policy stated? If this is the case since I already purchased the upgrade license, can I get a refund??? :( This plicy only applies if you purchased TB version 3.xx AFTER November 20, 2007. See if it applies to your case. See if it applies to you. If it does, you might try for a refund. No idea if they will really grant it. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.0.22 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?
Hello Tom, Saturday, February 9, 2008, 8:31:35 AM, you wrote: Have not had any problems with 3.99.29 The *one* grouse I had with 3.99.29 was the compose message window where on attaching files I could not see the panel on the left that showed attach files. The promised they would fix it in next version and they have :) IIRC this afflicted all 3.99 series. Can't remember which prior version did not have this bug though. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.0.22 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Attachments not showing in Edit Mail Message window
Hello Roger, Sunday, December 2, 2007, 6:18:58 PM, you wrote: I have checked back through the TBBeta mail and cannot find any reference to your problem, however if someone said it is due to be fixed in version 4.0 then you will have to hope it appeatrs soon! We have not had any correspondence from Maxim, the main developer, for about a month. I suspect the problem may be related to Vista only. No it is not. I have it on XP SP2 as well. It was answeerd here on list as well as on Ritlab forums.: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=5368 -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Attachments not showing in Edit Mail Message window
Hello Jarle, Friday, November 30, 2007, 11:48:33 PM, you wrote: The pane showing attached files is not displayed when I start a new message and attach a file. How can I fix this? I asked this a few days ago. Was told it will be fixed in next version. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TheBat! Version 4
Hello John, Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 3:06:04 AM, you wrote: Try Linux KDE PIM. Everything and more that you possibly need as well as Palm integration. I think that the Gnome interface may also have a similar feature from Novell as well, but I like the KDE interface better, YMMV. Also Open Office seamless, and free! If serious about this, I suggest Suse 10.3. Very stable and user friendly. On Windows one could try Thunderbird and install the 'Lightning' Extension to get the Calendar/PIM. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 2 Issues
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 7:17:00 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, Options / Preferences / Applications. There is a tickmark for checking at startup whether TB! is associated with VCF files. Did you see that? I did check that. TB is just not satisfied unless all three files are registered to it. I'll ignore this for time being. My other issue is more vexing. Read below please. An attachments pane should open when you attach the first file. In the main window (not in the editor), check out the setting under: View / Attachmments/ Hide to Pane. This is the setting I use. But in new message window, even after attaching files, the attachment pane just does not appear. That is what troubles me. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP file deletion
Thursday, August 9, 2007, 5:45:01 PM, you wrote: Hi, I'm a POP3 kind of guy, but I have one account that I can only access through IMAP. There is something I am not getting about IMAP, though. When I delete a file, it just turns red and sits there. No amount of synchronizing or double-deleting will make it disappear, it is like the living-dead, it can't be killed! What do I need to do make IMAP messages go away via TheBat!, rather than logging on to the web interface? Is PURGE what you are looking for? -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: how to remove history/suggestions for email favourites?
Hello Tom, Sunday, June 3, 2007, 8:01:23 AM, you wrote: Hello Everyone, still trying to work out my isuses with macros and templates for some of my regular contacts. One of the issues I encoutered is that when I enter the name of the contact in the To: field, TB is bringing up previous addresses used. Others have already mentioned how to modify the behavior. Just as a mention, the history of the previously used email address is in the account.his file in the folder of that account. You can open it in Notepad and see and edit. -- Best regards, Meanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: How to type Euro symbol in The Bat!
Hello Jernej, Thursday, May 24, 2007, 1:20:07 AM, you wrote: On Wednesday, May 23, 2007, 21:24:14, Mean Drake wrote: http://img14.imgspot.com/u/07/142/15/TB.JPG http://img14.imgspot.com/u/07/142/16/TB2.JPG Can you post the headers of those messages (and also, are you viewing this on the same machine)? I've seen TB display Arabic fine, though I've heard that the Indic scripts are quite a challenge to get right. I am posting headers but am just masking out some email addresses as these belong to friends who might not want them in a a searchable archive. And yes, the screens are all on same machine. The headers of the first screen. This is where I click on the email field to get it to display properly. Till then it won't: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from amutka.pair.com (amutka.pair.com [209.68.3.220]) by mail.nerdshack.com with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:21:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 27301 invoked by uid 800); 27 Apr 2007 13:21:20 - Resent-Date: 27 Apr 2007 13:21:20 - Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 27 09:21:19 2007 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YF6JMQspHfKdCoHMXKgEpMlkhyEMfPN8RdqVqQanvnXr2yRQVLXiOrjxWrA7nlG6q7IiZ9AWIHFbq/VkVsh3jn5eICEIoyoEQ50MLA41qNtLDFtMVIErqxUJW8+Jb4yGbxQkqru/nN1sp3AsAJBKhWB1Vto1z+nojV7GLBVF4/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CqoTT14dXilsdHrSykOtOtYJjWu9rw9HP7LnJ0tzH/N5cucCglbyKjZ9sLDrZ5FNPcigv0bWwu7HlKmGNgxYLI7FnGMDGCHeCssw83hzO5TmsAXocJcroXc+zx2RsO83IjGTbSt96GzCS+z+/6g0f2jyNfw2Ysr2cxj+UnxlsSE= Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:51:17 +0530 From: =?UTF-8?B?RHIgVGFoZXIgICjgpKHgpL7gpbAg?= =?UTF-8?B?4KSk4KS+4KS54KWH4KSwIOCkleCkvuCkl+CksuCkteCkvuCksuCkvik=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nukkad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: Re[2]: [nukkad] unnecesary progs staring after booting In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Disposition: inline References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive/latest/50153 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Mumbai Central Headers of second screen which has the Unicode in body of message and never displays well: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.server (203.199.86.58.static.vsnl.net.in [203.199.86.58]) by mail.nerdshack.com with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 May 2007 14:19:32 -0500 Received: from 202.177.236.58 ([10.20.30.254]) by mail.server.com (mailserver [10.10.10.10]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R) with ESMTP id 37-md5003383.tmp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 May 2007 00:46:39 +0530 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:48:23 +0530 From: Mean Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SPAM: [Fwd: Re: [nukkad] unnecesary progs staring after booting] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=030809060504050102090400 X-Spam-Processed: mailserver, Thu, 24 May 2007 00:46:39 +0530 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 10.20.30.254 X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Purging with IMAP
Hello, Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB 3.0. What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do not get purged. How do I purge all messages on server using TB? -- Best regards, Mean mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Purging with IMAP
Hello Joe, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:38:15 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, Monday, September 27, 2004, 4:57:29 PM, you wrote: Hello, Somehow I think there is a problem with IMAP folders. Using TB 3.0. What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do not get purged. How do I purge all messages on server using TB? Check -- Accounts -- properties -- mail management - Make sure message management is set to delete messages from server after removed from trash. I think Kevin's solution will aply here. The setting you mention is not present in TB 3.0. The FolderPurge+Compress seems to be the way to go though but I must agree it is not that intuitive. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Purging with IMAP
Hello Tim, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 3:01:20 AM, you wrote: On Tuesday, 28 September 2004, Mean Drake wrote: MD What happens is that the messages that I delete locally move to MD trash but even though I empty trash, the messages on server do MD not get purged. How do I purge all messages on server using TB? Account Properties Mail Management IMAP Fine-Tune -- Compress folders when switching to another folder. This doesn't Purge. As I mentioned, only FolderCompress+Purge as suggested by Kevin seems to work. -- Best regards, Meanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Purging with IMAP
Hello Tim, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 4:11:11 AM, you wrote: Can someone give me a reminder on terminology? What's compressing, and what's purging (on IMAP)? The setting I described removes deleted messages from the server in my setup -- is that purging or compressing? Compressing reclaims space space locally and makes folder easier to read for TB by removing the dead space of already deleted mails from folders. Purging on IMAP will permanently delete emails in the inbox on server that have been marked for deletion. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Purging with IMAP
Hello Kevin, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:08:56 AM, you wrote: Hi Mean Drake - On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 04:25:12 [GMT +0530] (which was 3:55 PM where I live) you wrote: Compressing reclaims space space locally and makes folder easier to read for TB by removing the dead space of already deleted mails from folders. Purging on IMAP will permanently delete emails in the inbox on server that have been marked for deletion. This is incorrect. Allie is correct in his description. Sorry for the confusion guys. But last might Compress was just not deleting the marked messages from web based interface. But of course it was night time :-) -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: OT : How to setup a GMail account with The Bat!
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 5:13:59 PM, you wrote: Hello Kevin, Sunday, September 26, 2004, 1:41:48 AM, you wrote: KC The default installation file should include the gmail.lua. It's been KC working well over here and is much handier than having to use the KC Gmail web interface. I didn't realize the default included gmail, so I downloaded it separately. works nice! I'm still playing around with the web interface, to setup filters and learn searches.. As I said before, GMail is different from all other web based mails like Yahoo and Hotmail. If you are going to get a GPopper type of utility you might as well not use GMail and use some other free pop email service. -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT : How to setup a GMail account with The Bat!
Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:00:48 AM, you wrote: Hi Tbudler, I know that it is a bit off-topic but I really would like to know how to setup a Google Mail account in the Bat! So if someone has already done this, could it give me the way to accomplish this ? I could find some info here: http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=169789st=0 Well even if it is possible, it beats the purpose of having a GMail account. The GMail account as features in its web based interface which you will not be able to use at all. Why not just sign up for another free POP3 account. Or is it somewhat of a status symbol to have @Gamil.com address ;-) -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Message Filters
Thursday, September 23, 2004, 6:35:01 PM, you wrote: Hello Mean, On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:45:09 +0530 GMT (23/09/2004, 02:15 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: MD Selective download filter. MD Condition: Message size greater than 800KB MD Action Kill. I have one of those, with a limit of 50KB. Works fine. MD Still doesn't work. I am an a mailing list where people keep sending MD attachments of over 3-5 MB and I need to delete these on server so MD they don't get downloaded. Am I doing something wrong? Which TB version are you using? Version 3.0 -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Message Filters
Hello, Selective download filter. Condition: Message size greater than 800KB Action Kill. Still doesn't work. I am an a mailing list where people keep sending attachments of over 3-5 MB and I need to delete these on server so they don't get downloaded. Am I doing something wrong? -- Best regards, Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Filters
I have a small problems with filters. I want to delete mails over 1 MB in size on server WITHOUT downloading them. I have set a filter for the same and the action set is to delete it from server. But if I watch my internet usage, The Bat! seems to download the entire message and then delete it totally. This is counterproductive as I neither see the mail nor save my bandwidth usage. I would like to see this filter work. Any suggestions please? -- Best regards, Mean mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Sorry...correction about filter
Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7 MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did not work at all. Filter is setup as: Message size Greater than 800KB Action Delete Message from server, and play a sound I got the sound and still the message is in my inbox...not deleted from server. -- Best regards, Mean mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sorry...correction about filter
Saturday, September 18, 2004, 1:18:08 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, -- Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:28:39 PM, you wrote: Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7 MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did not work at all. Filter is setup as: Message size Greater than 800KB Action Delete Message from server, and play a sound I got the sound and still the message is in my inbox...not deleted from server. Is the filter under Selective Download??? No its under incoming messages. Should it be under selective download...I think I see the Point. I'll keep it under there. -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Glyphs
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:31:19 PM, you wrote: Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:43:12 AM, you wrote: L Didn't change the name. glyphs.bmp ... Oh rats! found it ... I was half asleep last night probably ... the filename had a number attached to it. Thanks! Lynn Could someone send a glyphs.bmp file offlist. Would like to know its layout and try to make a few of my own. -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[5]: Glyphs
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:48:24 PM, you wrote: Hello Mean, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:27:00 PM, you wrote: MD Could someone send a glyphs.bmp file offlist. Would like to know its MD layout and try to make a few of my own. You can find a few here: http://bat-mail.de.vu/tools.html http://www.thebatworld.de/system/sections/index.php?op=listarticlessecid=10 http://www.thebat.cz/ikony.htm Got themthanks a lotBack to Lurk mode!!! -- Mean http://www.meandrake.tk Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Proxy servers
today my Internet Access has been changed from DialUp to rasPPPOE using a Ethernet Card and I need to use a proxy server. My Internet Explorer.Connection settings work fine and I can browse effortlessly but The Bat! does not connect to any pop server. Is it a matter of configuring TB! to use the proxy server. Should it not detect network settings as configured for Internet Explorer. (OE fails to retrieve mail too even though it shares proxy settings with IE). Any help is appreciated. PS: Once this is solved I'll need to look into getting my FTP client to Work. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Proxy servers
Sunday, June 29, 2003, 5:00:18 AM, you wrote: It sounds like you've not configured your network correctly. The proxy settings are typically for HTTP (and FTP). It's not used for mail. I presume you're using xDSL or cable and have a modem router with it's own IP. If this doesn't run DHCP you may need to set this as your default gateway in the network settings dialogue. Thank everybody. Got things to work after all. Put in DNS servers manually instead of auto-detect and configured default gateway and things are up and running. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Delete from server
Monday, February 24, 2003, 1:01:44 PM, you wrote: Hello Mean, On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:58:28 +0530 GMT (24/02/03, 13:28 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: Does TB have the capacity to create a filter that will check for the filter conditions and if met delete the message from server. Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download / New... and try the Kill option under the Advanced tab. However, I don't use this, for two reasons: 2.) A message killed on (i.e. deleted from) the server is gone. If there is a mistake in your filtering string, you will never know. Therefore, if you download all messages and put those meeting the filter criteria into a special folder which you can review at a later time, you might catch false positives. Thanks Jonathan and Thomas. My filter criteria have been checked over time...Just wanted to know where to get this part done. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Change of ISP.
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 4:35:33 AM, you wrote: You could run your own SMTP server. I could do, but I don't really want the added complications. What comlications? My ISP only allows outgoing mails to go out from accounts with Email address of my ISP. My Own mailserver running in the backround lets me send emails out from all 10 accounts. No complications. Takes just a few minuts to setup. Only make it secure so spammers don't find a relay for their purposes. I set it to use port a different port from the default of 25 and also use SMTP authentication. -- Mean. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Upgrading OS, adding a drive and downloading the latest Bat.
Friday, December 6, 2002, 4:54:25 AM, you wrote: FWIW, I recently ran into all sorts of problems with that approach. In my case, I attempted to dual-boot NT4 and Windows 2000, installing Windows 2000 to drive D: with an existing NT4 installation on C: After installing Windows 2000, NT4 would no longer boot (even in VGA mode) and I lost all the applications and settings previously on that computer. Worse, my backup software doesn't work with Windows 2000 -- so I effectively also lost all my backups too. But Dual booting Windows 2000 and 98 is a cinch. A child could do it. I do believe the issues of dual booting 2K and NT4 do not apply to 98 and Win2k as long as drives are not changed to NTFS partitions. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bounce Mail
- Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Bounce Mail Hello Mean, On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 4:56:49 AM you [MD] wrote (at least in part): First a small thanks for an exhaustive review of bouncing from a postmaster's point of view. Definitely yes! RFCs not only recommend, but require postmaster@ being a active and read address per domain. What about [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also since I run my own SMTP server, none of my bounced mails are ever going to reach my ISPs postmaster or MAILER-DAEMON email account. In that case this should not bother tham should it. I'm sorry for being forced to disillusionate you, but this faking bounces ain't fighting spam even in the slightest way. It has nothing in common with any successful spam fighting technology, the effect of bounces and faked bounces on amount of spam is near to zero, not measurable. If you want flexibility in fighting spam make use of RBLs and systems like SpamAssassin (like!!! there might be others that work in a similar fashion. I don't want to break it down on SA being the one!). I couldn't agree more with you here. But where I stay, I am sorry to say the spammers are not professional at all and bouncing messages works very well for me. Its recently that I have become lazier and do not use mailwasher that spam has started getting back to me. So what works for me is something that I was looking ways to implement which started my query of whether it was possible to do it using TB. -- Mean. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bounce Mail
- Original Message - From: Simon Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:50 PM Subject: Re: Bounce Mail Perhaps the people tugging at their locks over the idea of Mailwasher bouncing messages should grab a copy, being as it is free, and investigate before throwing tantrums about how much work it causes everyone. No one here on this list has said that they've had to deal with a wave of 'Mailwasher bounced messages' in their postmaster accounts and so I think all the whining is just ludicrous. Bounced messages are only to be expected, and I doubt whether Mailwasher adds anything significant to the millions of bounced messages that occur everyday :) Amen!!! -- Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: HTML mail
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 2:55:07 PM, you wrote: I am very glad you didn't write this one here: http://ccug.apcug.org/newsApr02.htm ;-) :-) ... yeah... Imagine the flames it would set up here...rushing for fireproof clothing. Please continue to ask. I encourage you to write one on The Bat! Coming up soon...December newsletter...or at most Jan. Templates in which you can use anything from simple macros to a highly complicated scripting language. Thus, TB is easy to use for the beginner, who wants to use only simple functions, but it also has a myriad of features that email-geeks like (you find several people on this list that have Emailaholics International mentioned as Organisation in their mail header). Macros are what I plan to learn next. I already do VB so it should not be *too* difficult. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bounce Mail
One feature I would like is to have TB bounce my mail. Mailwasher does it effortlessly...generates a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and mails it back to the recipient...TB should be able to handle it without losing sleep about it. Anyway to do it using Macros or scripts? -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Bounce Mail
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 11:41:28 PM, you wrote: * Mean Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One feature I would like is to have TB bounce my mail. Why? It sometimes helps to have your email removed from spam lists. I agree a lot of addresses from where spam originates are fake but from what sppam I receive, a majority of the addresses are genuine. I don't to mail in unsubscribe-me mails and a bounce is usually good enough to delete you from their database. What is lost anyway. I used to do it using Mailwasher but it is a pain to open one program, review the headers and bounce or delete mails and then open the default email client and receive the rest of it. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Bounce Mail
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 3:27:39 AM, you wrote: And a bounce is also good for having spambots validate e-mail addresses depending on the routing path of the bounce. If The_Bat! was the bouncer it shows the mail bounced from The_Bat!'s receiver address, back through your ISP's SMTP server to the originator's SMTP server and bang, the recipient's address (yours) was valid and validated. This is how you plan to stop spam in your inbox? NOT! You misunderstand. The bounced mail seems to be formatted differently from other replies. It is made to look as if it came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and unless one really analyses the header...well it works. I know it cos I have stopped receiving spam from at least 8 heavy spammers who used to send daily mailers. Point is can this be accomplished? Using scripting or Macros. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Bounce Mail
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 7:55:00 AM, you wrote: Great. So I, as postmaster, would be receiving bounce messages from users who have been spoofing my return address and routing? That'll get them kicked off the system as fast as I can dig up my logs. With the number of bounced messages on the net, do you really think that the postmaster address is going to be monitored and someone is going to make a living of studying bounced messages and finding out if it was a spoofed email addy that caused it. No one has taken Mailwasher to court...I guess when it comes to fighting spam, a little flexibility is expected. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
HTML mail
Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) Best regards, Mean mailto:mean at activewin.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: HTML mail
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 3:54:30 AM, you wrote: Hi TBUDL, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote: MD Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) Ooooh here we go again hold on to your hats ! Hey I review a lot of software and cannot be a Pro at it all. Need to kow things I can put in my review. Did I step in something mucky here? MD. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: HTML mail
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 5:53:41 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:04:47 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 05:34 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: MD Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do MD in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background MD images...background sounds I know might be too much to ask :-) Ooooh here we go again hold on to your hats ! Hey I review a lot of software and cannot be a Pro at it all. Need to kow things I can put in my review. Did I step in something mucky here? You did. ;-) As you have noticed, people on this list (myself included) consider HTML mail an oximoron. Mail is mail, and HTML (hypertext mark-up language) is for hypertext documents, such as web pages. HTML has no place in email. If you want people here go really up the walls, say something positive about IncrediMail eg. Please ask more about the resons why if you want, but I would suggest to do that on TBOT rather than here. Maybe you also want to check out the archives, as this was discussed before in lengthy threads. Are your software reviews on the internet, so we can read a bit? Thanks to all of those who replied. Indeed amny of the reviews are online. I am webmaster and Editor for the Colony Computer User Group. http://ccug.apcug.org the newsletter section has all my reviews. Planning to write one on the Bat! I am a recent user still getting my feet wet...that's why the elementary question. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Marking messages as Read when replied.
the Bat! does have an option to mark messages as replied. Right click the message in the message list window and go toFlagsreplied Surprisingly it does not do it automaticall on clicking reply. Can one setup keyboard shortcuts to do this. In general how does one go about setting keyboard shortcuts in The Bat!? MD. Saturday, November 30, 2002, 4:34:00 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Daniel, MDP @30-Nov-2002, 21:10 +1100 (10:10 UK time) Daniel Hirning [DH] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DH As a result, any message I go to reply to, is marked as unread - DH because I have left it that way to signal a follow-up is DH required. MDP You asked in another branch of this thread for alternate MDP suggestions. Here's what I do: if a message needs a follow up, I hit MDP reply and immediately park it. My outbox contains several parked MDP messages, which are the replies I have yet to write. That way I MDP never overlook anything. MDP I don't know if that way of doing it might help you. MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP TB! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP ' MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- MDP Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) MDP iD8DBQE96JshOeQkq5KdzaARAtLtAJ4z+GFjaB26TgBdLuP/oHpIcLq5tgCguFB/ MDP WtcHcV+FZROEPuk+YuQg9M0= MDP =CCr3 MDP -END PGP SIGNATURE- MDP MDP Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: MDP http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Marking messages as Read when replied.
So that makes it simple right...Assign a Keyboard shortcut to Flagsreplied and Press that shortcut and then Ctrl-R to reply. Message gets replied to and gets marked as replied to at the same time. Saturday, November 30, 2002, 11:47:11 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Mean, TF On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:39:57 +0530 GMT (01/12/02, 01:09 +0700 GMT), TF Mean Drake wrote: In general how does one go about setting keyboard shortcuts in The Bat!? TF View / Edit shortucts. TF Don't ask why it is under the View menu... -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RegKey Location
Why not set The Bat! as default program to open .msg files. Its there in Bat options. MD. - Original Message - From: Eddie Castelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: RegKey Location Dear readers from 'TB!udl List', Does someone know the Regkey Location in W2k where I can set the default eMail Client to TB!? Currently my System now tells that he doesn't have Outlook when I double click on an .msg File. -- best regards Eddie Powered by The Bat! v1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 PGP (public) is available: www.EddieCastelli.com/pgpkey/ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Automatically zipping attachments?
What you could try is Use a program like Winzip. It adds itself to the right click context menus and one of the options when you right click any file is Zip and Email, the file gets zipped and the default email program launches a new message window with the zip attachment. MD. Monday, November 11, 2002, 9:42:09 PM, you wrote: ME On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:08:11 +0100, Eddie Castelli wrote: --- Anders M Eriksson / Montag, 11.11.2002, 11:00:05 Automatically zipping attachments? Is there someway to automatically zip an attachment? Do you mean when you want to make attachments (so they are ZIPed) or when receiving and storing these attachments? ME When I attach a file to my email I want it to be zipped. ME // Anders -- Best regards, Meanmailto:mean;activewin.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Connection Centre
Is there a way to make the connection centre window never appear. In Outlook for example there is a checkbox t not show it during send/receive and OE too sends mail silently. the Bat however during every immediate send pops up the window which is a little disconcerting. Any way to make it not appear. Doesn't seem to be there in most areas I have looked. Mean. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Connection Centre
Three replies in 3 minutes...and to think that was where I hid the MailTickerMust be losing my eyesight. LOL MD. Monday, November 11, 2002, 12:53:30 AM, you wrote: L Good evening Mean, L It was foretold that on 10-11-2002 03:07:37 GMT+0530 (which was L 22:37:37 where I live) Mean Drake would mumble: L snipped a bit MD Is there a way to make the connection centre window never appear. L Preferences general: Display connection centre: hide Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Cutomise replies
The Bat! offers a number of templates for replies, forwards etc. But is there any way to customise the marks used in these. Like in OE one can elect to use any character or none at all while quoting original text. Here it seems we use the initials or name or characters but cannot set it to nothing or some other character. Is it possible to customise that. Mean. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
-> Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? tbudl -- Thread -- -- Date -- <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Code 2 Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Dwight A Corrin Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Reply via email to
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
-> Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? tbudl -- Thread -- -- Date -- <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Code 2 Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Dwight A Corrin Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Reply via email to
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
-> Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? tbudl -- Thread -- -- Date -- <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Code 2 Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Dwight A Corrin Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Reply via email to
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
-> Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? tbudl -- Thread -- -- Date -- <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Code 2 Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Dwight A Corrin Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Reply via email to
Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34?
-> Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? tbudl -- Thread -- -- Date -- <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; google_ad_format = "160x600_as"; google_ad_channel = "8427791634"; google_color_border = "FF"; google_color_bg = "FF"; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Code 2 Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Thomas Fernandez Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Dwight A Corrin Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Maggie Meister Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Re: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? MAU Re[2]: Toolbar icon bug in 4.0.34? Mean Drake Reply via email to
