Thursday, July 24, 2003, Deborah W wrote:
> What I mean is this: let's say you have 20 email accounts set up in TB,
> & you want to check 7 of them, but not the other 13. You have to check
> them one at a time. It would be nice to have a way to select multiple
> accounts to check, in the same way
Friday, July 25, 2003, 12:44:11 PM, you wrote:
DW> Because I would highlight the first account I want to check, then use
DW> ctrl-click to highlight the other accounts I want to check, then press
DW> F2 to check the highlighted accounts :-)
Excellent suggestion. This is something I would like to
Hello Deborah,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:44:11 -0400 GMT (25/07/03, 23:44 +0700 GMT),
Deborah W wrote:
TF>> Oh then, how would TB know which accounts you want to check now, and
TF>> which accounts you want to check next time?
> Because I would highlight the first account I want to check, then use
>
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 11:23:12 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> Oh then, how would TB know which accounts you want to check now, and
TF> which accounts you want to check next time?
Because I would highlight the first account I want to check, then use
ctrl-click to highlight the other account
Hello Deborah,
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:38:49 -0400 GMT (25/07/03, 04:38 +0700 GMT),
Deborah W wrote:
BM>> For the seven account you want to check, select to check at startup
BM>> and every 'x' minutes. Uncheck those fields for the other 13. Those
BM>> 7 will be checked automatically. To check all
Hello Deborah,
> You know what I'd like to see in TB? A way to check *some* email
> accounts without checking all of them, & without checking each
> individually.
I know it is not exactly what you want but take a look at Account /
Properties / Options / Ignore "Check all Accounts" requests.
--
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 5:04:47 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM> For the seven account you want to check, select to check at startup
BM> and every 'x' minutes. Uncheck those fields for the other 13. Those
BM> 7 will be checked automatically. To check all 20, do that
BM> "shift-click."
It's not al
On Thu 24-Jul-03 4:40pm -0400, Deborah W wrote:
> You know what I'd like to see in TB? A way to check *some* email
> accounts without checking all of them, & without checking each
> individually.
> What I mean is this: let's say you have 20 email accounts set up in TB,
> & you want to check 7 of
You know what I'd like to see in TB? A way to check *some* email
accounts without checking all of them, & without checking each
individually.
What I mean is this: let's say you have 20 email accounts set up in TB,
& you want to check 7 of them, but not the other 13. You have to check
them one at a
ON Monday, October 21, 2002, 9:13:26 PM, you wrote:
FPNC> Well, maybe I'm quite strange - sure ;) - but I'm used to this way of
FPNC> thinking/archiving emails (more than 35,000 and counting up) and I'm
FPNC> subscribed to more than 100 mail lists, so I have 100 filters to be
FPNC> set up for sur
Hello!
> FPNC> It would be great to be able to have a text file with this format:
> FPNC> T [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\Fernando\News\NYTimes
> Here is a different solution to you problem. Why not have an address book
> entry with the destination folder to place incoming mails for this
> address or addr
ON Sunday, October 20, 2002, 11:57:02 PM, you wrote:
FPNC> It would be great to be able to have a text file with this format:
FPNC> F [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\Fernando\People\Mario
FPNC> F [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\Fernando\People\Elias
FPNC> T [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\Fernando\Security\MSoft
FPNC> T [EMAIL PROT
Friday, May 19, 2000, 7:09:39 PM, Nick wrote:
> At the time, I didn't really see any difference between using UE with
> PMMail, and using Word as an Editor with Outlook 2K. Both scenarios were
> just too much overhead for my System, and of course overkill for my needs,
> aside from the fact I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 19, 2000, 4:07:14 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> How could it /not/ be intuitive? You enter the address in the to: field,
> enter, cc/bcc as needed, enter, subject, enter, it automatically goes into the
> external editor.
Sorry Steve, perh
Friday, May 19, 2000, 4:00:10 PM, Nick wrote:
> of an external editor (I chose UltraEdit I think) was not even remotely
> intuitive.
How could it /not/ be intuitive? You enter the address in the to: field,
enter, cc/bcc as needed, enter, subject, enter, it automatically goes into the
externa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 17, 2000, 11:05:42 AM, Daniel Szmulewicz wrote:
> I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in
> editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor.
> Pmmail allows that, and this feature is
Greetings Daniel!
On Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 20:05:42 GMT +0200 (which was 11:05 AM where you
think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
DS> I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in
DS> editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor.
DS> Pmmai
hallo Tom!
on Wednesday, May 17, 2000, 8:23:45 PM, you wrote:
DS>> I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in
DS>> editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor.
TP> Yes this has been suggested before and apparently is being considered
TP> for v2
DS> I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in
DS> editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor.
Yes this has been suggested before and apparently is being considered
for v2.
-tom!
--
Hopin' this said *something* useful, [EMAIL PROTECTED] out.
I do not wish to start a new flame war around the much debated built-in
editor, but may I suggest to allow the use of an external editor.
Pmmail allows that, and this feature is well implemented.
Since user-configurability is the philosophy of the Bat!,
the possibility of using an editor of the
Morning SyP,
> I would like to be able to simply tell TB! to apply a filter to any
> mail coming from a single entry in Address Book. (in which there are
> all email addresses listed for a person) And then, to apply to all
> entry from a Group.
I agree. Sorting on address book entrys, groups or
Hello The Bat! users,
I have many friends, who have multiple email addresses. I even have
more then ten. Currently, if I want to be sure that Sorting Office
correctly filters, I must write like this:
Location: Sender Presence: Yes Strings: baz1@foo1|baz2@fool|baz3@foo3 etc.
I would like to be ab
22 matches
Mail list logo
