Re[3]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread Terry
On Monday, September 29, 2003 at 11:03 PM, David wrote: I would be happy to supply a lot of spam messages to folks who need some samples for training purposes! ;-) Thanks for the offer, but I get enough myself. :) With all the talk about spam on the list lately, I thought I'd share some

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Terry, Of course, I could be wrong about this as it is my interpretation of Graham's writings. If I am, I hope someone will let me know. I think your interpretation is correct. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp OFF:

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread Terry
Hi Miguel, I think your interpretation is correct. Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not often correct. vbg -- Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Terry, Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not often correct. vbg Hey! I can say you are correct as many times as you wish. And for free, I won't even ask for a beer ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp

Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Miguel, Paul John and Mark: Thank you, all, for your help with the filtering roundup I had proposed. I want to implement Bayesian filtering and am looking for best practices and products. of course that's always going to be somewhat subjective. So these are the solutions mentioned which

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Mogens Holst
Hello David, Monday, September 29, 2003, 17:11, you wrote: DRA Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else? This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter! -- Regards, Mogens Using The Bat!

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Mogens: Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:15:53 AM, you wrote: MH This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun MH to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter! Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too, and I don't know how

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello David, On 29 Sep 2003 at 15:25:29 -0400 GMT [21:25 CEST] you wrote: DRA Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too, DRA and I don't know how I forgot to put it on my list. You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since 2.0. So unless you intent to

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Monday, September 29, 2003, 4:46:01 AM, David wrote: So these are the solutions mentioned which are working well for some of you: Popfile, SpamPal, K9 and the Bat's Known filter approach. Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else? David, I missed

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Andre: Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:11:24 PM, you wrote: AW You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since AW 2.0. So none of these are usable until I upgrade: BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. Correct? Thank you. -- Best wishes,

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Keith: Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote: (snip) KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip) KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip) KRa pain to set up--for me, at least--but I finally got it KR KRworking today and it has great

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Deborah W
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:46:17 PM, David R. Austen wrote: DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade: DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. DRA Correct? Thank you. I can't speak for the others, but Popfile works fine here with 1.62, with earlier

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread ETM
I also was using K9 with the lower version of TB! Elaine Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello David, On 29 Sep 2003 at 17:46:17 -0400 GMT [23:46 CEST] you wrote: DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade: DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. DRA Correct? Thank you. No, incorrect. Of these only BayesIt is a Plugin. Popfile, Spampal and K9

Re[3]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello David, Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:03:19 PM, you wrote: DRA Hello, Keith: DRA Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote: DRA (snip) KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip) KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip) KRa pain to set